Validation of a Novel Predictive Algorithm for Kidney Failure in Patients Suffering from Chronic Kidney Disease: The Prognostic Reasoning System for Chronic Kidney Disease (PROGRES-CKD)

Development and validation of a machine learning model to predict time to renal replacement therapy in patients with chronic kidney disease

BACKGROUND

Predicting time to renal replacement therapy (RRT) is important in patients at high risk for end-stage kidney disease. We developed and validated machine learning models for predicting the time to RRT and compared its accuracy with conventional prediction methods that uses the rate of estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline.

METHODS

Data of adult chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients who underwent hemodialysis at Oita University Hospital from April 2016 to March 2021 were extracted from electronic medical records (N = 135). A new machine learning predictor was compared with the established prediction method that uses the eGFR decline rate and the accuracy of the prediction models was determined using the coefficient of determination (R2). The data were preprocessed and split into training and validation datasets. We created multiple machine learning models using the training data and evaluated their accuracy using validation data. Furthermore, we predicted the time to RRT using a conventional prediction method that uses the eGFR decline rate for patients who had measured eGFR three or more times in two years and evaluated its accuracy.

RESULTS

The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression model exhibited moderate accuracy with an R2 of 0.60. By contrast, the conventional prediction method was found to be extremely low with an R2 of -17.1.

CONCLUSIONS

The significance of this study is that it shows that machine learning can predict time to RRT moderately well with continuous values from data at a single time point. This approach outperforms the conventional prediction method that uses eGFR time series data and presents new avenues for CKD treatment.

From electronic health records to clinical management systems: how the digital transformation can support healthcare services

Healthcare systems worldwide are currently undergoing significant transformations in response to increasing costs, a shortage of healthcare professionals and the growing complexity of medical needs among the population. Value-based healthcare reimbursement systems are emerging as an attempt to incentivize patient-centricity and cost containment. From a technological perspective, the transition to digitalized services is intended to support these transformations. A Health Information System (HIS) is a technological solution designed to govern the data flow generated and consumed by healthcare professionals and administrative staff during the delivery of healthcare services. However, the exponential growth of digital capabilities and applied advanced analytics has expanded their traditional functionalities and brought the promise of automating administrative procedures and simple repetitive tasks, while enhancing the efficiency and outcomes of healthcare services by incorporating decision support tools for clinical management. The future of HIS is headed towards modular architectures that can facilitate implementation and adaptation to different environments and systems, as well as the integration of various tools, such as artificial intelligence (AI) models, in a seamless way. As an example, we present the experience and future developments of the European Clinical Database (EuCliD®). EuCliD is a multilingual HIS used by 20 000 nurses and physicians on a daily basis to manage 105 000 patients treated in 1100 clinics in 43 different countries. EuCliD encompasses patients' follow-up, automatic reporting and mobile applications while enabling efficient management of clinical processes. It is also designed to incorporate multiagent systems to automate repetitive tasks, AI modules and advanced dynamic dashboards.

Chronic kidney disease-associated pruritus (CKD-aP) is associated with worse quality of life and increased healthcare utilization among dialysis patients

PURPOSE

Chronic pruritus significantly impairs hemodialysis patients' health status and quality of life (QOL) and it is associated with higher mortality rate, more frequent hospitalizations, poorer dialysis and medication adherence, and deteriorated mental status. However, pruritus is still underestimated, underdiagnosed, and undertreated in the real-life clinical scenario. We investigated prevalence, clinical characteristics, clinical correlates, severity as well as physical and psychological burden of chronic pruritus among adult hemodialysis patients in a large international real-world cohort.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study of patients registered in 152 Fresenius Medical Care (FMC) NephroCare clinics located in Italy, France, Ireland, United Kingdom, and Spain. Demographic and medical data were retrieved from the EuCliD® (European Clinical) database, while information on pruritus and QoL were abstracted from KDQOL™-36 and 5-D Itch questionnaire scores.

RESULTS

A total of 6221 patients were included, of which 1238 were from France, 163 Ireland, 1469 Italy, 2633 Spain, and 718 UK. The prevalence of mild-to-severe pruritus was 47.9% (n = 2977 patients). Increased pruritus severity was associated with increased use of antidepressants, antihistamines, and gabapentin. Patients with severe pruritus more likely suffered from diabetes, more frequently missed dialysis sessions, and underwent more hospitalizations due to infections. Both mental and physical QOL scores were progressively lower as the severity of pruritus increased; this association was robust to adjustment for potential confounders.

CONCLUSION

This international real-world analysis confirms that chronic pruritus is a highly prevalent condition among dialysis patients and highlights its considerable burden on several dimensions of patients' life.

Bone metastasis risk and prognosis assessment models for kidney cancer based on machine learning

Background

Bone metastasis is a common adverse event in kidney cancer, often resulting in poor survival. However, tools for predicting KCBM and assessing survival after KCBM have not performed well.

