Increased Alopecia Areata Risk in Children with Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder and the Impact of Methylphenidate Use: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study

Efficacy and Safety of Methylphenidate and Atomoxetine in Medication-Naive Children with Attention-Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder in a Real-World Setting

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Methylphenidate (MPH) and atomoxetine (ATX) are the most common medications used to treat attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in China; however, despite this, there is still a paucity of studies comparing their efficacy and safety, particularly for different characteristics. To address the lack of research, a real-world prospective cohort study was conducted to examine these properties of MPH and ATX, and to analyze correlations associated with age, sex, and different ADHD presentation.

METHODS

Children with ADHD meeting the eligibility criteria were recruited from January 2016 to July 2021. Study participants were treated with either MPH or ATX prescribed in the real-world setting, and were followed up for 26 weeks. Clinical efficacy response and adverse events (AEs) were recorded and measured. Subgroup analysis was performed to examine the efficacy response and AEs associated with age, sex, and different ADHD presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 1050 children were recruited and 29 children were lost to follow-up. Of the 1021 children remaining, 533 were treated with MPH and 488 were treated with ATX. No significant differences were found in intelligence quotient, age, sex, or ADHD presentation between the MPH- and ATX-treated groups (p > 0.05). The response rates were 84.6% in the MPH-treated group and 63.3% in the ATX-treated group. Subgroup analysis of response rate demonstrated that the treatment effect of MPH over ATX was consistent across subgroups except in the girls (odds ratio [OR] 2.09, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.97-4.7) and the hyperactive/impulsive presentation group (OR 2.88, 95% CI 0.77-12.76). A total of 47.8% of children experienced AEs during MPH treatment, significantly lower than the rate of 56.8% during ATX treatment (p < 0.05). The incidence of AEs in the MPH-treated group was higher in young children (<8 years: 56.8%; 8-10 years: 47.2%) and lower in children over 10 years of age (29.0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, MPH was more effective and better tolerated than ATX. The incidence of AEs in children treated with MPH varied with age, and was higher in young children and lower in children over 10 years of age.

Early systemic inflammation induces neurodevelopmental disorders: results from ARTEMIS, a French multicenter study of juvenile rheumatisms and systemic autoimmune and auto-inflammatory disorders and meta-analysis

Prenatal immune-mediated events are known risk factors for neurodevelopmental disorders in the offspring (NDD). Although the brain continues to develop for years after birth and many postnatal factors alter the regular trajectory of neurodevelopment, little is known about the impact of postnatal immune factors. To fill this gap we set up ARTEMIS, a cohort of juvenile rheumatisms and systemic autoimmune and auto-inflammatory disorders (jRSAID), and assessed their neurodevelopment. We then complemented our results with a systematic review and meta-analysis. In ARTEMIS, we used unsupervised and supervised analysis to determine the influence of jRSAID age at onset (AO) and delay in introduction of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on NDD (NCT04814862). For the meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, Cochrane, and Web of Science up to April 2022 without any restrictions on language, or article type for studies investigating the co-occurence of jRSAID and NDD (PROSPERO- CRD42020150346). 195 patients were included in ARTEMIS. Classification tree isolated 3 groups of patients (i) A low-risk group (AO > 130 months (m)) with 5% of NDD (ii) A medium-risk group (AO < 130 m and DMT < 2 m) with 20% of NDD (iii) and a high-risk-group (AO < 130 m and DMT > 2 m) with almost half of NDD. For the meta-analysis, 18 studies encompassing a total of (i) 46,267 children with jRSAID; 213,930 children with NDD, and 6,213,778 children as controls were included. We found a positive association between jRSAID and NDD with an OR = 1.44 [95% CI 1.31; 1.57] p < 0.0001, [I² = 66%, Tau² = 0.0067, p < 0.01]. Several sensitivity analyses were performed without changing the results. Metaregression confirmed the importance of AO (p = 0.005). Our study supports the association between jRSAID and NDD. AO and DMT have pivotal roles in the risk of developing NDD. We plead for systematic screening of NDD in jRSAID to prevent the functional impact of NDD.