Dual Use of Public and Private Health Care Services in Brazil

Adopting a pedagogy of connection for medical education

In this article, we propose developing a "pedagogy of connection" based on the history and evolution of medical education in Brazil. This pedagogy emerged from the intersection of the healthcare and higher educational systems, both dedicated to the principles of social justice and universal access, in response to the country's efforts to address the enduring impacts of slavery and social inequality. Following the "Sanitary Reformation" movement-a foundational moment for Brazil's healthcare and medical education systems-Brazil established the Unified Public Healthcare System (Sistema Único de Saúde - SUS). SUS is founded on principles of universality, integrality, equity, community participation, political and administrative decentralisation, hierarchisation and regionalisation. Aligned with these core principles and inspired by critical pedagogy, Brazilian medical education has evolved with a profound commitment to social justice, critical consciousness, professional presence and compassion. This evolution has given rise to a "pedagogy of connection," which imbues medical education with a sense of purpose and joy, preparing future medical professionals to address the challenges of our ever-evolving society and healthcare systems. The connections fostered by this pedagogy occur in complementary dimensions: (a) healthcare system and society, (b) community, (c) profession, (d) patients, and (e) ourselves. This innovative pedagogy enhances medical education discourse and practice by emphasising the development of a professional identity grounded in social justice and patient-centred care, which remain challenges for current medical education systems. As the global medical education community embraces decolonisation, this pedagogy offers a framework that can be adapted and enriched in various contexts worldwide, fostering opportunities for mutual learning from diverse educational systems in a dialogical and democratic manner.

Experience of living with psoriasis in Brazil: a Global Psoriasis Atlas online survey

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis significantly burdens patients' lives, but there is limited data on this in Brazil.

METHODS

Between May 2022 and January 2023, we conducted a cross-sectional online survey of 563 Brazilian residents aged ≥18 years who had been diagnosed with psoriasis. Spearman's correlation (r) was used to test the correlation between self-assessed disease severity (Simplified Psoriasis Index [saSPI] extent score; range 0 [clear/minor] to 40 [widespread/severe]) and health-related quality of life (QoL, score of 1 means perfect health) and capability (ICECAP-A: score of 1 means full capability) measures. Multivariable linear regression was used to identify predictors of QoL and capability. A thematic analysis examined the free-text responses and identified common themes.

RESULTS

The mean age of participants was 42.1 ± 12.4 years, and over half had at least one other long-term condition. The mean QoL score was 0.59 ± 0.25, and the mean capability score was 0.71 ± 0.21. At the time of survey completion, over 80% of respondents reported some level of pain and/or discomfort, and 86% reported feeling anxious and/or depressed. The mean self-assessed saSPI was 7.8 ± 8.6, which negatively correlated with health-related QoL (r = -0.49, P < 0.05) and capability (r = -0.44, P < 0.05). Significant predictors of poorer QoL and reduced capability included high saSPI, number of psoriasis flares and comorbidities, female gender, Black ethnicity, and employment status (unemployed, long-term sick). Frequently reported areas that impacted patients were social stigma/prejudice, powerlessness, lack of education and public awareness, and difficulty obtaining appropriate care/treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

We found that the clinical manifestations, severity, and associated comorbidities of psoriasis negatively impacted health-related QoL and capability, along with feelings of stigmatization and barriers to specialist treatment. This highlights the need for better access to care and awareness of the disease to improve the lives of people living with psoriasis in Brazil.

Real-world evidence of the burden of sickle cell disease: a 5-year longitudinal study at a Brazilian reference center

INTRODUCTION

Sickle cell disease (SCD) is an inherited and multisystem blood disorder characterized by hemolytic anemia, vaso-occlusive crises (VOCs), progressive multiorgan damage and increased mortality. In Brazil, it is one of the most common monogenic diseases afflicting 60,000 to 100,000 individuals, however, there are sparse epidemiological data, as well as information on the utilization of public healthcare resources.

METHOD

This was a 5-year (2016 - 2020) retrospective study conducted at one Brazilian reference center on SCD - Santa Casa de Sao Paulo, in Sao Paulo, Brazil.

