Two-Phase Evaluation of a Community-Based Lifestyle Intervention for Palestinian Women in East Jerusalem: A Quasi-Experimental Study Followed by Dissemination

After Theranos: Using point-of-care testing to advance measures of health biomarkers in human biology research

OBJECTIVES

The rise and fall of the health technology startup Theranos is emblematic of the promise and peril of point-of-care testing (POCT). Instruments that deliver immediate results from minimally invasive samples at the location of collection can provide powerful tools to deliver health data in clinical and public health contexts. Yet, POCT availability is driven largely by market interests, which limits the development of inexpensive tests for diverse health conditions that can be used in resource-limited settings. These constraints, combined with complex regulatory hurdles and substantial ethical challenges, have contributed to the underutilization of POCT in human biology research.

METHODS

We evaluate current POCT capabilities and limitations, discuss promising applications for POCT devices in resource-limited settings, and discuss the future of POCT.

RESULTS

As evidenced by publication trends, POCT platforms have rapidly advanced in recent years, gaining traction among clinicians and health researchers. We highlight POCT devices of potential interest to population-based researchers and present specific examples of POCT applications in human biology research.

CONCLUSIONS

Several barriers can limit POCT applications, including cost, lack of regulatory approval for non-clinical use, requirements for expensive equipment, and the dearth of validation in remote field conditions. Despite these issues, we see immense potential for emerging POCT technology capable of analyzing new sample types and used in conjunction with increasingly common technology (e.g., smart phones). We argue that the fallout from Theranos may ultimately provide an opportunity to advance POCT, leading to more ethical data collection and novel opportunities in human biology research.

Effects in Israel of Arab and Jewish Ethnicity on Intracerebral Hemorrhage

Intracerebral hemorrhages (ICH) characteristics reportedly differ between different ethnic groups. We aimed to compare the characteristics of Jewish and Arab ICH patients in Israel. Consecutive patients with primary ICH were included in a prospective institutional database. Demographics, vascular risk factors, clinical and radiological parameters were compared between Arab and Jewish ICH patients residing in Jerusalem. The study included 455 patients (311 Jews). Arab patients were younger (66.1 ± 13.4 vs. 72.2 ± 12.2 years, p < 0.001) and had higher rates of diabetes (60% vs. 29%, p < 0.001) and smoking (26% vs. 11%, p < 0.001). Arab patients had higher rates of deep ICH (74% vs. 62%, p = 0.01) and lower rates of lobar ICH (18% vs. 31%, p = 0.003). In a sub-analysis of deep ICH patients only, Arab patients were younger (64.3 ± 12.9 vs. 71.4 ± 11.8 years, p < 0.001) and less frequently male (56% vs. 68%, p = 0.042), with higher rates of diabetes (61% vs. 35%, p < 0.001) and smoking (31% vs. 14%, p < 0.001). In conclusion, the two ethnic populations in Israel differ in the causes and attributes of ICH. Heavy smoking and poorly controlled diabetes are commonly associated with deep ICH in the Arab population and may offer specific targets for secondary prevention in this population.