Classifying Adenomyosis: Progress and Challenges

Adenomyosis and Abnormal Uterine Bleeding: Review of the Evidence

BACKGROUND

Thomas Cullen described bleeding abnormalities and dysmenorrhea as the "expected" presentations of adenomyomas. Adenomyosis is included within the FIGO classification of structural causes of abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB). Nevertheless, this long-standing association has been questioned by some authors who reported a high incidence of adenomyosis in uteri removed for indications other than AUB or dysmenorrhea. Here, we examine evidence for the link between adenomyosis and AUB.

METHODS

A comprehensive Medline literature review of all publications to October 2023.

RESULTS

Sixty-three articles were identified and included in the review. Despite a large body of studies, the available literature does not provide conclusive evidence of a link between adenomyosis and AUB. This is because of unsuitable study design, or poor characterization of the study population or of the inclusion or exclusion criteria. Additional challenges arise because of the lack of agreed criteria for diagnosing adenomyosis and the often absence of detailed assessment of menstrual blood loss. Adenomyosis often coexists with other conditions that have also been linked to similar symptoms, and many cases of adenomyosis are asymptomatic.

CONCLUSION

Most of the existing literature and studies that addressed treatment outcome of adenomyosis started from the premise that a link between the condition and AUB had been proven. Yet, published information shows that aspects such a relationship is still uncertain. Further research is needed to address the relation between AUB and adenomyosis burden (or subtypes), distribution, and concomitant pathology.

Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of the effect of adenomyosis on determining the depth of myometrial invasion in endometrial cancer

Background

Accurate preoperative diagnosis of endometrial cancer (EC) with deep myometrial invasion (DMI) is critical to deciding whether to perform lymphadenectomy. However, the presence of adenomyosis makes distinguishing DMI from superficial myometrial invasion (SMI) on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) challenging. We aimed to evaluate the accuracy of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in diagnosing DMI in EC coexisting with adenomyosis (EC-A) compared with EC without coexisting adenomyosis and to evaluate the effect of different adenomyosis subtypes on myometrial invasion (MI) depth in EC.

Methods

Patients with histologically confirmed International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage I EC who underwent preoperative MRI were consecutively included in this 2-center retrospective study. Institution 1 was searched from January 2017 to November 2022 and institution 2 was searched from June 2017 to March 2021. Patients were divided into 2 groups: group A, patients with EC-A; group B, EC patients without coexisting adenomyosis, matched 1:2 according to age ±5 years and tumor grade. A senior radiologist assessed the MRI adenomyosis classification in group A. Then, 2 radiologists (R1/R2) independently interpreted T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), T1-weighted contrast-enhanced (T1CE), and a combination of all images (mpMRI) respectively, and then assessed MI depth. Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and the areas under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were calculated. The chi-square test was used to compare the accuracy of diagnosing DMI. Interobserver agreement was evaluated using the Kappa test.

Results

A total of 70 cases in group A and 140 cases in group B were included. The accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of consensus were 94.3% [95% confidence interval (CI): 88.9-99.7%] vs. 92.1% (95% CI: 87.7-96.6%), 60.0% (95% CI: 17-92.7%) vs. 86.7% (95% CI: 68.4-95.6%), and 96.9% (95% CI: 88.4-95.5%) vs. 93.6% (95% CI: 86.8-97.2%) (group A vs. group B, respectively). There was no significant difference in the diagnostic accuracy of DMI on each sequence between the groups (Reviewer 1/Reviewer 2): PT2WI=0.14/0.17, PDWI=0.50/0.33, PT1CE=0.90/0.18, PmpMRI=0.50/0.37. The AUC for T2WI, DWI, T1CE, and mpMRI (Reviewer 1/Reviewer 2), respectively, were 0.54 (95% CI: 0.42-0.66)/0.78 (95% CI: 0.67-0.87), 0.63 (95% CI: 0.50-0.74)/0.77 (95% CI: 0.65-0.86), 0.69 (95% CI: 0.57-0.80)/0.79 (95% CI: 0.68-0.88), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.82-0.97)/0.89 (95% CI: 0.79-0.95) (group A) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89)/0.85 (95% CI: 0.78-0.90), 0.83 (95% CI: 0.76-0.89)/0.86 (95% CI: 0.79-0.91), 0.88 (95% CI: 0.82-0.93)/0.86 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92), and 0.91 (95% CI: 0.85-0.95)/0.87 (95% CI: 0.80-0.92) (group B). Interobserver agreement was highest with mpMRI [κ=0.387/0.695 (case/control)]. The consensus results of MRI categorization of adenomyosis revealed no significant difference in the accuracy of diagnosing DMI by adenomyosis subtype (Pspatial relationship>0.99, Paffected area=0.52, Paffected pattern=0.58, Paffected size>0.99).

