1
|
Nakabembe E, Cooper J, Amaral K, Tusubira V, Hsia Y, Abu-Raya B, