1
|
Hannel T, Wei L, Muhammad-Kah RS, Largo EG, Sarkar M. Modeling the population health impact of accurate and inaccurate perceptions of harm from nicotine. Harm Reduct J 2024; 21:145. [PMID: 39123205 PMCID: PMC11312148 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-024-01059-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2023] [Accepted: 07/14/2024] [Indexed: 08/12/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scientific evidence clearly demonstrates that inhaling the smoke from the combustion of cigarettes is responsible for most of the harm caused by smoking, and not the nicotine. However, a majority of U.S. adults who smoke inaccurately believe that nicotine causes cancer which may be a significant barrier, preventing switching to potentially reduced risk, non-combustible products like electronic nicotine delivery systems (ENDS) and smokeless tobacco (ST). We assessed the population health impact associated with nicotine perceptions. METHODS Using a previously validated agent-based model to the U.S. population, we analyzed nationally representative data from the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health (PATH) study to estimate base case rates of sustained (maintained over four waves) cessation and switching to non-combustible product use, by sex. Nicotine perception scenarios were determined from PATH data. The overall switch rate from smoking in Wave 4 to non-combustible product use in Wave 5 (3.94%) was stratified based on responses to the nicotine perception question "Do you believe nicotine is the chemical that causes most of the cancer caused by smoking cigarettes?", (four-item scale from "Definitely not" to "Definitely yes"). The relative percent change between the overall and stratified rates, corresponding to each item, was used to adjust the base case rates of switching, to determine the impact, if all adults who smoke exhibited switching behaviors based on responses to the nicotine perceptions question. The public health impact of nicotine perceptions was estimated as the difference in all-cause mortality between the base case and the four nicotine perception scenarios. RESULTS Switch rates associated with those who responded, "Definitely not" (8.39%) resulted in a net benefit of preventing nearly 800,000 premature deaths over an 85-year period. Conversely switch rates reflective of those who responded, "Definitely yes" (2.59%) resulted in a net harm of nearly 300,000 additional premature deaths over the same period. CONCLUSIONS Accurate knowledge regarding the role of nicotine is associated with higher switch rates and prevention of premature deaths. Our findings suggest that promoting public education to correct perceptions of harm from nicotine has the potential to benefit public health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thaddaeus Hannel
- Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Lai Wei
- Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Raheema S Muhammad-Kah
- Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Edward G Largo
- Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Mohamadi Sarkar
- Altria Client Services LLC Center for Research and Technology, 601 E. Jackson Street, 23219, Richmond, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Puniya BL, Verma M, Damiani C, Bakr S, Dräger A. Perspectives on computational modeling of biological systems and the significance of the SysMod community. BIOINFORMATICS ADVANCES 2024; 4:vbae090. [PMID: 38948011 PMCID: PMC11213628 DOI: 10.1093/bioadv/vbae090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 05/12/2024] [Accepted: 06/14/2024] [Indexed: 07/02/2024]
Abstract
Motivation In recent years, applying computational modeling to systems biology has caused a substantial surge in both discovery and practical applications and a significant shift in our understanding of the complexity inherent in biological systems. Results In this perspective article, we briefly overview computational modeling in biology, highlighting recent advancements such as multi-scale modeling due to the omics revolution, single-cell technology, and integration of artificial intelligence and machine learning approaches. We also discuss the primary challenges faced: integration, standardization, model complexity, scalability, and interdisciplinary collaboration. Lastly, we highlight the contribution made by the Computational Modeling of Biological Systems (SysMod) Community of Special Interest (COSI) associated with the International Society of Computational Biology (ISCB) in driving progress within this rapidly evolving field through community engagement (via both in person and virtual meetings, social media interactions), webinars, and conferences. Availability and implementation Additional information about SysMod is available at https://sysmod.info.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bhanwar Lal Puniya
- Department of Biochemistry, University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, NE 68588, United States
| | - Meghna Verma
- Systems Medicine, Clinical Pharmacology and Quantitative Pharmacology, R&D BioPharmaceuticals, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD 20878, United States
| | - Chiara Damiani
- Department of Biotechnology and Biosciences, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan 20126, Italy
| | - Shaimaa Bakr
- Department of Medicine, Stanford Center for Biomedical Informatics Research (BMIR), Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305-5479, United States
| | - Andreas Dräger