Conclusions

The presence of adenomyosis or adenomyosis subtype had no significant effect on the interpretation of the depth of MI. T1CE can increase the contrast between adenomyosis and cancer foci; therefore, the information provided by T1CE should be valued.

[Classification of Uterine Adenomyosis: A Pictorial Essay]

MRI is a crucial tool for diagnosing adenomyosis and identifying its related pathologies. To accurately diagnose adenomyosis, it is necessary to recognize both the typical MRI findings and atypical features of the condition. Recently, a standardized classification system has been developed to facilitate precise presurgical diagnosis of adenomyosis and to determine the appropriate treatment method. Differentiating between various subtypes based on MRI-based classification and identifying different MRI phenotypes can aid in categorizing patients with adenomyosis into specific treatment groups and monitoring their response to therapy.

Cystic Adenomyoma in Pregnancy: A Case Report

Cystic adenomyomas (CA) are rare. They primarily affect adolescents and young women in their fertile years. Therefore, fertility and pregnancy outcome are of pivotal relevance in this patient collective. Apart from the guidelines of the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology (ESHRE) on the management of endometriosis in general, there are no specific treatment recommendations for CA and, as far as our research shows, no data illustrating the behavior of a CA over the course of pregnancy. Thus, we report the case of a 32-year-old 1-gravida, 1-para, preconceptionally diagnosed with a CA by ultrasound. After thoroughly discussing further treatment options, the decision was made to opt for a more conservative approach and not perform surgery before attempting a next pregnancy. The patient conceived spontaneously and sonographic monitoring of the CA throughout pregnancy showed complete regression of the cystic component during the second trimester. A healthy baby was delivered at term by an uncomplicated elective cesarean section. Following a review of the literature and taking into account the course of our case, we propose the feasibility of a conservative, non-surgical approach in women with a CA and the desire to conceive.

Innovative Ultrasound Criteria for the Diagnosis of Adenomyosis and Correlation with Symptoms: A Retrospective Re-Evaluation

The 2022 Delphi revision of the MUSA (Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment) criteria for the ultrasound diagnosis of adenomyosis divides the ultrasound signs for diagnosis into direct and indirect ones, considering the presence of at least one direct sign as a mandatory criterion. This study aimed to reclassify the patients referred to the Pelvic Pain specialist outpatient clinic of the Gynecological Clinic of Udine according to the new criteria, evaluating the number of overdiagnoses and the possible correlation between the direct and indirect signs and the patients' symptoms. 62 patients affected by adenomyosis were retrospectively recruited. The patients were then re-evaluated by ultrasound and clinically. At least one direct sign of adenomyosis was found in 52 patients, while 16% of the population examined did not present any. There was no statistically significant difference between patients presenting direct signs and those presenting none for the symptoms considered. According to the new criteria, 16% of the patients examined were not affected by adenomyosis; applying the new consensus to symptomatic patients could increase false negatives. In a population of symptomatic patients, the diagnosis of adenomyosis is still highly probable even without direct ultrasound signs, given the clinical symptoms and having ruled out other causes of such symptoms.

A method for isolating and culturing ectopic epithelial and stromal cells to study human adenomyosis

PURPOSE

Although adenomyosis is a common and benign gynecological disease, the specific pathogenesis of this condition is yet to be fully elucidated. It is difficult to culture primary cells of the ectopic endometrial epithelia and stroma from human adenomyosis lesions. Most of the previous of studies on adenomyosis were based on primary eutopic endometrium cells. However, as yet, no efficient protocols have been developed for the isolation, culture or purification of primary ectopic epithelial and stromal cells from human adenomyosis lesions. Therefore, the present study aimed to develop an efficient protocol for the isolation and culture of primary ectopic epithelial and stromal cells from human adenomyosis lesions.

METHODS

In the present study, we aimed to obtain ectopic endometrium tissue from human adenomyosis foci and use a simple and operable type I collagenase digestion method for primary culture. Cells were isolated by sterile cell strainer filtration and flow cytometry was performed to identify, purify, and evaluate the viability of isolated ectopic endometrial cells.

