1
|
Musco S, Padilla-Fernández B, Del Popolo G, Bonifazi M, Blok BFM, Groen J, 't Hoen L, Pannek J, Bonzon J, Kessler TM, Schneider MP, Gross T, Karsenty G, Phé V, Hamid R, Ecclestone H, Castro-Diaz D. Value of urodynamic findings in predicting upper urinary tract damage in neuro-urological patients: A systematic review. Neurourol Urodyn 2018; 37:1522-1540. [PMID: 29392753 DOI: 10.1002/nau.23501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2017] [Accepted: 12/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
AIM The main goals of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD) management are preventing upper urinary tract damage (UUTD), improving continence, and quality of life. Here, we aimed to systematically assess all available evidence on urodynamics predicting UUTD in patients with NLUTD. METHODS A systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) Statement was performed in March 2017. Only neuro-urological patients assessed by urodynamics were included. Any outcome of upper urinary tract function were evaluated. RESULTS Forty-nine studies (1 randomized controlled trial, 9 prospective, and 39 retrospective case series) reported urodynamic data on 4930 neuro-urological patients. Of those, 2828 (98%) were spina bifida (SB) children. The total number of adults was 2044, mainly having spinal cord injury (SCI) (60%). A low bladder compliance was found in 568 (46.3%) and 341 (29.3%) of the paediatric and adult population, respectively. Hydronephrosis (HDN) was detected in 557 children (27.8%) in 19/28 studies and 178 adults (14.6%), mainly SCI, in 14/21 studies. Nine out of 30 multiple sclerosis (MS) patients affected by HDN (16.8%) showed low compliance in 4/14 studies. CONCLUSIONS Patients with SB and SCI have a higher risk of developing UUTD (mainly reported as HDN) compared to those with MS. Reduced compliance and high DLPP were major risk factors for UUTD. Although our findings clarify the mandatory role of urodynamics in the management of NLUTD, standardization and better implementation of assessments in daily practice may further improve outcomes of neuro-urological patients based on objective measurements, that is, urodynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefania Musco
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Barbara Padilla-Fernández
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| | - Giulio Del Popolo
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Matteo Bonifazi
- Department of Neuro-Urology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Bertil F M Blok
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan Groen
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisette 't Hoen
- Department of Urology, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jürgen Pannek
- Neuro-Urology, Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Jerome Bonzon
- Neuro-Urology, Swiss Paraplegic Center, Nottwil, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Kessler
- Neuro-Urology, Spinal Cord Injury Center & Research, University of Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Marc P Schneider
- Neuro-Urology, Spinal Cord Injury Center & Research, University of Zürich, Balgrist University Hospital, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - Tobias Gross
- Department of Urology, University of Bern, Inselspital, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Gilles Karsenty
- Department of Urology, Aix Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Véronique Phé
- Department of Urology, Pitié-Salpêtrière Academic Hospital, Paris 6 University, Paris Cedex 13, France
| | - Rizwan Hamid
- Department of Neuro-Urology, London Spinal Injuries Centre, Stanmore, UK
| | - Hazel Ecclestone
- Department of Neuro-Urology, London Spinal Injuries Centre, Stanmore, UK
| | - David Castro-Diaz
- Department of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Canarias, Universidad de La Laguna, Santa Cruz de Tenerife, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND CONTEXT Patients with spina bifida (SB) are at risk for pathological fractures and low bone mineral density (BMD). PURPOSE AND METHODS This article reviews the literature and provides a comprehensive overview of how the characteristics of SB and its associated comorbidities intersect with bone fragility to identify possible pathophysiological mechanisms of fractures and low BMD. RESULTS Bone fragility occurs early in the life of patients with SB as a result of a disturbance that determines changes in bone shape, quantity, and quality, as poor mineralization reduces bone stiffness. Bone fragility in SB occurs due to local and systemic factors and may be considered a state of impaired bone quality of multifactorial aetiology, with complex interacting influences of neurological, metabolic, and endocrinological origins and the presence of smaller bones. Bone fragility should be evaluated globally according to skeletal age and Tanner staging. The phases of the evolution of Charcot joints seem to intercept the evolution of epiphyseal fractures. Charcot arthropathy in SB may be initiated by the occurrence of repetitive trauma and fractures in epiphyseal and subepiphyseal regions, where there is a deficit of bone mineralization and greater bone mass deficits. CONCLUSION Bone fragility in MMC potentially has a multifactorial neuro-endocrinological-metabolic-renal dimension, with smaller bones, lower bone mass, and mineralization deficits affecting bone strength.
Collapse
|