- Computational Systems Biology of Infections and Antimicrobial-Resistant Pathogens, Cluster of Excellence ‘Controlling Microbes to Fight Infections’, Institute for Bioinformatics and Medical Informatics (IBMI), Eberhard Karl University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), partner site Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
- Quantitative Biology Center (QBiC), Eberhard Karl University of Tübingen, Tübingen 72076, Germany
- Data Analytics and Bioinformatics, Institute of Computer Science, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle (Saale) 06120, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Huang V, Head A, Hyseni L, O'Flaherty M, Buchan I, Capewell S, Kypridemos C. Identifying best modelling practices for tobacco control policy simulations: a systematic review and a novel quality assessment framework. Tob Control 2023; 32:589-598. [PMID: 35017262 PMCID: PMC10447402 DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-056825] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 12/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Policy simulation models (PSMs) have been used extensively to shape health policies before real-world implementation and evaluate post-implementation impact. This systematic review aimed to examine best practices, identify common pitfalls in tobacco control PSMs and propose a modelling quality assessment framework. METHODS We searched five databases to identify eligible publications from July 2013 to August 2019. We additionally included papers from Feirman et al for studies before July 2013. Tobacco control PSMs that project tobacco use and tobacco-related outcomes from smoking policies were included. We extracted model inputs, structure and outputs data for models used in two or more included papers. Using our proposed quality assessment framework, we scored these models on population representativeness, policy effectiveness evidence, simulated smoking histories, included smoking-related diseases, exposure-outcome lag time, transparency, sensitivity analysis, validation and equity. FINDINGS We found 146 eligible papers and 25 distinct models. Most models used population data from public or administrative registries, and all performed sensitivity analysis. However, smoking behaviour was commonly modelled into crude categories of smoking status. Eight models only presented overall changes in mortality rather than explicitly considering smoking-related diseases. Only four models reported impacts on health inequalities, and none offered the source code. Overall, the higher scored models achieved higher citation rates. CONCLUSIONS While fragments of good practices were widespread across the reviewed PSMs, only a few included a 'critical mass' of the good practices specified in our quality assessment framework. This framework might, therefore, potentially serve as a benchmark and support sharing of good modelling practices.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincy Huang
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Anna Head
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Lirije Hyseni
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Martin O'Flaherty
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Iain Buchan
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Simon Capewell
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Chris Kypridemos
- Department of Public Health, Policy and Systems, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lee PN, Abrams D, Bachand A, Baker G, Black R, Camacho O, Curtin G, Djurdjevic S, Hill A, Mendez D, Muhammad-Kah RS, Murillo JL, Niaura R, Pithawalla YB, Poland B, Sulsky S, Wei L, Weitkunat R. Estimating the Population Health Impact of Recently Introduced Modified Risk Tobacco Products: A Comparison of Different Approaches. Nicotine Tob Res 2021; 23:426-437. [PMID: 32496514 PMCID: PMC7885777 DOI: 10.1093/ntr/ntaa102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Various approaches have been used to estimate the population health impact of introducing a Modified Risk Tobacco Product (MRTP). Aims and Methods We aimed to compare and contrast aspects of models considering effects on mortality that were known to experts attending a meeting on models in 2018. Results Thirteen models are described, some focussing on e-cigarettes, others more general. Most models are cohort-based, comparing results with or without MRTP introduction. They typically start with a population with known smoking habits and then use transition probabilities either to update smoking habits in the “null scenario” or joint smoking and MRTP habits in an “alternative scenario”. The models vary in the tobacco groups and transition probabilities considered. Based on aspects of the tobacco history developed, the models compare mortality risks, and sometimes life-years lost and health costs, between scenarios. Estimating effects on population health depends on frequency of use of the MRTP and smoking, and the extent to which the products expose users to harmful constituents. Strengths and weaknesses of the approaches are summarized. Conclusions Despite methodological differences, most modellers have assumed the increase in risk of mortality from MRTP use, relative to that from cigarette smoking, to be very low and have concluded that MRTP introduction is likely to have a beneficial impact. Further model development, supplemented by preliminary results from well-designed epidemiological studies, should enable more precise prediction of the anticipated effects of MRTP introduction. Implications There is a need to estimate the population health impact of introducing modified risk nicotine-containing products for smokers unwilling or unable to quit. This paper reviews a variety of modeling methodologies proposed to do this, and discusses the implications of the different approaches. It should assist modelers in refining and improving their models, and help toward providing authorities with more reliable estimates.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter N Lee
