First Molecular Identification of Three Clinical Isolates of Fungi Causing Mucormycosis in Honduras

Strengthening Fungal Infection Diagnosis and Treatment: An In-depth Analysis of Capabilities in Honduras

Background

Invasive fungal infections (IFIs) are a major public health concern in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) due to limited diagnostic and treatment resources, leading to high morbidity and mortality. Despite their significant global burden, IFIs are underrecognized and underdiagnosed in LMICs. This study evaluates the diagnostic and therapeutic capacities for managing IFI in Honduras, a country with unique health care challenges.

Methods

From March to December 2023, a comprehensive survey was conducted across multiple health care centers in Honduras. The survey, reviewed for content and clarity by local medical institutions, targeted medical microbiologists and clinicians to assess various aspects of fungal disease diagnosis and treatment. Data included the availability and use of diagnostic tools and antifungal therapies, identifying gaps and limitations in current practices.

Results

The survey revealed that Candida spp (97.4%) and Aspergillus spp (35.9%) were the most concerning pathogens. Although microscopy and culture methods were available in most institutions, their application in suspected IFI cases was inconsistent, and antifungal susceptibility testing was rarely performed. Advanced diagnostic techniques, such as antigen detection, were available in only a few institutions, while antibody detection and polymerase chain reaction testing were entirely absent. All hospitals had access to at least 1 triazole antifungal, typically fluconazole, but there was a notable scarcity of more potent antifungals, including amphotericin B formulations and echinocandins. The limited use of available diagnostic tools and the restricted availability of essential antifungals were identified as major barriers to effective IFI management.

Conclusions

This study highlights significant gaps in the diagnostic and therapeutic capabilities for managing IFI in Honduras. The underutilization of basic diagnostic tools, the inaccessibility of advanced testing methods, and the limited availability of essential antifungal medications underscore the urgent need for capacity-building initiatives, infrastructure improvements, and policy reforms. Addressing these deficiencies is critical for enhancing the management of IFI in Honduras, with broader implications for similar LMIC settings. These findings can inform targeted interventions and resource allocation to improve outcomes for patients with IFI.

Mucormycosis caused by Apophysomyces species: An experience from a tertiary care hospital in Western India and systematic review of global cases

Apophysomyces species are an emerging cause of mucormycosis in several regions of the world, primarily affecting immunocompetent individuals. The present study addresses the global epidemiology, clinical presentation, management and outcome of mucormycosis caused by Apophysomyces spp. The study included patients diagnosed with Apophysomyces infection at our hospital between March 2019 and August 2020. In addition, cases published in PubMed and Google Scholar from inception to July 2022 were systematically searched and analysed. Only proven and probable cases that meet the eligibility criteria were included. The Indian cases were compared with those from other countries, and the results were analysed by descriptive statistics. In total, six cases of mucormycosis due to Apophysomyces spp. were diagnosed at our hospital, with additional 250 cases identified through literature search. The main underlying diseases were diabetes mellitus (24%), malignancy (3.2%) and chronic kidney disease (2.8%). The major predisposing factor was trauma (55.6%). Necrotizing fasciitis was the most common (63.2%) clinical presentation. Healthcare-associated mucormycosis accounted for 10.4% of the cases. Globally, A. elegans was the most common species (48.8%), whereas A. variabilis was predominant (86.2%) in India. Surgery was performed in 83.5% of patients. Among those treated with antifungal agents, 98% received amphotericin B and 8.1% received posaconazole. Inappropriate antifungal usage was observed in 12.7%. The overall mortality was 42.3%. A combined medical and surgical management was associated with higher survival. Our study highlights the knowledge gap among physicians regarding this infection. A timely diagnosis and aggressive management can improve the outcomes in such cases.