Effect of Exposure Angulation on the Occupational Radiation Exposure during Cardiac Angiography: Simulation Study

Evaluation of radiation protection effectivity in a cardiac angiography room using visualized scattered radiation distribution

In this study, we devised a radiation protection tool specifically designed for healthcare professionals and students engaged in cardiac catheterization to easily monitor and evaluate scattered radiation distribution across diverse C-arm angles and arbitrary physician associated staff positions-scrub nurse and technologist positions. In this study, scattered radiation distributions in an angiography room were calculated using the Monte Carlo simulation of particle and heavy ion transport code system (PHITS) code. Four visualizations were performed under different C-arm angles with and without radiation protection: (1) a dose profile, (2) a 2D cross-section, (3) a 3D scattered radiation distribution, and (4) a 4D scattered radiation distribution. The simulation results detailing the scattered radiation distribution in PHITS were exported in Visualization Toolkit format and visualized through the open-source visualization application ParaView for analysis. Visualization of the scattered dose showed that dose distribution depends on the C-arm angle and the x-ray machine output parameters (kV, mAs s-1, beam filtration) which depend upon beam angulation to the patient body. When irradiating in the posterior-anterior direction, the protective curtain decreased the dose by 62% at a point 80 cm from the floor, where the physician's gonads are positioned. Placing the protection board close to the x-ray tube reduced the dose by 24% at a location 160 cm from the floor, where the lens of the eye is situated. Notably, positioning the protection board adjacent to the physician resulted in a 95.4% reduction in incident air kerma. These visualization displays can be combined to understand the spread and direction of the scattered radiation distribution and to determine where and how to operate and place radiation protection devices, accounting for the different beam angulations encountered in interventional cases. This study showed that scatter visualization could be a radiation protection teaching aid for students and medical staff in angiography rooms.

Operator radiation exposure during radioembolisation of the liver: transfemoral versus transradial access using real-time dose monitoring

In this study, operator radiation exposure is compared utilising transradial access (TRA) versus transfemoral access (TFA) during transarterial radioembolisation (TARE) of liver tumors. Patients who underwent Y90 TARE between May 2017 and April 2018 were included. Electronic medical records and interventional data were collected and the following parameters evaluated: technical success, fluoroscopy time, operator radiation exposure and rate of operator radiation exposure per fluoroscopy time. Statistical analysis was performed with the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. A total of 22 patients (12 males, 10 females) underwent 22 procedures. A total of 12 procedures were performed via TFA and 10 via TRA. Technical success was 100% in both groups. Median fluoroscopy time (10 minutes for TRA vs 6.4 minutes for TFA, p = 0.082) was not statistically different. Both operator radiation exposure (49 vs 4.2 μSv, p = 0.00016) and rate of operator exposure (4.9 vs 0.71 μSv per min, p = 0.00021) were significantly higher in the TRA versus TFA groups, respectively.

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling: Procedural data from a German single-center study

PURPOSE

To assess radiation exposure and diagnostic performance of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling for the distinction of pituitary and ectopic adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Procedural data of bilateral inferior petrosal sinus procedures were retrospectively evaluated. The analysis included the patients' clinical and demographic data, procedural radiation exposure, and complication rates, sampling results, clinical course of the patients, and calculation of diagnostic performance data.

RESULTS

The cases of 46 patients diagnosed with adrenocorticotropin-dependent Cushing's syndrome were evaluated. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling was successfully performed in 97.8 % of the cases. The overall median procedure-related fluoroscopy time was 7.8 min. (range 3.2-36.2 min.), and the median procedural dose area product was 11.9 Gy*cm2 (range 2.1-73.7 Gy*cm2). Radiation doses due to digital subtraction angiography series for visualization of the inferior petrosal sinus were 3.6 Gy*cm2 (range 1.0-18.1 Gy*cm2). Radiation doses due to fluoroscopy had a higher impact on the overall radiation exposure and were significantly influenced by the patients' habitus. The sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values were 84 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 72 % before stimulation with corticotropin-releasing hormone, and 97 %, 100 %, 100 %, and 93 % after stimulation. Concordance between magnetic resonance imaging studies and bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling results was only found in 35.6 % of the cases. The periprocedural complication rate was 2.2 %, with one patient experiencing vasovagal syncope during catheterization.

