Immobilization of Lead Migrating from Contaminated Soil in Rhizosphere Soil of Barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) and Hairy Vetch (Vicia villosa) Using Hydroxyapatite

Promising strategies of circular bioeconomy using heavy metal phytoremediated plants - A critical review

Phytoremediation is an excellent method for removing harmful heavy metals from the environment since it is eco-friendly, uses little energy, and is inexpensive. However, as phytoremediated plants can turn into secondary sources for heavy metals, complete heavy metal removal from phytoremediated plants is necessary. Elimination of toxic heavy metals from phytoremediated plants should be considered with foremost care. This review highlights about important sources of heavy metal contamination, health effects caused by heavy metal contamination and technological breakthroughs of phytoremediation. This review critically emphasis about promising strategies to be engaged for absolute reutilization of heavy metals and spectacular approaches of production of commercially imperative products from phytoremediated plants through circular bioeconomy with key barriers. Thus, phytoremediation combined with circular bioeconomy can create a new platform for the eco-friendly life.

A review on disposal and utilization of phytoremediation plants containing heavy metals

The reasonable disposal of plant biomass containing heavy metals (HMs) is a difficult problem for the phytoremediation technology. This review summarizes current literature that introduces various disposal and utilization methods (heat treatment, extraction treatment, microbial treatment, compression landfill, and synthesis of nanomaterials) for phytoremediation plants with HMs. The operation process and technical parameters of each disposal method are different. HMs can migrate and transform in different disposal processes. Some disposal and utilization methods can get some by-products. The main purpose of this paper is to provide reference for technical parameters and characteristics of various disposal and utilization methods, so as to choose and use the appropriate method for the treatment of plant biomass containing HMs after phytoremediation.

Insights into decontamination of soils by phytoremediation: A detailed account on heavy metal toxicity and mitigation strategies

In the current era of rapid industrialization, the foremost challenge is the management of industrial wastes. Activities such as mining and industrialization spill over a large quantity of toxic waste that pollutes soil, water, and air. This poses a major environmental and health challenge. The toxic heavy metals present in the soil and water are entering the food chain, which in turn causes severe health hazards. Environmental clean-up and reclamation of heavy metal contaminated soil and water are very important, and it necessitates efforts of environmentalists, industrialists, scientists, and policymakers. Phytoremediation is a plant-based approach to remediate heavy metal/organic pollutant contaminated soil and water in an eco-friendly, cost-effective, and permanent way. This review covers the effect of heavy metal toxicity on plant growth and physiological process, the concept of heavy metal accumulation, detoxification, and the mechanisms of tolerance in plants. Based on plants' ability to uptake heavy metals and metabolize them within tissues, phytoremediation techniques have been classified into six types: phytoextraction, phytoimmobilization, phytovolatilization, phytodegradation, rhizofiltration, and rhizodegradation. The development of research in this area led to the identification of metal hyper-accumulators, which could be utilized for reclamation of contaminated soil through phytomining. Concurrently, breeding and biotechnological approaches can enhance the remediation efficiency. Phytoremediation technology, combined with other reclamation technologies/practices, can provide clean soil and water to the ecosystem.

In situ phytoremediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil and groundwater: a green inventive approach

The heavy metal contamination of soil and groundwater is a serious threat to environment worldwide. The survival of human being primarily relies upon soil and groundwater sources. Therefore, the remediation of heavy metal-contaminated soil and groundwater is a matter of utmost concern. Heavy metals are non-degradable and persist in the environment and subsequently contaminate the food chain. Heavy metal pollution puts a serious impact on human health and it adversely affects our physical body. Although, numerous in situ conventional technologies have been utilized for the treatment purpose, but most of the techniques have some limitations such as high cost, deterioration of soil properties, disturbances to soil native flora and fauna and intensive labour. Despite that, in situ phytoremediation is a cost-effective, eco-friendly, solar-driven and novel approach with significant public acceptance. The past research reflects rare discussion addressing both (heavy metal in situ phytoremediation of soil and groundwater) in one platform. The present review article covers both the concepts of in situ phytoremediation of soil and groundwater with major emphasis on health risks of heavy metals, enhanced integrated approaches of in situ phytoremediation, mechanisms of in situ phytoremediation along with effective hyperaccumulator plants for heavy metals remediation, challenges and future prospects.

Phosphorus recovery from soil through phosphorus extraction and retention on material: A comparison between batch extraction-retention and column percolation

Phosphorus (P) recovery from wastewater and soil is important for preventing the depletion of P resources; however, a method for recovering P from soil has not yet been developed. We designed and tested systems to recover P from excavated and in situ soil. P extraction from soil using citric acid, EDTA, and water is combined with P retention by calcium (Ca)- and magnesium (Mg)-containing material in both the batch extraction-retention and column percolation approach. In the batch extraction-retention test, Ca hydroxide retained more P than the other materials at 0.38-0.76 mg g^-1, and the P was retained as Ca phosphate-like minerals. The amount of P retained by materials using chelating solutions was higher than with water, regardless of the material. The amount of P in the Ca-containing materials after the column percolation test was higher than in the Mg-containing materials, with the exception of Ca carbonate. In the column percolation test, the percentage of P recovery from the available P in the soil was 4.9% and 3.5% using Ca hydroxide and Ca oxide with water, respectively, and the application of chelating solutions did not improve P recovery. In the batch extraction-retention test, the percentage of P recovery using Ca hydroxide and Ca oxide with water was the same as that obtained by the column percolation test; however, the use of chelating solutions could improve the P retention to more than 11% and 7%, respectively. These results demonstrate that more than 10% and 5% of the available P in the soil could be recovered using Ca hydroxide in the batch extraction-retention test with citric acid and EDTA solutions and the column percolation test with water, respectively. The P-retained material may be used as a source for the production of chemical fertilizer.

Feature of lead complexed with dissolved organic matter on lead immobilization by hydroxyapatite in aqueous solutions and soils

Lead (Pb) complexed with dissolved organic matter (DOM-Pb) is a dominant Pb species in soils, but it is not clear that DOM-Pb is stably immobilized by hydroxyapatite. This study investigates how DOM-Pb is immobilized by hydroxyapatite in both aqueous solutions and soils. A sorption test showed that 69.5% of DOM-Pb is removed in an aqueous solution, but less DOM-Pb is retained by hydroxyapatite compared with Pb ions. On the basis of the ratio of Pb and dissolved organic carbon before and after the sorption test, 7% of Pb was retained as DOM-Pb by hydroxyapatite, but 93% of Pb was dissociated from DOM-Pb, and was sorbed as Pb ions. The concentrations of water-soluble Pb re-released were higher in the DOM-Pb solution than those in the Pb ion solution in sandy loam soil with hydroxyapatite. A column-leaching test that flowed the DOM-Pb solution showed that Pb concentrations in leached water from sandy loam soil gradually increased after the middle stage of the test despite the presence of hydroxyapatite. The amount of water-soluble Pb re-released from soils with and without the hydroxyapatite that flowed the DOM-Pb solution was the same as or greater than that without the hydroxyapatite that flowed the Pb ion solution. This study concludes that in soils with low Pb sorption ability, some of the Pb retained as DOM-Pb is water soluble and possibly re-released despite the presence of hydroxyapatite, although most Pb in DOM-Pb is stably sorbed as Pb ions.