Methods

The study uses machine learning to build models for assessing kidney cancer bone metastasis risk, prognosis, and performance evaluation. We selected 71,414 kidney cancer patients from SEER database between 2010 and 2016. Additionally, 963 patients with kidney cancer from an independent medical center were chosen to validate the performance. In the next step, eight different machine learning methods were applied to develop KCBM diagnosis and prognosis models while the risk factors were identified from univariate and multivariate logistic regression and the prognosis factors were analyzed through Kaplan-Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazards regression. The performance of the models was compared with current models, including the logistic regression model and the AJCC TNM staging model, applying receiver operating characteristics, decision curve analysis, and the calculation of accuracy and sensitivity in both internal and independent external cohorts.

Results

Our prognosis model achieved an AUC of 0.8269 (95%CI: 0.8083-0.8425) in the internal validation cohort and 0.9123 (95%CI: 0.8979-0.9261) in the external validation cohort. In addition, we tested the performance of the extreme gradient boosting model through decision curve analysis curve, Precision-Recall curve, and Brier score and two models exhibited excellent performance.

Conclusion

Our developed models can accurately predict the risk and prognosis of KCBM and contribute to helping improve decision-making.

A prediction model to assess the risk of egfr loss in patients with type 2 diabetes and preserved kidney function: The amd annals initiative

OBJECTIVE

To develop and validate a model for predicting 5-year eGFR-loss in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with preserved renal function at baseline.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A cohort of 504.532 T2DM outpatients participating to the Medical Associations of Diabetologists (AMD) Annals Initiative was splitted into the Learning and Validation cohorts, in which the predictive model was respectively developed and validated. A multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression model including all baseline characteristics was performed to identify predictors of eGFR-loss. A weight derived from regression coefficients was assigned to each variable and the overall sum of weights determined the 0 to 8-risk score.

RESULTS

A set of demographic, clinical and laboratory parameters entered the final model. The eGFR-loss score showed a good performance in the Validation cohort. Increasing score values progressively identified a higher risk of GFR loss: a score ≥ 8 was associated with a HR of 13.48 (12.96-14.01) in the Learning and a HR of 13.45 (12.93-13.99) in the Validation cohort. The 5 years-probability of developing the study outcome was 55.9% higher in subjects with a score ≥ 8.

CONCLUSIONS

In the large AMD Annals Initiative cohort, we developed and validated an eGFR-loss prediction model to identify T2DM patients at risk of developing clinically meaningful renal complications within a 5-years time frame.

The Cardiovascular Literature-Based Risk Algorithm (CALIBRA): Predicting Cardiovascular Events in Patients With Non-Dialysis Dependent Chronic Kidney Disease

Background and Objectives

Cardiovascular (CV) disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in patients suffering from chronic kidney disease (CKD). Although it is widely recognized that CV risk assessment represents an essential prerequisite for clinical management, existing prognostic models appear not to be entirely adequate for CKD patients. We derived a literature-based, naïve-bayes model predicting the yearly risk of CV hospitalizations among patients suffering from CKD, referred as the CArdiovascular, LIterature-Based, Risk Algorithm (CALIBRA).

Methods

CALIBRA incorporates 31 variables including traditional and CKD-specific risk factors. It was validated in two independent CKD populations: the FMC NephroCare cohort (European Clinical Database, EuCliD®) and the German Chronic Kidney Disease (GCKD) study prospective cohort. CALIBRA performance was evaluated by c-statistics and calibration charts. In addition, CALIBRA discrimination was compared with that of three validated tools currently used for CV prediction in CKD, namely the Framingham Heart Study (FHS) risk score, the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk score (ASCVD), and the Individual Data Analysis of Antihypertensive Intervention Trials (INDANA) calculator. Superiority was defined as a ΔAUC>0.05.

Results

CALIBRA showed good discrimination in both the EuCliD® medical registry (AUC 0.79, 95%CI 0.76-0.81) and the GCKD cohort (AUC 0.73, 95%CI 0.70-0.76). CALIBRA demonstrated improved accuracy compared to the benchmark models in EuCliD® (FHS: ΔAUC=-0.22, p<0.001; ASCVD: ΔAUC=-0.17, p<0.001; INDANA: ΔAUC=-0.14, p<0.001) and GCKD (FHS: ΔAUC=-0.16, p<0.001; ASCVD: ΔAUC=-0.12, p<0.001; INDANA: ΔAUC=-0.04, p<0.001) populations. Accuracy of the CALIBRA score was stable also for patients showing missing variables.

Conclusion

CALIBRA provides accurate and robust stratification of CKD patients according to CV risk and allows score calculations with improved accuracy compared to established CV risk scores also in real-world clinical cohorts with considerable missingness rates. Our results support the generalizability of CALIBRA across different CKD populations and clinical settings.

Data Science in Healthcare: COVID-19 and Beyond

Data science is an interdisciplinary field that applies numerous techniques, such as machine learning (ML), neural networks (NN) and artificial intelligence (AI), to create value, based on extracting knowledge and insights from available 'big' data [...].