RESULTS

Using our method, we successfully isolated and cultured highly purified and active ectopic endometrial epithelial and stromal cells from human adenomyosis foci. Ep-CAM was expressed in ectopic epithelial cells of human adenomyosis with a purity of 93.74% and a viability of 80.58%. In addition, CD10 were robustly expressed by ectopic stromal cells in human adenomyosis. Cellular purity and viability were determined to be 96.37 and 93.49%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our method provides a new experimental model for studying the molecular pathogenesis of human adenomyosis.

Understanding Ultrasound Features that Predict Symptom Severity in Patients with Adenomyosis: a Systematic Review

Adenomyosis is associated with pelvic pain, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility. Several ultrasound-based classifications have been reported, but it is not clear which criteria reflect the severity of symptoms. The aim of this review is to summarize the ultrasound features that correlate with clinical manifestations of adenomyosis and to discuss diagnostic methods for predicting disease severity. A literature search of PubMed and Google Scholar published up to March 2022 was performed. A consensus-based classification was determined primarily by defining the mapping or topography of the lesion. Ultrasound features can be classified into direct (i.e., the presence of ectopic endometrial tissue within the myometrium) and indirect findings (i.e., changes in the myometrial structure and translesional vascularity secondary to myometrial invasion). There are some reports that symptoms are positively correlated with the location and spread of the disease. Indeed, the lesion thickness, diffuse or internal adenomyosis, and focal adenomyosis may be associated with increased risks of dysmenorrhea, abnormal uterine bleeding, and infertility, respectively. Two ultrasound markers (i.e., the presence of heterogeneous myometrium and myometrial cysts) appear to be the criteria most clinicians focus on. However, decision-making on treatment necessity is determined by symptom severity rather than the topography of the lesions. There is currently no consensus that symptom severity can be predicted based on ultrasound features, but the ultrasound-based criteria may be helpful in diagnosing adenomyosis.

Efficacy and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation for adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous microwave ablation (PMWA) for treating adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall.

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with symptomatic adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall who had been subjected to PMWA were retrospectively enrolled in this study. 20 patients who had no ideal transabdominal puncture path due to the retroverted or retroflexed uterine position were treated with PMWA combined with Yu's uteropexy (Group 1). The other 16 patients were treated with PMWA only (Group 2). The non-perfused volume (NPV) ratio, symptomatic relief rate, recurrence rate, changes in clinical symptom scores, economic cost, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The mean NPV ratio for the 36 patients was 90.2±18.3%, and the percentage of patients who obtained complete relief of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia was 81.3% (26/32), and 69.6% (16/23) respectively. The recurrence rate was 11.1% (4/36). No major complication was observed. Minor complications included lower abdominal pain, fever, vaginal discharge, nausea, and/or vomiting after ablation, with incidences of 55.6%, 41.7%, 47.2%, and 19.4% respectively. Subgroup analysis showed no significant difference in the median value of NPV ratio, symptomatic relief rate of dysmenorrhea and menorrhagia, changes in clinical symptom scores, recurrence rate and economic cost between the two groups (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSION

PMWA is an effective and safe treatment for adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study focused on the ultrasound-guided PMWA treatment for adenomyosis in the posterior uterine wall. Yu's uteropexy, a new ancillary technique allowing safe PMWA for deep posterior uterine wall lesions in retroverted uterus, expanded the indications of PMWA for symptomatic adenomyosis.

Effects of localization of uterine adenomyosis on clinical features and pregnancy outcome

