SettleIN: Using a Manualised Intervention to Facilitate the Adjustment of Older Adults with Dementia Following Placement into Residential Care

Factors associated with adaptation level in the older adult residential care facilities: a path analysis

Background

It has become very common for older adults to relocate to residential care facilities. Yet whether older adults adapt to life in a long-term care residential facility through perception, reflection, and conscious behavioral choices is a challenging social issue. Previous research has shown that adaptation is influenced by physical, mental, psychological, social systems, and other debris factors. However, existing knowledge is often based on unidirectional relationships between these factors and adaptation. Few studies have formally examined bivariate relationships between these factors, and the influence of adaptation between these factors internally remains unclear. Therefore, there is a need to examine the structural causality of adaptation in residential care facilities influenced by a combination of physical, emotional, social and psychological factors, life satisfaction, and social support.

Methods

The present cross-sectional study recruited older adults from three residential care facilities in Henan province, China, through convenience sampling. The Chinese Nursing Home Adjustment Scale (NHAS), Geriatric Depression Scale-15 (GDS-15) and Social Support Scale (SSRS), Satisfaction with Life Scale (SWLS), and Barthel Index were employed to measure the older adult' adjustment level, depression level, social support, satisfaction with life, and self-care ability of the BMC, respectively. The relationships between depression, social support, self-care, satisfaction with life, and adaptation were analyzed and a structural equation model was developed.

Results

A total of 210 participants completed the questionnaire. The model demonstrated an acceptable fit of the data. The results showed that the difference between life satisfaction and depression on the level of adaptation was 60 and 23%, respectively. Social support and life satisfaction had a positive direct effect on the level of adaptation, both showing a positive correlation with the level of adaptation. Depression, on the other hand, have a direct effect on the level of adaptation and showed a negative correlation with the level of adaptation. Self-care ability indirectly influenced adaptation mediated by social support.

Conclusion

Social support has a positive impact on both life satisfaction and depression, which in turn promotes adaptation. As a major source of social support, family members and nursing home staff in residential care facilities can enhance social support for older people through improved interaction, which can have a meaningful and positive impact on levels of adjustment. The model demonstrates the strengthening and weakening of social support, self-care, life satisfaction, and depression levels, which can help inform the development of relevant care health strategies for older people to promote levels of adjustment and improve quality of life.

Trajectory and Predictors of Mental Health Symptoms and Wellbeing in Newly Admitted Nursing Home Residents

OBJECTIVES

This study determined changes in multiple aspects of mental health and wellbeing in newly admitted nursing home residents, and identified risk and protective factors.

METHODS

Participants were 204 residents recently admitted to one of 42 nursing homes in Melbourne, Australia. A subgroup of 82 participants were followed up eight months post-admission. Depression, anxiety, stress, adjustment, and quality of life were assessed at baseline and follow-up. Predictive factors (demographics, health, transition factors, nursing home characteristics) were examined in multiple regression analyses.

RESULTS

Rates of depression and anxiety were high at both baseline and follow-up. Low self-rated health and medical comorbidity predicted poor wellbeing at baseline. Higher perceived control in the relocation to the nursing home and engagement in meaningful activities were associated with better post-admission outcomes. Baseline psychotropic medication use predicted lower anxiety at follow-up but did not impact depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant changes in mental health and wellbeing from one to eight months post-admission. The negative effect of residing in a for-profit nursing home requires further investigation.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Individual activity scheduling and an opportunity to participate in relocation decision-making and planning may support resident wellbeing post-admission.

Program to Enhance Adjustment to Residential Living (PEARL): Effect on Adjustment, Anxiety, Quality of Life, and Stress

OBJECTIVES

The Program to Enhance Adjustment to Residential Living (PEARL) is a five session intervention primarily designed to address high rates of depression in newly admitted residents. This study reports the efficacy of PEARL on secondary outcomes of resident adjustment, symptoms of anxiety, quality of life, and stress.

METHODS

A cluster randomized controlled trial was conducted with 219 newly admitted nursing home residents (M age = 85.5 years) from 42 nursing homes. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and at two and six month post-intervention follow-up, compared to a standard care condition.

