Geography as a Determinant of Health: Health Services Utilization of Pediatric Respiratory Illness in a Canadian Province

Socioeconomic Determinants of Health: Remoteness From Care

Remoteness from care remains a major challenge to equitable provision of health services worldwide. Beyond the difficulties associated with geographically and climatically rugged terrain, there are also socioeconomic, cultural, and technological challenges associated with remote residence. The objective of this review is to examine the factors whereby remoteness can be associated with sociodemographic disadvantage in health care and describe some of the methodologies for measurement and analysis of remoteness, with examples from the literature, particularly focusing on Canada. As surrogates for remoteness, simple measurements of direct distance or travel time may correlate well with more complex measures and can be performed relative to specific health care services of interest (for example, tertiary obstetric service). These metrics may also be measured, as general proxies for service availability, to various sizes of population centres. More complex measures of remoteness may also incorporate modes of available transport and availability of specific services into an index such as the Canadian Index of Remoteness. As an important independent predictor of health, remoteness requires careful predictive modelling because of potential complex nonlinear relationships, edge effects created by health system zone boundaries, and covariance with other sociodemographic factors and Indigenous population proportions. To combat disadvantage caused by remoteness, innovation in health service delivery, policy, and technology is required. Health-resource allocation must be adequate, and innovative technological advances-such as remote monitoring, expert clinical support, and artificial intelligence algorithms-must be supported by development of appropriate technological infrastructure, targeting remote regions. With these, the barriers to equitable health imposed by remoteness can be overcome.

Grounding Wellness: Coloniality, Placeism, Land, and a Critique of "Social" Determinants of Indigenous Mental Health in the Canadian Context

Authored by a small team of settler and Indigenous researchers, all of whom are deeply involved in scholarship and activism interrogating ongoing processes of coloniality in lands now known to many as Canada, this paper critically examines "social" and grounded determinants of Indigenous mental health and wellness. After placing ourselves on the grounds from which we write, we begin by providing an overview of the social determinants of health (SDOH), a conceptual framework with deep roots in colonial Canada. Though important in pushing against biomedical framings of Indigenous health and wellness, we argue that the SDOH framework nevertheless risks re-entrenching deeply colonial ways of thinking about and providing health services for Indigenous people: SDOH, we suggest, do not ultimately reckon with ecological, environmental, place-based, or geographic determinants of health in colonial states that continue to occupy stolen land. These theoretical interrogations of SDOH provide an entry point to, first, an overview of Indigenous ways of understanding mental wellness as tethered to ecology and physical geography, and second, a collection of narrative articulations from across British Columbia: these sets of knowledge offer clear and unequivocal evidence, in the form of Indigenous voices and perspectives, about the direct link between land, place, and mental wellness (or a lack thereof). We conclude with suggestions for future research, policy, and health practice actions that move beyond the current SDOH model of Indigenous health to account for and address the grounded, land-based, and ecologically self-determining nature of Indigenous mental health and wellness.

Socioeconomic deprivation and cardiometabolic risk factors in individuals with type 1 diabetes: T1D exchange clinic registry

AIMS

Social determinants of health (SDOH) influence cardiovascular health in the general population; however, the degree to which this occurs in individuals with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is not well understood. We evaluated associations among socioeconomic deprivation and cardiometabolic risk factors (hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein, blood pressure, body mass index, physical activity) in individuals with T1D from the T1D Clinic Exchange Registry.

METHODS

We evaluated the association between the social deprivation index (SDI) and cardiometabolic risk factors using multivariable and logistic regression among 18,754 participants ages 13 - 90 years (mean 29.2 ± 17) in the T1D Exchange clinic registry from 6,320 zip code tabulation areas (2007-2017).

RESULTS

SDI was associated with multiple cardiometabolic risk factors even after adjusting for covariates (age, biological sex, T1D duration, and race/ethnicity) in the multivariable linear regression models. Those in the highest socially deprived areas had 1.69 (unadjusted) and 1.78 (adjusted) times odds of a triple concomitant risk burden of poor glycemia, dyslipidemia, and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

Persistent SDOH differences could account for a substantial degree of poor achievement of cardiometabolic targets in individuals with T1D. Our results suggest the need for a broader framework to understand the association between T1D and adverse cardiometabolic outcomes.