The purpose of this study was to implore the association among clinical features, long-term fertility outcomes and the anatomical location of adenomyosis identified by ultrasound. We collected data of non-pregnant patients between 20 and 40 years old who had undergone surgical exploration for benign gynecological conditions at our institution between January 2010 and December 2017. A total of 158 women met the inclusion criteria and were allocated into three groups according to the ultrasound-determined adenomyosis anatomical location: anterior (Group A), posterior (Group B), both posterior and anterior (Group C). 44.3% (70/158) adenomyosis was located at the posterior side. History of miscarriage and parity were significantly higher in Group C (p = 0.036 and 0.001 respectively). Group C also had a higher concurrence rate of ovarian endometrioma (OEM) (80.4%, p = 0.002), pelvic adhesion (80.4%, P = 0.003) and the revised American Fertility Society (rAFS) Score (median64, range2-100, P < 0.001), while a significantly lower rate of concurrent peritoneal endometriosis (P = 0.01). Group B showed a relative higher rate of coexistent heavy menstrual bleeding (28.6%, p = 0.04) and oviduct obstruction (24.3%, P = 0.038). Group A had a higher proportion of coexistent leiomyoma (53.1%, P = 0.002). There were no significant differences between group A, B, and C in terms of pain symptoms, endometrial polyps, operation time, and endometriosis fertility index score and other basic characters (p > 0.05). During the follow-up, 59.2% (61/103) patients had clinical pregnancies, and 26.2% (16/61) of them experienced pregnancy loss. Total in vitro fertilization and embryo transfer pregnancy rate was 64.6% (42/65) and spontaneous pregnancy rate was 50.0% (19/38). The Kaplan-Meier curves demonstrated significant lower cumulative pregnancy rate in Group C than Group A and Group B (p = 0.01). Severe obstetric complications such as placenta previa, placenta accreta, preeclampsia, and preterm birth were only found in women with adenomyosis located in the posterior side. In conclusion, types of adenomyosis based on sonographic location had different clinical features and pregnancy outcome. Patients with adenomyosis lesion in both anterior and posterior sides had higher combination of OEM, pelvic adhesion and rAFS score.

Adenomyosis: An Updated Review on Diagnosis and Classification

Adenomyosis is a commonly diagnosed benign condition characterized by the presence of ectopic endometrial glands within the underlying myometrium. The most common presenting signs and symptoms are abnormal uterine bleeding, chronic pelvic pain, and infertility. The clinical relevance of this condition is evident in both medical and surgical care. Histopathology and imaging studies are used for the diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis, which are hallmarks of the advancement of our ability to diagnose adenomyosis. Importantly, the diagnosis and classification of adenomyosis lacks standardization due to the nature of imaging techniques, features of adenomyosis, and the clinical spectrum of adenomyosis. We reviewed the literature to summarize the available classification systems for adenomyosis and highlight the different imaging approaches and histologic criteria used in diagnosis. Despite the high prevalence of the disease, there is no clear consensus on one classification system. We provide a review of some of the classification systems available and discuss their strengths and limitations.

Modern view on the diagnostics and treatment of adenomyosis

Adenomyosis is identified by the enlargement of the uterus secondary to such areas of the endometrium as the endometrial glands and stroma located deep in the myometrium, which causes its hyperplasia and hypertrophy. The most common signs of the development of adenomyosis in a patient are copious menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea. However, it should be borne in mind that in some patients, the disease may be asymptomatic. Despite the wide abundance of imaging and other diagnostic methods for diagnosing adenomyosis, there are currently no standard verified diagnostic criteria for pathologists. In addition, women with adenomyosis often have other concomitant gynaecological diseases, such as endometriosis or leiomyomas, which makes it difficult to diagnose and choose the optimal treatment for patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to highlight up-to-date and relevant information for the practitioner about the epidemiology, clinical manifestations, diagnostics and treatment options for adenomyosis. Sources from four databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Elsevier and Google Scholar) were used to search for data. As a result of a literature review, it was established that the "gold" standard for the diagnostics of adenomyosis is histological research methods, in particular, biopsy performed during hysteroscopy or laparoscopy, whereas imaging methods (transvaginal sonography, magnetic resonance imaging) are more often used for differential diagnostics of adenomyosis with other diseases. In addition, magnetic resonance imaging allows for a better differential diagnostics between adenomyosis and myomatosis and helps to recognise the disease at an early stage. Regarding treatment, there is currently no particular therapy and algorithms for the treatment of adenomyosis, which is primarily due to the lack of precise criteria for the diagnostics of the disease. However, the most effective therapeutic methods at the present stage are the use of aromatase inhibitors and gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists, whilst minimally invasive techniques, in particular, endometrial ablation and uterine artery embolisation, are becoming increasingly popular amongst surgical techniques.

The Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis guidelines for managing adenomyosis

This is the first guidelines for adenomyosis from the Asian Society of Endometriosis and Adenomyosis.

In Search of an Imaging Classification of Adenomyosis: A Role for Elastography?

