Offender Recovery. Forensic Patient Perspectives on Long-Term Personal Recovery Processes

Forensic Psychiatric Patients' Experiences of Personal Recovery: A Wilsonian Concept Analysis

ABSTRACT

Psychiatric patients' recovery processes have been studied rather extensively, and a relatively clear consensus on what recovery is already exists. We examined whether the personal recovery of forensic psychiatric patients varies from this definition. We conducted a concept analysis to assess the personal recovery of patients in forensic psychiatric hospitals based on 21 articles and then evaluated how our results compared with existing definitions on psychiatric and forensic recovery. On the basis of this comparison, we concluded that the personal recovery of forensic psychiatric patients does differ from that of other psychiatric patients. The recovery process of forensic psychiatric patients can be described through five themes: personal development and autonomy, social inclusion and normality, redemption and overcoming, future orientation and hope, and advancing process. The burden of a psychiatric disorder causes similar challenges, yet a criminal history and long hospitalization periods are distinctive issues for forensic patients, both of which can lead to severe alienation from society and deterioration of skills needed in life outside an institution. The results suggest that processing the criminal offense should be part of the care; furthermore, institutions should support forensic psychiatric patients in their reintegration into society and personal development. Identifying special recovery challenges can be useful when designing effective care and promoting the recovery of forensic patients. Thus, our results suggest that certain features of forensic psychiatric patients' recovery should be considered when planning their psychiatric care.

The experience of nurses moving into forensic mental health employment: A qualitative study

While forensic mental health has seen considerable growth over the last two decades, little is known about the experience of registered nurses working in these environments. This study used a qualitative descriptive approach and interviewed 11 registered nurses to explore the interpersonal experiences of transition into a forensic mental health hospital. The data revealed three themes. 'Observing what's safe' examined nurses' ability to maintain safety in the context of inconsistent practices among colleagues. 'Navigating cliques and divisions' focused on nurses' sense of belonging and adapting to professional and personal groups. Finally, 'gaining management support' reflected nurses' experiences of engagement with management. This study provides new insight into nurses' experience of adapting to employment in forensic mental health settings and highlights the importance of positive support strategies for workplace transition.

Effects of Implementing the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability for Mechanical Restraint in a Forensic Male Population: A Stepped-Wedge, Cluster-Randomized Design

The assessment and formulation of the risk of violence and other unwanted behaviors at forensic psychiatric facilities have been attempted for decades. Structured professional judgment tools, such as the Short-Term Assessment of Risk and Treatability (START), are among the recent attempts to overcome the challenge of accomplishing these goals. This study examined the effect of implementing START in clinical practice for the most serious adverse events among the target group of severely mentally ill forensic psychiatric inpatients. Results were based on the use of mechanical restraints as an outcome. This study is a pragmatic, stepped-wedge, cluster-randomized controlled trial and was conducted over 5 years. It included eight forensic psychiatric units. Fifty out of 156 patients who had a basic aggression score of more than 0 were included in the study. We found that the rate of mechanical restraint use within the START period were 82% [relative risk (RR) = 0.18], lower than those outside of the START period. Patients evaluated within the START period were also found to have a 36% (RR = 0.64) lower risk of having higher Brøset Violence Checklist scores than patients evaluated outside the START period. Previous studies on START have primarily focused on validation, the predictive capability of the assessment, and implementation. We were only able to identify one study that aimed to identify the benefits and outcomes of START in a forensic setting. This study showed a significant reduction in the chance for inpatients in a forensic psychiatric facility to become mechanically restrained during periods where the START was used as risk assessment.