Effect of Time and Mixing in Thermal Pretreatment on Faecal Indicator Bacteria Inactivation

Viability and removal assessment of Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. by real-time PCR with propidium monoazide in the hygienization of sewage sludge using three anaerobic processes

Sewage sludge should be stabilized for its beneficial use and pathogens, among other factors, should comply with environmental regulations. Three sludge stabilization process were compared to assess their suitability for producing Class A biosolids: MAD-AT (mesophilic (37 °C) anaerobic digestion (MAD) followed by an alkaline treatment (AT)); TAD (thermophilic (55 °C) anaerobic digester); and TP-TAD (mild thermal (80 °C, 1 h) pretreatment (TP) followed by a TAD). E. coli and Salmonella spp. were determined, differentiating three possible states: total cells (qPCR), viable cells using the propidium monoazide method (PMA-qPCR), and culturable cells (MPN). Culture techniques followed by the confirmative biochemical tests identified the presence of Salmonella spp. in PS and MAD samples, while the molecular methods (qPCR and PMA-qPCR) showed negative results in all samples. The TP + TAD arrangement reduced the concentration of total and viable E. coli cells in a greater extent than the TAD process. However, an increase of culturable E. coli was observed in the corresponding TAD step, indicating that the mild thermal pretreatment induced the viable but non-culturable state in E. coli. In addition, the PMA technique did not discriminate viable from non-viable bacteria in complex matrices. The three processes produced Class A biosolids (fecal coliforms < 1000 MPN/gTS and Salmonella spp, < 3 MPN/gTS) maintaining compliance after a 72 h storage period. It appears that the TP step favors the viable but not culturable state in E. coli cells, a finding that should be considered when adopting mild thermal treatment in sludge stabilization process arrangements.

Fate of Clostridia and other spore-forming Firmicute bacteria during feedstock anaerobic digestion and aerobic composting

Pathogenic spore-forming Firmicutes are commonly present in animal and human wastes that are used as fertilizers in crop production. Pre-treatments of organic waste prior to land application offer the potential to abate enteric microorganisms, and therefore reduce the risk of contamination of crops or adjacent water resources with pathogens carried in these materials. The inactivation and reduction of gram-positive spore formers such as Clostridium spp., Clostridioides spp. and Bacillus spp. from animal and human waste can be challenging given the recalcitrance of the spores these bacteria produce. Given the significance of these organisms to human and animal health, information concerning spore-forming bacteria inactivation during anaerobic digestion (AD) and aerobic composting (AC) is required as the basis for recommending safe organic waste management practices. In this review, an assessment of the inactivation of spore-forming Firmicutes during AD and AC was conducted to provide guidance for practical management of organic matrices of animal or human origin. Temperature and pH may be the main factors contributing to the inactivation of spore-forming Firmicutes during batch lab-scale AD (log reduction <0.5-5 log). In continuous digesters, wet AD systems do not effectively inactivate spore-forming Firmicutes even under thermopholic conditions (log reduction -1.09 - 0.98), but dry AD systems could be a feasible management practice to inactivate spore-forming Firmicutes from organic materials with high solid content (log reduction 1.77-3.1). In contrast, composting is an effective treatment to abate spore-forming Firmicutes (log reduction 1.7-6.5) when thermophilic conditions last at least six consecutive days. Temperature, moisture content and composting scale are the key operating conditions influencing the inactivation of spore-forming Firmicutes during composting. Where possible, undertaking AD with subsequent composting to ensure the biosafety of digestate before its downstream processing and recycling is recommended to abate recalcitrant bacteria in digestate.

Evaluation of pathogen concentration in anaerobic digestate using a predictive modelling approach (ADRISK)

Farmyard manure and slurry (FYM&S) is a valuable feedstock for anaerobic digestion (AD) plants. However, FYM&S may contain high concentrations of pathogens, and complete inactivation through the AD process is unlikely. Thus, following land application of digestate, pathogens may contaminate a range of environmental media posing a potential threat to public health. The present study aimed to combine primary laboratory data with literature-based secondary data to develop an Excel-based exposure assessment model (ADRISK) using a gamma generalised linear model to predict the final microorganism count in the digestate. This research examines the behaviour of a suite of pathogens (Cryptosporidium parvum, norovirus, Mycobacterium spp., Salmonella spp., Listeria monocytogenes, Clostridium spp., and pathogenic Escherichia coli) and indicators (total coliforms, E. coli, and enterococci) during mesophilic anaerobic digestion (M-AD) at 37 °C, pre/post-AD pasteurisation, and after a period of storage (with/without lime) for different feedstock proportions (slurry:food waste: 0:1, 1:3, 2:1, and 3:1). ADRISK tool simulations of faecal indicator bacteria levels across all scenarios show that the digestate can meet the EU standard without pasteurisation if the AD runs at 37 °C or a higher temperature with a higher C:N ratio (recipe 3) and a hydraulic retention time ≥ 7 days. The storage of digestate also reduced levels of microorganisms in the digestate. The Irish pasteurisation process (60 °C for 4 days), although more energy-intensive, is more effective than the EU pasteurisation (70 °C for 1 h) specification. Pre-AD pasteurisation was more effective for C. parvum, norovirus, Mycobacterium thermoresistibile. However, post-AD literature-based pasteurisation is most likely to assure the safety of the digestate. The information generated from this model can inform policy-makers regarding the optimal M-AD process parameters necessary to maximise the inactivation of microorganisms, ensuring adverse environmental impact is minimised, and public health is protected.