- Medical Statistics and Epidemiology, P N Lee Statistics and Computing Ltd, Sutton, Surrey, UK
| | - David Abrams
- Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU School of Public Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Gizelle Baker
- Clinical Science and Epidemiology, Philip Morris R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Ryan Black
- Regulatory Affairs, Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, VA
| | - Oscar Camacho
- Computational Tools and Statistics, British American Tobacco (Investments) Ltd, Group R&D, Southampton, UK
| | - Geoffrey Curtin
- Scientific and Regulatory Affairs, Reynolds American Inc Services Company, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Smilja Djurdjevic
- Clinical Science and Epidemiology, Philip Morris R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| | - Andrew Hill
- Modelling, Ventana Systems UK Ltd, Salisbury, UK
| | - David Mendez
- Department of Health Management and Policy School of Public Health, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | | | | | - Raymond Niaura
- Social and Behavioral Sciences, NYU School of Public Health, New York, NY
| | | | - Bill Poland
- Strategic Consulting, Certara USA Inc, Menlo Park, CA
| | - Sandra Sulsky
- Health Sciences, Ramboll US Corporation, Amherst, MA
| | - Lai Wei
- Regulatory Affairs, Altria Client Services LLC, Richmond, VA
| | - Rolf Weitkunat
- Clinical Science and Epidemiology, Philip Morris R&D, Philip Morris Products SA, Neuchâtel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wei L, Muhammad-Kah RS, Hannel T, Pithawalla YB, Gogova M, Chow S, Black RA. The impact of cigarette and e-cigarette use history on transition patterns: a longitudinal analysis of the population assessment of tobacco and health (PATH) study, 2013-2015. Harm Reduct J 2020; 17:45. [PMID: 32600439 PMCID: PMC7322886 DOI: 10.1186/s12954-020-00386-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/07/2019] [Accepted: 06/03/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Population models have been developed to evaluate the impact of new tobacco products on the overall population. Reliable input parameters such as longitudinal tobacco use transitions are needed to quantify the net population health impact including the number of premature deaths prevented, additional life years, and changes in cigarette smoking prevalence. METHODS This secondary analysis assessed transition patterns from PATH wave 1 (2013-14) to wave 2 (2014-15) among adult exclusive cigarette smokers, exclusive e-cigarette users, and dual users. Transition probabilities were calculated by taking into account factors including cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use histories and experimental or established use behaviors. Multinomial logistic regression models were constructed to further evaluate factors associated with transition patterns. RESULTS Differential transition probabilities emerged among study subgroups when taking into account cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use histories and experimental or established use behaviors. For example, overall 45% of exclusive e-cigarette users in wave 1 continued using e-cigarettes exclusively in wave 2. However, we observed approximately 11 to 14% of wave 1 exclusive experimental e-cigarette users continued to use e-cigarette exclusively in wave 2, compared to about 62% of exclusive established e-cigarette users. The history of cigarette smoking and e-cigarette use is another important factor associated with transition patterns. Among experimental e-cigarette users, 7.5% of individuals without a history of cigarette smoking transitioned to exclusive cigarette smoking, compared to 30% of individuals with a history of cigarette smoking. Additionally, 1.3% of exclusive cigarette smokers in wave 1 transitioned to exclusive e-cigarette use, with the highest transition probability (3.7%) observed in the established cigarette smoker with a history of e-cigarette use subgroup. CONCLUSIONS Product use histories and current use behaviors are important factors influencing transitions between product use states. Given that experimental users' transition behaviors may be more variable and more influenced by tobacco use history, long-term predictions made by population models could be improved by the use of transition probabilities from established users. As transition patterns might be changing over time, long-term transition patterns can be examined through analysis of future waves of PATH data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lai Wei
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
| | - Raheema S. Muhammad-Kah
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
| | - Thaddaeus Hannel
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
| | - Yezdi B. Pithawalla
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
| | - Maria Gogova
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
| | - Simeon Chow
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
| | - Ryan A. Black
- Center for Research & Technology, Altria Client Services LLC, 601 East Jackson Street, Richmond, VA 23219 USA
- RB Research Consulting Firm Inc., Fort Lauderdale, FL 33312 USA
| |
Collapse
|