1
|
Ignacio-Rodríguez I, Barcala-Furelos R, Rey E, Sanmartín-Montes M. Do Longer Fins Improve Ocean Rescues? A Comprehensive Investigation into Lifeguard Performance and Physiological Impact. J Funct Morphol Kinesiol 2024; 9:79. [PMID: 38651437 PMCID: PMC11204723 DOI: 10.3390/jfmk9020079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 04/10/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 04/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Coastal environments present dynamic challenges necessitating rapid and efficient responses during aquatic emergencies. Lifeguards, as pivotal links in the intervention chain, rely on various tools, with rescue time being paramount. The choice of fins, specifically long versus short ones, plays a critical role in optimizing lifeguard performance during rescues. This randomized cross-over study explores the impact of flipper size on ocean rescues, employing a sample of 14 lifeguards. Long fins (LFs) and short fins (SFs) were compared in terms of rescue time (RT) and physiological load (PL). Tests included ocean rescues without fins (R), with LF (R-LF), and with SF (R-SF). Variables recorded encompassed swim approach time, tow-in time, overall rescue time, perceived exertion rates (RPEs), and post-rescue lactate concentration. Long fins demonstrated superior performance in swim approach and tow-in times compared to both short fins and no fins (p < 0.001). Overall rescue time favored long fins significantly (p < 0.001), indicating their efficiency in practical ocean rescue scenarios. Physiologically, long fins induced lower perceived exertion in arms (p = 0.033) compared to short fins. Lactate concentrations post-rescue revealed no significant differences (p > 0.05). This study demonstrates that long fins significantly improve lifeguard performance during ocean rescues, reducing rescue times and alleviating arm fatigue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Roberto Barcala-Furelos
- REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain; (I.I.-R.); (E.R.); (M.S.-M.)
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Barcala-Furelos R, Barcala-Furelos M, Cano-Noguera F, Otero-Agra M, Alonso-Calvete A, Martínez-Isasi S, Aranda-García S, López-García S, Rodríguez-Núñez A. A Comparison between Three Different Techniques Considering Quality Skills, Fatigue and Hand Pain during a Prolonged Infant Resuscitation: A Cross-Over Study with Lifeguards. CHILDREN (BASEL, SWITZERLAND) 2022; 9:children9060910. [PMID: 35740847 PMCID: PMC9221895 DOI: 10.3390/children9060910] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2022] [Revised: 05/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
The aim of the study was to compare the quality of CPR (Q-CPR), as well as the perceived fatigue and hand pain in a prolonged infant cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) performed by lifeguards using three different techniques. A randomized crossover simulation study was used to compare three infant CPR techniques: the two-finger technique (TF); the two-thumb encircling technique (TTE) and the two-thumb-fist technique (TTF). 58 professional lifeguards performed three tests in pairs during a 20-min period of CPR. The rescuers performed compressions and ventilations in 15:2 cycles and changed their roles every 2 min. The variables of analysis were CPR quality components, rate of perceived exertion (RPE) and hand pain with numeric rating scale (NRS). All three techniques showed high Q-CPR results (TF: 86 ± 9%/TTE: 88 ± 9%/TTF: 86 ± 16%), and the TTE showed higher values than the TF (p = 0.03). In the RPE analysis, fatigue was not excessive with any of the three techniques (values 20 min between 3.2 for TF, 2.4 in TTE and 2.5 in TTF on a 10-point scale). TF reached a higher value in RPE than TTF in all the intervals analyzed (p < 0.05). In relation to NRS, TF showed significantly higher values than TTE and TTF (NRS minute 20 = TF 4.7 vs. TTE 2.5 & TTF 2.2; p < 0.001). In conclusion, all techniques have been shown to be effective in high-quality infant CPR in a prolonged resuscitation carried out by lifeguards. However, the two-finger technique is less efficient in relation to fatigue and hand pain compared with two-thumb technique (TF vs. TTF, p = 0.01).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Barcala-Furelos
- REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain; (R.B.-F.); (M.O.-A.); (A.A.-C.)
| | - Martín Barcala-Furelos
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universidad Europea del Atlántico, 39011 Santander, Spain
- Faculty of Education, Pontifical University of Salamanca, 37002 Salamanca, Spain;
- Correspondence:
| | - Francisco Cano-Noguera
- INGESPORT Research Group, Department of Physical Activity and Sports, University of Murcia, 30720 San Javier, Spain;
| | - Martín Otero-Agra
- REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain; (R.B.-F.); (M.O.-A.); (A.A.-C.)
| | - Alejandra Alonso-Calvete
- REMOSS Research Group, Faculty of Education and Sport Sciences, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain; (R.B.-F.); (M.O.-A.); (A.A.-C.)
- Facultade de Fisioterapia, Universidade de Vigo, 36005 Pontevedra, Spain
| | - Santiago Martínez-Isasi
- Research, Health and Podiatry Unit, Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Nursing and Podiatry, Universidade da Coruña, 15071 A Coruña, Spain;
| | - Silvia Aranda-García
- National Institute of Physical Education of Catalonia, Barcelona University, 08038 Barcelona, Spain;
| | - Sergio López-García
- Faculty of Education, Pontifical University of Salamanca, 37002 Salamanca, Spain;
| | - Antonio Rodríguez-Núñez
- Paediatric Intensive Care, Paediatric Intermediate Care and Palliative Care Units, Department of Paediatrics, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| |
Collapse
|