RESULTS

Among a total of 100 eligible adult patients, the median age was 31.0 years old, 84% of the patients were aged between 18 and 45 years old; 59% were women and 91% presented the genotype HbSS. The number of hematologist and non-hematologist visits at the outpatient unit were 2,198 and 1,436, respectively. The number of hospital ER visits was 758, of which 51% required 864 days of hospitalization. The main cause for seeking hospital medical care was the VOCs. The numbers and ratios of VOCs were: 1 to 10 VOCs, 64%; 11 to 20, 15%, and; 21 or more, 1%. There was a statistically significant difference between the number of VOCs and hospitalizations, as well as infection.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate the burden of SCD on Brazilian patients' daily lives, the impact of VOCs on public healthcare resources, the importance of having a national surveillance program to improve resource utilization and clinical outcomes of patients with SCD and the urgent need for the revitalizing of the current national comprehensive SCD care programs.

Whoever wants better healthcare simply pays more: citizens' perception about voluntary private health insurance in Colombia

OBJECTIVES

To explore the perceptions that Colombians have about voluntary private health insurance plans (VPHI) in the health system to identify the tensions that exist between the public and private systems.

METHODS

A qualitative case study approach with 46 semi structured interviews of patients, healthcare workers, healthcare administrators, decision-makers, and citizens. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, anonymized, digitally stored, and analyzed following grounded theory guidelines.

RESULTS

We developed a paradigmatic matrix that explores how, in a context mediated by both the commodification of health and social stratification, perceptions about the failures in the public health system related to lack of timely care, extensive administrative procedures, and the search for privileged care led to positioning VPHI as a solution to these failures. The interviewees identified three consequences of using VPHI: first, the worsening of problems of timely access to care in the public system; second, higher costs for citizens translated into double payment for technologies and services to which they are entitled; third, the widening of inequity gaps in access to health services between people with similar needs but different payment capacities.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings can help decision makers to understand citizens´ perceptions about the implications that VPHI may have in worsening equity gaps in the Colombian health system. It also shows, how VPHI is perceived as a double payment for services covered within social security plans and suggests that the perceived lack of timely access to care in the public systems and the fear that citizens have for themselves or their family members when using suboptimal healthcare are important drivers to purchase these private insurances.

What will the ambitions of primary healthcare be in the 21st century?

This article attempts to analyze the problem of the modernity of primary healthcare, as well as the reforms to be implemented in a new context characterized by COVID-19. This article offers another vision to follow, to build a modern primary healthcare system. It is a descriptive and analytical study, which addresses the failure of the health system in general, as it proposes the reforms necessary to provide equitable, efficient and modern primary healthcare. The results clearly show that we can no longer act unilaterally; multi-sector efforts at the national level should be encouraged: we must act, in a preventive way, on the causes of the disease; international agreements on the environment, prices of basic foods and medicines, etc. are much needed to improve the health status of middle and low income countries, the case of the majority of African countries. So, different solutions can be conveyed by primary healthcare, in order to improve the whole health system.

Diabetic retinopathy screening and treatment through the Brazilian National Health Insurance

The current study aimed to investigate diabetic retinopathy (DR) screening and treatment coverages among diabetic patients evaluated through the Brazilian National Health Insurance from 2014 to 2019. The Brazilian Public Health System Information Database was used as the primary data source. DR screening coverage was calculated as the rate of procedures of clinical dilated fundus exam and color fundus photograph over the number of diabetic patients. DR treatment coverage was calculated as the rate of procedures of intravitreal injection, photocoagulation, and panretinal photocoagulation over the number of diabetic patients presumably in need of DR treatment. The overall screening coverage increased from 12.1% in 2014 to 21.2% in 2019 (p < 0.001) with substantial regional discrepancies so that North region was the only one with no changes along the period. The overall treatment coverage increased from 27.7% in 2014 to 44.1% in 2019, with Southeast and Midwest absorbing the demand for service from the North, Northeast and South. Despite an improvement along the past years, both screening and treatment coverages for DR in diabetes patients are ineffective in Brazil. Public health policies should address resources disparities throughout the country aiming to offer same healthcare conditions to patients regardless their geographic location.