Adenomyosis is a complex and poorly understood gynecological disease. It used to be diagnosed exclusively by histology after hysterectomy; today its diagnosis is carried out increasingly by imaging techniques, including transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). However, the lack of a consensus on a classification system hampers relating imaging findings with disease severity or with the histopathological features of the disease, making it difficult to properly inform patients and clinicians regarding prognosis and appropriate management, as well as to compare different studies. Capitalizing on our grasp of key features of lesional natural history, here we propose adding elastographic findings into a new imaging classification of adenomyosis, incorporating affected area, pattern, the stiffest value of adenomyotic lesions as well as the neighboring tissues, and other pathologies. We argue that the tissue stiffness as measured by elastography, which has a wider dynamic detection range, quantitates a fundamental biologic property that directs cell function and fate in tissues, and correlates with the extent of lesional fibrosis, a proxy for lesional "age" known to correlate with vascularity and hormonal receptor activity. With this new addition, we believe that the resulting classification system could better inform patients and clinicians regarding prognosis and the most appropriate treatment modality, thus filling a void.

Transvaginal ultrasound versus magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosing adenomyosis: A systematic review and head-to-head meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Transvaginal ultrasound (TVS) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are used for the clinical diagnosis of adenomyosis.

OBJECTIVES

To compare the diagnostic accuracy of TVS and MRI for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A search of studies was performed in five databases comparing TVS and MRI for the diagnosis of adenomyosis from January 1990 to May 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies were eligible if they reported on the use of TVS and MRI in the same set of patients. The reference standard must be pathology (hysterectomy).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The quality of studies was assessed using the QUADAS-2 tool. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of both techniques were estimated and compared.

MAIN RESULTS

Six studies comprising 595 women were included. The risk of bias of patient selection was high in three studies. The risk of bias for index tests and reference test was low. Pooled estimated sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio for TVS were 75%, 81%, 3.9, and 0.31, respectively. These figures for MRI were 69%, 80%, 3.5, and 0.39, respectively. No statistically significant differences were found (p = 0.7509). Heterogeneity was high.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI and TVS have similar performances for the diagnosis of adenomyosis.

SFRP4+IGFBP5hi NKT cells induced neural-like cell differentiation to contribute to adenomyosis pain

Background

Adenomyosis is an estrogen-dependent gynecological disease. The pathogenesis of chronic pain, the main clinical symptom of adenomyosis, remains undefined. As a combination lymphocyte with both T-cell and natural killer (NK)-cell properties, NK T (NKT) cells play a role in immune defense against numerous diseases and modulate cell differentiation.

Method

This study analyzed the tissue-cell samples from adenomyosis with or without pain by single-cell sequencing.

Result

We found a specific population of secreted frizzled-related protein 4 (SFRP4)⁺NKT cells and a large amount of undifferentiated multipotent stem cells in the adenomyosis pain group. We discovered that a high expression of IGFBP5 in SFRP4⁺NKT cells could promote the differentiation of multipotent stem cells into neural-like cells via the single-cell trajectory. Through verification by the sample, we found that the degree of the expression of the neuronal marker NEFM was correlated with the duration of pain in adenomyosis patients. The expression of IGFBP5 was positively correlated with the pain scores of adenomyosis patients.

Conclusion

Collectively, these findings suggest that SFRP4⁺IGFBP5^hi NKT cells were capable of converting part of the stem cells into neurogenic cells and inducing adenomyosis pain.

Ultrasound-guided microwave ablation for symptomatic adenomyosis: More areas of concern for more uniform and promising outcomes

Adenomyosis is a common gynecological disease in reproductive women, which causes serious dysmenorrhea, menorrhagia, anemia, and infertility, and has a serious impact on the physical and mental health of women. Considering that the efficacy of the traditional medication and surgical treatment is not ideal, an increasing number of patients are searching for more effective and less invasive therapies. Ultrasound (US)-guided microwave ablation (MWA) has emerged as a new effective and minimally invasive alternative treatment for symptomatic adenomyosis, and it is widely being used in clinical settings. Several studies have proven that it is an efficient and safe treatment modality for symptomatic adenomyosis, but a significant variance in clinical outcomes reported in previous studies was also observed. Herein, we have analyzed the potential causes of this problem from the aspects of the diagnosis of adenomyosis, symptom evaluation before ablation, steps of US-guided ablation treatment, and outcome evaluation after ablation. Simultaneously, the clinical problems existing in the ablation treatment of adenomyosis are discussed, and the directions of future research are pointed out.