Factors Influencing the Willingness of Palliative Care Utilization among the Older Population with Active Cancers: A Case Study in Mandalay, Myanmar

Relationship Between Religion/Spirituality and the Aggressiveness of Cancer Care: A Scoping Review

CONTEXT

Religiosity/spirituality/religious-spiritual coping (RS) are resources used by cancer patients with cancer to help cope with the disease and may influence the preference and receipt of end-of-life (EOL) treatment.

OBJECTIVES

To examine the relationship between RS and the EOL care preferred or received by cancer patients.

METHODS

This review protocol is registered on (International Prospective Register of Systematic Review, CRD42021251833) and follows the recommendations of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses checklist. Embase, Proquest, PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases were consulted. Google Scholar was consulted for additional publications and gray literature. Quantitative studies including adults with any cancer type/stage were eligible. The paper selection was performed by two independent reviewers; the methodological quality was measured using the Newcastle Ottawa scale.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies were included in the review. In general, RS is related to the preference or receipt of aggressive EOL care and with less advance care planning. Spiritual care by the medical team is related to higher referral to hospice and less aggressive care; in contrast, high spiritual support from religious communities is associated with less hospice and more aggressive care. Religious denominations influenced health care preferences, as Catholics were less likely to sign a do-not-resuscitate order and Buddhists or Taoists received more aggressive interventions at the EOL. Most studies (70%) were of high quality according to the Newcastle Ottawa scale.

CONCLUSION

RS is associated with more aggressive EOL treatments, as well as with lower rates of ACP in cancer patients. On the other hand, spiritual care provided by the medical team seems to be associated with less aggressive EOL care.

Overview on development of ASEAN traditional and herbal medicines

Traditional medicine is an important and often underestimated part of health services. In some countries, it has a long history of use in health maintenance and in disease prevention and treatment, particularly for disease. WHO has always emphasized the important role of traditional, complementary and alternative medicine in human healthcare. In this review article, the author provided some information from the following five aspects: (1) Development basis of China ASEAN traditional medicine and herbal medicine; (2) The development and afficacy of traditional medicine theory system; (3) Industry development and regulation management of traditional medicine and herbal medicine products; (4) China-ASEAN traditional medicine exchanges and cooperation to promote traditional medicine cooperation and medicine trade, and (5) Strengthening academic and industrial cooperation and promoting the healthy development of traditional medicine and herbal medicine. It is believed that the information will have certain reference value for readers in studies on traditional and herbal medicines.