Impact of Diabetes on Cardiac Function in Patients with High Blood Pressure

Concentric hypertrophy geometry is a significant determinant of impaired global longitudinal strain in patients with normal cardiac structure and function

Background

In recent years, the assessment of global longitudinal strain (GLS) derived by speckle-tracking analysis has become a clinically feasible alternative to left ventricular (LV) ejection fraction (LVEF) for the assessment of myocardial function. However, the determinant factors of impaired GLS in structurally and functionally normal patients are unclarified. The objective of this study was to elucidate the determinant factors of impaired GLS in structurally and functionally normal patients.

Methods

We evaluated structurally and functionally normal patients scheduled to undergo noncardiac surgery. The evaluated patient characteristics were age, sex, presence of hypertension, presence of diabetes mellitus, presence of hyperlipidemia, systolic blood pressure, and body mass index. The concentrations of B-type natriuretic peptide and high-sensitivity troponin I were measured. Echocardiography was performed to determine the LVEF, GLS, transmitral early diastolic velocity/transmitral atrial velocity ratio, LV mass index (LVMI), and relative wall thickness (RWT). Patients with preserved LVEF (≥50%) were divided into the normal GLS group (GLS ≤ -20%) and the impaired GLS group (GLS > -20%). On the basis of the RWT and LVMI values, the patients were categorized as having four types of LV geometry. Logistic regression analysis was performed to ascertain the determinant factors of impaired GLS.

Results

The study cohort comprised 75 structurally and functionally normal patients (age 67.7 ± 12.6 years, 45 men). The GLS was normal in 43 patients and impaired in 32 patients. There was a significant difference in RWT between the impaired and normal GLS groups. The evaluation based on the LV geometry showed that six of seven patients with concentric hypertrophy geometry had impaired GLS, and the GLS was significantly more impaired in patients with concentric hypertrophy geometry than in patients with normal geometry or eccentric hypertrophy geometry. Logistic regression analysis revealed that LV concentric hypertrophy geometry was a significant determinant factor of impaired GLS (odds ratio 22.4, P = 0.042).

Conclusions

Global longitudinal strain is more impaired in structurally and functionally normal patients with concentric hypertrophy geometry compared with those with eccentric hypertrophy geometry or normal geometry. In addition, concentric hypertrophy geometry is a significant determinant for impaired GLS in patients with normal cardiac structure and function.

Hemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with preserved ejection fraction is an independent predictor of left ventricular myocardial deformation and tissue abnormalities

BACKGROUND

Early detection of subclinical myocardial dysfunction in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is essential for preventing heart failure. This study aims to search for predictors of left ventricular (LV) myocardial deformation and tissue abnormalities in T2DM patients with preserved ejection fraction by using CMR T1 mapping and feature tracking.

METHODS

70 patients and 44 sex- and age-matched controls (Cs) were recruited and underwent CMR examination to obtain LV myocardial extracellular volume fraction (ECV) and global longitudinal strain (GLS). The patients were subdivided into three groups, including 19 normotensive T2DM patients (G1), 19 hypertensive T2DM patients (G2) and 32 hypertensive patients (HT). The baseline biochemical indices were collected before CMR examination.

RESULTS

LV ECV in T2DM patients was significantly higher than that in Cs (30.75 ± 3.65% vs. 26.33 ± 2.81%; p < 0.05). LV GLS in T2DM patients reduced compared with that in Cs (-16.51 ± 2.53% vs. -19.66 ± 3.21%, p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis, ECV in G2 increased compared with that in G1 (31.92 ± 3.05% vs. 29.59 ± 3.90%, p = 0.032) and that in HT, too (31.92 ± 3.05% vs. 29.22 ± 6.58%, p = 0.042). GLS in G2 significantly reduced compared with that in G1 (-15.75 ± 2.29% vs. -17.27 ± 2.57%, p < 0.05) and in HT, too (-15.75 ± 2.29% vs. -17.54 ± 3.097%, p < 0.05). In T2DM group, including both G1 and G2, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) can independently forecast the increase in ECV (β = 0.274, p = 0.001) and decrease in GLS (β = 0.383, p = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

T2DM patients with preserved ejection fraction show increased ECV but deteriorated GLS, which may be exacerbated by hypertension of these patients. Hemoglobin A1c is an index that can independently predict T2DM patients' LV myocardial deformation and tissue abnormalities.

American Association of Clinical Endocrinology Clinical Practice Guideline: Developing a Diabetes Mellitus Comprehensive Care Plan-2022 Update

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this clinical practice guideline is to provide updated and new evidence-based recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes mellitus to clinicians, diabetes-care teams, other health care professionals and stakeholders, and individuals with diabetes and their caregivers.

METHODS

The American Association of Clinical Endocrinology selected a task force of medical experts and staff who updated and assessed clinical questions and recommendations from the prior 2015 version of this guideline and conducted literature searches for relevant scientific papers published from January 1, 2015, through May 15, 2022. Selected studies from results of literature searches composed the evidence base to update 2015 recommendations as well as to develop new recommendations based on review of clinical evidence, current practice, expertise, and consensus, according to established American Association of Clinical Endocrinology protocol for guideline development.

RESULTS

This guideline includes 170 updated and new evidence-based clinical practice recommendations for the comprehensive care of persons with diabetes. Recommendations are divided into four sections: (1) screening, diagnosis, glycemic targets, and glycemic monitoring; (2) comorbidities and complications, including obesity and management with lifestyle, nutrition, and bariatric surgery, hypertension, dyslipidemia, retinopathy, neuropathy, diabetic kidney disease, and cardiovascular disease; (3) management of prediabetes, type 2 diabetes with antihyperglycemic pharmacotherapy and glycemic targets, type 1 diabetes with insulin therapy, hypoglycemia, hospitalized persons, and women with diabetes in pregnancy; (4) education and new topics regarding diabetes and infertility, nutritional supplements, secondary diabetes, social determinants of health, and virtual care, as well as updated recommendations on cancer risk, nonpharmacologic components of pediatric care plans, depression, education and team approach, occupational risk, role of sleep medicine, and vaccinations in persons with diabetes.

CONCLUSIONS

This updated clinical practice guideline provides evidence-based recommendations to assist with person-centered, team-based clinical decision-making to improve the care of persons with diabetes mellitus.