1
|
Bernhardt F, Bückmann A, Krüger J, Bauer B, Hofmeister U, Juhra C, Eveslage M, Fischhuber K, Storck M, Brix TJ, Lenz P. Telemedicine Plus Standard Care Versus Standard Care Only in Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care: A Randomized Controlled Noninferiority Trial. Telemed J E Health 2024; 30:1459-1469. [PMID: 38294865 DOI: 10.1089/tmj.2023.0621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Patients suffering from incurable diseases are more likely to die in the hospital than at home. Specialized outpatient palliative care (PC) may be able to counteract this tendency. Similarly, potential benefits of telemedicine in health care were scientifically reported. The aim of this research was to compare patients receiving specialized outpatient PC plus telemedicine with those receiving standard specialized outpatient PC only. In this study, telemedicine is assumed to decrease the number of home visits and therefore should not be considered a mere add-on. Methods: This is a randomized controlled noninferiority trial. Recruitment lasted between January 2020 and October 2021. Quality of care was evaluated using the Integrated Palliative Care Outcome Scale (IPOS) at day 0, 7, and 14 after randomization. Change from day 0 to 7 was defined as the primary outcome (noninferiority margin = 4 points). This study was conducted in an urban setting in collaboration with a university hospital and a local specialized outpatient PC service. Results: A total of 196 patients were screened with 34 patients included (18 telemedicine/16 standard care). The mean change in the total score of the IPOS from day 0 to 7 amounted to -1.8 ± 3.9 (telemedicine) versus 1.2 ± 5.7 (standard care). The telemedicine group was statistically not relevantly inferior to the standard care group (t-test for noninferiority, p = 0.005). Conclusions: Although, due to COVID-19, the sample size remained rather small, our findings indicate that telemedical approaches offer a promising and equally effective option to provide specialized outpatient PC. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06054048.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Bernhardt
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- West German Cancer Center Consortium, Network Partner Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Andreas Bückmann
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- West German Cancer Center Consortium, Network Partner Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Janina Krüger
- Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care Service Muenster, Palliativnetz Muenster gGmbH, Muenster, Germany
| | - Birgit Bauer
- Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care Service Muenster, Palliativnetz Muenster gGmbH, Muenster, Germany
| | - Ulrike Hofmeister
- Specialized Outpatient Palliative Care Service Muenster, Palliativnetz Muenster gGmbH, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Juhra
- Office for eHealth, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Maria Eveslage
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Karen Fischhuber
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Storck
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Tobias J Brix
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- West German Cancer Center Consortium, Network Partner Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hayes Bauer E, Schultz ANØ, Brandt F, Smith AC, Bollig G, Dieperink KB. Patient and families' perspectives on telepalliative care: A systematic integrative review. Palliat Med 2024; 38:42-56. [PMID: 38112009 PMCID: PMC10865769 DOI: 10.1177/02692163231217146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Telepalliative care is increasingly used in palliative care, but has yet to be examined from a patient and family perspective. A synthesis of evidence may provide knowledge on how to plan and provide telepalliative care that caters specifically to patients and families' needs. OBJECTIVE To synthesise evidence on patients and families' perspectives on telepalliative care. DESIGN A systematic integrative review (PROSPERO #CRD42022301206) reported in accordance with PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Inclusion criteria; primary peer-reviewed studies published 2011-2022, patient and family perspective, >18 years, telepalliative care and English/Danish language. Quality was appraised using the mixed-methods appraisal tool, version 2020. Guided by Toronto and Remington, data were extracted, thematically analysed and synthesised. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO and CINAHL were searched in March 2022 and updated in February 2023. RESULTS Forty-four studies were included. Analysis revealed five themes; the effect of the Covid-19 pandemic on telepalliative care, adding value for patients and families, synchronous and asynchronous telepalliative care, the integration of telepalliative care with other services and the tailoring and timing of telepalliative care. CONCLUSION Enhanced access to care and convenience, as attributes of telepalliative care, are highly valued. Patients and families have varying needs during the illness trajectory that may be addressed by early integration of telepalliative care based on models of care that are flexible and combine synchronous and asynchronous solutions. Further research should examine telepalliative care in a post-pandemic context, use of models of care and identify meaningful outcome measures from patient and family perspectives for evaluation of telepalliative care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eithne Hayes Bauer
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Unit, Hospital Soenderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, Family Focused Healthcare Research Centre (FaCe), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Anders Nikolai Ørsted Schultz
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Unit, Hospital Soenderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Frans Brandt
- Institute of Regional Health Research, Hospital Soenderjylland, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Internal Medicine, Medical Research Unit, Hospital Soenderjylland, University Hospital of Southern Jutland, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Innovative Medical Technology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Faculty of Medicine, Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Australia
| | - Georg Bollig
- HELIOS Klinikum Schleswig, Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy, Schleswig, Schleswig-Holstein, Germany
- Department of Palliative Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Karin Brochstedt Dieperink
