The Digital Divide: A Retrospective Survey of Digital Rectal Examinations during the Workup of Rectal Cancers

The Importance of Digital Rectal Examination in Identifying Early-Onset Rectal Malignancies

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most diagnosed cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States. Rectal cancers, specifically, are the second most common cancer of the large intestine. Although once perceived as a disease of the elderly, the incidence of early-onset CRC (EO-CRC), classified as occurring in individuals less than 50 years old, has been paradoxically increasing. Although the incidence of rectal cancers has increased, the digital rectal exam (DRE) continues to be an underutilized physical exam maneuver when a patient presents with red-flag symptoms. Here, we present a case of a 38-year-old male from West Virginia who was referred to general surgery for complaints of rectal bleeding attributed to internal hemorrhoids. After undergoing a colonoscopy, the patient was found to have a rectal mass consistent with adenocarcinoma. We describe the importance of identifying red-flag signs to keep colorectal malignancy in the differential diagnosis in a young patient and highlight the importance of performing rectal exams to identify rectal cancers early to expedite treatment.

Awareness and Acceptance of Digital Rectal Examination for the Clinical Evaluation of Anorectal Conditions Among the Saudi Population: A Cross-Sectional Study

INTRODUCTION

Digital rectal examination (DRE) is an important diagnostic tool used by physicians to resolve several confusing clinical situations. The history and physical examination cannot be complete without performing a DRE. Any patient that presents with abdominal complaints (e.g., diarrhea, constipation, nausea, vomiting, abdominal or rectal pain, bleeding) needs a DRE which is important for detecting warning signs of serious conditions that require further investigation and evaluation such as malignancies. Therefore, our aim was to assess and measure the awareness of the Saudi population regarding the importance and acceptance to perform DRE.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study was conducted in Riyadh, the capital city of Saudi Arabia, using an online survey between September 2022 and March 2023; the targeted participants were adults between the ages of 18 to 75.

RESULTS

The study indicated that the general community awareness of DRE is low, with only 59.1% of participants having heard of DRE and 14.6% having undergone the procedure previously. The majority of individuals (60.9%) were willing to undergo DRE if a healthcare provider suggested it. Participants' knowledge of DRE's ability to detect various anorectal diseases varied. While the majority of individuals believed DRE could detect hemorrhoids, just 40.4% believed DRE could help detect colorectal cancer. Chronic constipation or diarrhea, feces-induced stretching, and prolonged sitting were the most oft-cited causes of hemorrhoids. Anemia was the most often reported consequence of hemorrhoids, followed by hypertension and diabetes.

CONCLUSION

The significance of DRE as a screening tool for the early detection and prevention of anorectal problems, as well as the need for adequate care and treatment of hemorrhoids to prevent complications, are highlighted by these findings. Healthcare practitioners should actively recommend and provide information about DRE and other screening technologies, as well as address their patients' concerns and misconceptions.

Anal Squamous Intraepithelial Lesions and Anal Cancer Management in Low Resource Settings

A low resource setting (LRS) is defined as a health care system which does not meet the criteria defined by the World Health Organization (WHO) or other national/international organizations in the following areas: infrastructure, materials, and human resources. 1 Patients encounter barriers which limit their access to care and services that are considered standard of care. While LRS is most commonly associated with developing countries, it is easy to overlook communities in developed countries which lack the financial resources to afford basic health care. This article describes the societal implications and barriers to care for both squamous intraepithelial lesions (SILs) and anal cancer in LRS, the existing screening/surveillance approaches, available treatment approaches to anal cancer, and it also discusses potential evidence-based approaches to bridge the gap for these disparities in anal cancer care.