CONCLUSION

Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling is a safe procedure with high technical success rates und excellent diagnostic performance. The procedure-related radiation exposure shows large variations and depends on the complexity of cannulation as well as the patients' habitus. Fluoroscopy accounted for the largest proportion of radiation exposure. Acquisition of digital subtraction angiography series for the verification of correct catheter placement appears justified.

KEY POINTS

· Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling with CRH stimulation provides high diagnostic performance in the distinction of pituitary and ectopic Cushing's syndrome.. · The associated radiation exposure is not negligible and is significantly influenced by the use of fluoroscopy and the patients' habitus.. · Digital subtraction angiography contributes less to the overall radiation dose and appears justified for the verification of correct catheter placement..

CITATION FORMAT

· Augustin A, Detomas M, Hartung V et al. Bilateral inferior petrosal sinus sampling: Procedural data from a German single-center study. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2023; 195: 1009 - 1017.

Radiation dose evaluation to organs in neonatal patients by field size during potable X-ray examination in incubators: A Monte Carlo simulation study

BACKGROUND

Neonatal patients located in incubators are exposed to as many as 159 radiographs until discharge. To reduce the dose exposed to the patient, factors that may cause unnecessary exposure to the patient were judged. When conducting portable X-rays of neonatal patients located in an incubator, it is not easy to determine the exact field size because collimation light is exposed on the acrylic plate, an incubator canopy, and the resulting shadow is reflected on the patient's body.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to measure the organ dose exposed to the patient according to the field size when a portable radiograph is given to a neonatal patient in a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) incubator.

METHODS

To identify the absorbed organ dose depending on the radiation field size during portable X-ray examination of neonatal patient, a Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) simulation, a SpeckCalc program, and a neonatal phantom from the ICRP 89 are applied for the calculation. According to the minimal field size (MinFS) standards of the European Commission (EC), the smaller field size is intended to measure tightly from the top of the lung apices to the bottom of the genitals; a larger field size is also calculated by adding 6 cm in width and length.

RESULTS

Compared to the hospital C condition from the previous study, the larger and smaller field sizes are decreased by an average of 45% and 67%, respectively. Study results also show a 42% reduction in smaller field size compared to the larger field size.

CONCLUSION

When taking chest and abdomen radiographic images of neonatal patients in incubators, appropriate field sizes are required to prevent inappropriate dose absorption for non-thoracic organs.

Evaluation of radiation dose to organs of neonatal patients during portable X-ray examination in incubators: A Monte Carlo simulation study

BACKGROUND

Infants admitted to neonate intensive care units (NICUs) are placed in incubators to maintain body temperature and condition, which undergo normal radiographs and are exposed to radiation. Furthermore, different incubator structures in different hospitals exhibit varying object to image receptor distance (OID), source to image receptor distance (SID), presence of canopy, which results in variations in X-ray radiation conditions and doses absorbed by the neonatal patients.

OBJECTIVE

To measure organ dose exposed to neonatal patient in different incubator settings.

METHODS

A portable X-ray was performed on a neonatal patient placed in an incubator to identify disease progress, the injection path of the drug, and various factors. To minimize direct contact between neonatal patients and image receptor, radiologic technologists place the image receptor on a tray underneath the incubator and place the portable X-ray tube on top of the acrylic canopy of the incubators. SID and OID settings and value of organ dose exposed to the patient varied based on the incubator structure, and the organ absorbed dose was determined using Monte Carlo N-Particle (MCNP) simulation, PC-based Monte Carlo program (PCXMC) 2.0 simulation, and neonate phantoms.

RESULTS

Evaluations of organ dose of neonatal patients in three hospitals with different incubator settings reveal that the average organ dose differs by 36% depending on change in OID and SID settings and reduces by 10% with an acrylic canopy. Therefore, owing to the presence of an acrylic canopy on the top of the incubator and the longer SID with the corresponding shorter OID, a lower dose was absorbed by organs of neonatal patient.

CONCLUSION

Our results provide proof that proper incubator standard decreases organ dose to neonatal patient during continuously diagnostic X-ray procedure.