Bowel Health in U.S. Shift Workers: Insights from a Cross-Sectional Study (NHANES)

Bowel health, defecation patterns and nutrient intake following adoption of a vegan diet: a randomized-controlled trial

BACKGROUND

The beneficial effects of a plant-based diet on gut microbiota diversity are well documented, however, its impact on clinical bowel health and defecation patterns are less well understood. Vegetarian diets have been associated with a higher bowel movement (BM) frequency as well as softer stools in cross-sectional studies. The effects of the de-novo adoption of a vegan diet on bowel health, however, have never been investigated in a randomized-controlled trial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present study examined bowel health and defecation patterns in relation to diet and nutrient intake in a young and healthy sample of n = 65 physically-active German university students who were randomly assigned to either a vegan or a meat-rich diet for eight weeks. Bowel health assessment included the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS), the Gastrointestinal Quality of Life Index (GIQLI) and the Cleveland Clinic Fecal Incontinence Score (CCFIS). Nutrient intake was assessed using weighed food diaries. The study was prospectively registered at the German Clinical Trial Register (DRKS00031541).

RESULTS

Weekly BM frequency slightly increased in vegans, whereas it remained unaltered in participants assigned to a meat-rich diet. Fiber intake increased significantly in vegans (34.89 (18.46) g/d) whereas it decreased in those assigned to the meat-rich group (22.79 (12.5) g/d). No significant intergroup differences in BSFS and CCFIS patterns were observed. Adoption of a vegan diet neither resulted in a transient increase in abdominal discomfort nor in a decreased gastrointestinal quality of life, which was comparable across the diet groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The short-term de-novo adoption of a vegan diet did not negatively affect markers of bowel health in this study.

Exploring the connection between caffeine intake and constipation: a cross-sectional study using national health and nutrition examination survey data

BACKGROUND

Caffeine has been reported to increase gastrointestinal motility and change intestinal microbiota. Constipation may be caused by colonic motor dysfunction and colonic microbiomeis disturbances. In this study, we aimed to explore the association between caffeine intake and constipation.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional study based on the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES). Caffeine intake was assessed using 24-h dietary recall method, and constipation was defined based on stool consistency or stool frequency. Logistic regression analysis was used to assess the association between caffeine intake and constipation, and results were expressed as odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Subgroup analysis was performed based on age.

RESULTS

A total of 13,816 participants were finally included for analysis. After adjusting potential confounders, high intake of caffeine was found to be associated with the low odds of constipation (Q3: OR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.49-0.74; Q4: OR = 0.77, 95%CI: 0.59-0.99; Q5: OR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.56-0.92). The similar association was found in young people and middle-age people (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

High caffeine intake was associated with the low odds of constipation. Our finding indicated that individuals should develop consciousness and habit of consuming caffeinated foods and drinks to prevent and relief the constipation.

Fecal incontinence was associated with depression of any severity: insights from a large cross-sectional study

OBJECTIVE

Current studies on the association between fecal incontinence (FI) and depression are very limited, and most of them are restricted to women or elderly patients. This study aims to evaluate in detail the association between FI and depression among US adults.

METHODS

13,480 adults aged 20 years and older were selected from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005-2010. Monthly loss of solid, liquid, or mucous stool was defined as FI. Clinical depression and depression severity were assessed by the validated Patient Health Questionnaide-9 (PHQ-9). Models of multivariate logistic regression were used to calculate adjusted odds ratios (ORs). A subgroup analysis was carried out to ensure that the results were stable.

RESULTS

After adjusting for covariates such as demographics, risk behaviors and associated comorbidities, the PHQ-9 score and clinical depression were both significantly associated with FI, with ORs and 95%CIs of 1.11 (1.10-1.13) and 3.01 (2.53-3.57). Depression of all severities was also significantly associated with FI. The ORs and 95%CIs of FI with mild depression, moderate depression, and moderately severe to severe depression were 2.29 (1.96-2.68), 3.44 (2.77-4.27) and 4.65 (3.61-6.00), respectively. Subgroup analyses showed no statistically significant interactions (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, FI significantly associated with depression of any severity. Like the elderly or female patients with FI, young and middle-aged or men with FI are also at high risk of depression and should also be the focus of depression screening and early intervention.

Influence of Shift Work on The Health of Nursing Professionals

Shift work is increasingly common in health services, subjecting healthcare professionals to work schedules that can alter circadian rhythms and eating habits with consequent repercussions for the intestinal homeostasis. The objective of this study was to describe the relationship of rotating work shifts with the intestinal health, sleep quality, and emotional dimension of nursing professionals. In March and May 2019, an observational and comparative study was conducted among 380 nursing professionals from different Spanish cities and divided into fixed shift (n = 159) and rotating shift (n = 221). To carry out the present work, the variables measured were gastrointestinal symptoms, stool consistency and shape, anxiety, depression, sleep, as well as stress and work environment. Nurses with rotating shifts reported more abdominal pain and symptoms of depersonalization, as well as worse sleep efficiency and worse nursing practice environment. In addition, overall scores of the Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale were found to be significantly worse in nurses with these shifts. Rotating shift work by nursing staff may be associated with the occurrence of gastrointestinal and anxiety-related symptoms. These findings, together with the presence of negative and insensitive attitudes towards patients by nurses on rotating shifts, should be considered to maintain the quality of healthcare.