Field Study of Postural Characteristics of Standing and Seated Smartphone Use

Neck and shoulder strains under various head flexing positions while standing and sitting with and without back support for male and female smartphone users

This study recruited 30 young participants (15 men and 15 women) to examine the smartphone usage patterns in three postures (standing, supported sitting, and unsupported sitting) and at five head angle (HA) positions (0°-40°). Cervical erector spinae (CES) and upper trapezius (UTZ) muscle activity, neck flexion (NF), gaze angle (GA), viewing distance (VD), and discomfort scores were collected. Results showed that HA and posture almost affected all responses, while CES muscle activity, NF, and VD differed between sexes. Strain in the neck and shoulder region increased with HA increase. Particularly, when the HA exceeded 20°, the discomfort scores considerably increased. Unsupported sitting should be avoided during smartphone use because of relatively poor responses in all variables. However, both standing and supported sitting have their respective benefits. Sex-related differences were typically observed in the standing position, with women tending to have lower NF but higher CES muscle activity compared with men.Practitioner summary: Although smartphones have become daily necessities, the overall quantitative neck and shoulder strain of using smartphones in different postures is rarely evaluated. We suggest that maintaining the HA within 20° is recommended because of relatively low load on the neck and shoulders. An unsupported sitting should be avoided during smartphone use.

Gender differences in neck muscle activity during near-maximum forward head flexion while using smartphones with varied postures

Women frequently express heightened neck discomfort even though they exhibit smaller neck flexion (NF) during smartphone use. Differences in natural posture while using smartphones may result in varying muscle activation patterns between genders. However, no study focused on this issue. This study investigated the influence of gender on neck muscle activity and NF when using smartphones, ranging from slight (20°) to nearly maximal forward head flexion, across different postures. We analyzed smartphone usage patterns in 16 men and 16 women and examined these behaviors across different scenarios: standing, supported sitting, and unsupported sitting, at 20°, 30°, 40°, and the maximum head angles. During data collection, muscle activity was measured, expressed as a percentage of the maximum voluntary contraction (%MVC), in the cervical erector spinae (CES) and upper trapezius (UTZ), along with NF. Results show significant influences of gender, head angle, and posture on all measures, with notable interactions among these variables. Women displayed higher muscle activities in CES and UTZ, yet exhibited lesser NF, while using smartphones in both standing (12.3%MVC, 10.7% MVC, and 69.0°, respectively) and unsupported sitting (10.8%MVC, 12.3%MVC, and 71.8°, respectively) compared to men (standing: 9.5%MVC, 8.8%MVC, and 76.1°; unsupported sitting: 9.7%MVC, 10.8%MVC, and 76.1°). This study provides a potential rationale for gender-related disparities in injury outcomes, emphasizing that women experience higher neck and shoulder discomfort level, despite their smaller NF during smartphone use, as found in previous research. Additionally, the cervical flexion-relaxation phenomenon may occur when the head angle exceeded 40°. The near-maximum head angle during smartphone use might induce the cervical flexion-relaxation phenomenon, potentially aggravating neck issues. We recommend limiting smartphone usage postures that exceed the near-maximum head angle, as they are commonly adopted by individuals in the daily smartphone activities.

Evaluating the Effect of a Myopia Control Spectacle Lens Among Children in Israel: 12-Month Results

PURPOSE

To investigate the effectiveness of a novel spectacle lens designed to slow the progression of myopia in children.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, double blind clinical trial.

METHODS

One hundred twenty-six Israeli children aged 6-13 years with spherical equivalent (SER) refractive errors of -0.5 to -6.25 diopters (D) were randomized into either the Shamir Myopia Control (SMC) lens design group or the conventional single-vision spectacle lenses (SVL), the control group. Outcomes measured were changes in axial length and cycloplegic refraction as well as subjective rating of visual experience over a period of 12 months.

RESULTS

At 12 months, AL and SER progression were slowed by 0.11 mm (35%, P < .05) and 0.16 D (25%, P = .122), respectively. In the subgroup of 6-10-year-olds, AL and SER progression were slowed by 0.17 mm (41%, P < .05) and 0.31 D (43%, P < .05), respectively. Similarly, for the subgroup of children with 2 myopic parents AL and SER progression were slowed by 0.15 mm (45% P < .05) and 0.36 D (42%, P < .05), respectively. Subjective visual experience reported in the 12-month questionnaire revealed no difference between the SMC and SVL groups, and average daily wearing hours were also not different between the groups: 14 (±1.4) and 13.8 (±2.3) hours, respectively. The study continues to its second year.

CONCLUSIONS

SMC lenses were effective in slowing the progression of SER and AL, especially for younger children and those having 2 myopic parents. The subjective rating of visual experience and the daily duration of use reported by the SMC group at 12 months were similar to the control group, indicating good lens tolerability.

Severity of slouched posture during smartphone use is associated with the musculoskeletal discomfort, daily usage, and school year among adolescents

Real-time measurement of the craniovertebral, thoracic kyphosis, and lumbar lordosis angles during natural and smartphone usage postures in sitting were analysed in a cohort of 560 adolescents using independent t-tests and Spearman's correlations between their reported musculoskeletal symptoms, daily device use and school year. Students with musculoskeletal symptoms (mean difference: 4.1-9.4°, p < .001) and in secondary schools (mean difference: 13.6-29.4°, p < .001) had a greater forward-head posture quantified by craniovertebral angle in both postures. Loss of lumbar lordosis was found in students spending ≥2 h/day on electronic devices (mean difference: 3.2°, p = .029) and those with musculoskeletal symptoms (mean difference: 5.4°, p = .001). Secondary school students exhibited a greater thoracic kyphosis when using smartphones (mean difference: 3.3°, p = .003). Findings suggest the urgent need for early and proactive intervention targeted to minimise the risk of developing musculoskeletal disorders related to intense device use for young adolescents.Practitioner Summary: Adolescents: (1) in higher school year had increased forward-head posture (FHP) and thoracic kyphosis; (2) with musculoskeletal symptoms had increased FHP and loss of lumbar lordosis, and; (3) with extended device use had a loss of lumbar lordosis. Early intervention targeting young adolescents promoting optimal posture and habit of device use is warranted.