RESULTS

There was a significant overall condition by time interaction for adjustment (p = .027) and quality of life (p = .015), but not for stress (p = .309). While the overall condition by time interaction was not significant for anxiety (p = .221), there was a significant interaction contrast six-month post-intervention, indicating a greater decrease in anxiety scores in the intervention group relative to control (p = .039).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the broad effects of PEARL on the wellbeing of newly admitted residents.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

PEARL is a brief intervention that may be feasible for routine use in nursing homes to facilitate adjustment and improve residents' quality of life.

Interventions to Improve the Transition from Home to a Nursing Home: A Scoping Review

Background and Objectives

The transition from home to a nursing home is a stressful event for both older persons and informal caregivers. Currently, this transition process is often fragmented, which can create a vicious cycle of health care-related events. Knowledge of existing care interventions can prevent or break this cycle. This project aims to summarize existing interventions for improving transitional care, identifying their effectiveness and key components.

Research Design and Methods

A scoping review was performed within the European TRANS-SENIOR consortium. The databases PubMed, EMBASE (Excerpta Medica Database), PsycINFO, Medline, and CINAHL (Cumulated Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature) were searched. Studies were included if they described interventions designed to improve the transition from home to a nursing home.

Results

17 studies were identified, describing 13 interventions. The majority of these interventions focused on nursing home adjustment with 1 study including the entire transition pathway. The study identified 8 multicomponent and 5 single-component interventions. From the multicomponent interventions, 7 main components were identified: education, relationships/communication, improving emotional well-being, personalized care, continuity of care, support provision, and ad hoc counseling. The study outcomes were heterogeneous, making them difficult to compare. The study outcomes varied, with studies often reporting nonsignificant changes for the main outcome measures.

Discussion and Implications

There is a mismatch between the theory on optimal transitional care and current transitional care interventions, as they often lack a comprehensive approach. This research is the first step toward a uniform definition of optimal transitional care and a tool to improve/develop (future) transitional care initiatives on the pathway from home to a nursing home.

Effectiveness of Resilience Interventions on Psychosocial Outcomes for Persons With Neurocognitive Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Neurocognitive disorders, such as mild cognitive impairment (MCI), dementia, and Alzheimer's disease, not only harm people's cognitive function but also lead to negative emotions, poor quality of life (QOL), and unsatisfactory level of well-being. Resilience can be defined as a dynamic and amendable process, which maintains or improves life satisfaction and quick recovery from own dilemma. However, no meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has thus far examined the effectiveness of resilience interventions among persons with neurocognitive disorders, and the results of RCTs were inconsistent. This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of resilience interventions on psychosocial outcomes among persons with neurocognitive disorders. Methods: Nine electronic Chinese and English databases (the Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Web of Science, PubMed, Medline, Eric, JSTOR, CNKI, and WANGFANG) were searched through April 2021. Only RCTs were included, and the quality of the included studies was assessed by the Cochrane "Risk of Bias" tool. Meta-analysis was carried out on psychosocial outcomes, and heterogeneity was investigated by subgroup and sensitivity analysis. RevMan 5.4 was used for meta-analysis. Results: Fourteen RCT studies were identified, representing a total of 2,442 participants with neurocognitive disorders. The risk of bias was high or unclear for most included studies in the domains of allocation concealment, blinding participants, and interventionists. Meta-analysis showed that heterogeneity was low or moderate. There were significant differences in favor of resilience interventions compared with control on the outcome of QOL, using the Quality of Life-Alzheimer Disease scale (QOL-AD) [I ² = 36%, standardized mean difference (SMD) = 0.14, 95% CI (0.02, 0.26), p = 0.02], and no significant differences on depression, using the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) [I ² = 41%, SMD = -0.14, 95% CI (-0.34, 0.05), p = 0.16], and neuropsychiatric symptoms using the Neuropsychiatric Inventory Questionnaire (NPI-Q) [I ² = 62%, SMD = -0.10, 95% CI (-0.37, -0.16), p ≤ 0.46]. Conclusions: Resilience interventions had a significant benefit on QOL but no significant benefit on depression and neuropsychiatric behavioral symptoms. More evidence is needed to answer questions about how to implement resilience interventions and how to evaluate their effectiveness.