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Department of Clinical Research, Family Focused Healthcare Research Centre (FaCe), University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bückmann A, Bernhardt F, Eveslage M, Storck M, Thölking G, Buss H, Domagk D, Juhra C, Lenz P. Telemedical Consultations in Palliative Care: Benefits through Knowledge Exchange and Intercollegiate Collaboration-Findings from the German oVID Project. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15092512. [PMID: 37173978 PMCID: PMC10177576 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15092512] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2023] [Revised: 04/19/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: As the number of people receiving specialized palliative care (PC) continues to rise, there is a need to ensure the transfer of this expertise from university-based PC departments to primary care hospitals without such in-house access. The present study examines the potential of telemedicine to bridge these gaps. (2) Methods: This is a prospective multi-center feasibility trial. All physicians were appropriately pre-equipped and instructed to conduct telemedical consultations (TCs), which took place within fixed meetings or on-call appointments either related or unrelated to individual patients (allowing TCs also for educational and knowledge exchange purposes). (3) Results: An inquiry for participation was submitted to 11 hospitals, with 5 external hospitals actively cooperating. In the first study section, a total of 57 patient cases were included within 95 patient-related TCs during 80 meetings. Other university disciplines were involved in 21 meetings (26.2%). Therapy adjustments resulted following 25 of 71 affected TCs (35.2%). In 20 cases (21.1%), an on-site consultation at the university hospital was avoided, and in 12 cases (12.6%), a transfer was avoided. Overall, TCs were considered helpful in resolving issues for 97.9% of the cases (n = 93). Yet, technical problems arose in about one-third of all meetings for at least one physician (36.2%; n = 29). Besides, in the second study section, we also conducted 43 meetings between physicians for education and knowledge exchange only. (4) Conclusions: Telemedicine has the potential to transfer university expertise to external hospitals through simple means. It improves collaboration among physicians, may prevent unnecessary transfers or outpatient presentations, and is thus likely to lower costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Bückmann
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- West German Cancer Center Consortium (WTZ), Network Partner Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Florian Bernhardt
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- West German Cancer Center Consortium (WTZ), Network Partner Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Maria Eveslage
- Institute of Biostatistics and Clinical Research, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Storck
- Institute of Medical Informatics, University of Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Gerold Thölking
- Department of Internal Medicine and Nephrology, University Hospital Muenster Marienhospital Steinfurt, 48565 Steinfurt, Germany
| | - Helga Buss
- Department of Geriatrics, EVK Muenster Alexianer Johannisstift GmbH, 48147 Muenster, Germany
| | - Dirk Domagk
- Department of Medicine I: Internal Medicine and Gastroenterology, Josephs-Hospital Warendorf, Academic Teaching Hospital of the University of Muenster, 48231 Warendorf, Germany
| | - Christian Juhra
- Office for eHealth, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| | - Philipp Lenz
- Department of Palliative Care, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
- West German Cancer Center Consortium (WTZ), Network Partner Muenster, University Hospital Muenster, 48149 Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Bauer EH, Schultz ANØ, Brandt F, Smith AC, Bollig G, Dieperink KB. Protocol for an integrative review: patient and families' perspectives on telehealth in palliative care. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e062723. [PMID: 36688736 PMCID: PMC9454006 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062723] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Accepted: 08/09/2022] [Indexed: 01/26/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Increases in the use of telehealth in palliative care (telepalliative care) prior to, and during, the COVID-19 pandemic have resulted in a proliferation of studies on the topic. While knowledge is building on how providers and recipients adapt to telepalliative care, no reviews have, as of yet, examined telepalliative care from a patient and family perspective. Therefore, the aim of this integrative review is to explore patients and families' perspectives on telepalliative. METHODS AND ANALYSIS An integrative review will be performed inspired by the methodology of Remmington and Toronto from March 2022 to December 2022. Medline, Embase, PsycINFO and CINAHL will be searched for primary peer-reviewed studies that describe telepalliative care from patient and families' perspectives. Limiters will be used for age; 18 years+, time; 10 years, and language; English and Danish. Hand searches of authors of included articles and reference lists of included articles will be performed. Two reviewers will independently screen and appraise selected articles using the Mixed Method Appraisal Tool. Conflicts will be resolved through discussions with a third reviewer. Data will be extracted independently by two reviewers into a data matrix with predefined headings and analysed using thematic analysis. Findings will be reported thematically, summarised into a thematic synthesis and discussed in relation to relevant literature. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethical approval is not required for this review. Results will be published in an international peer-reviewed journal and presented at a relevant international conference. Reporting of this protocol was guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses Protocol checklist and prospectively reported to PROSPERO (CRD42022301206).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eithne Hayes Bauer
- Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland Sonderborg Branch, Aabenraa, Denmark
- Institute of Regional Health Research - University Hospital of Southern Denmark, University of Southern Denmark, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | | | - Frans Brandt
- Research Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, Hospital of Southern Jutland Sonderborg Branch, Aabenraa, Denmark
| | - Anthony C Smith
- Centre for Online Health, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Georg Bollig
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, Palliative Medicine and Pain Therapy, Helios Klinikum, Schleswig, Germany
| | - Karin Brochstedt Dieperink
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|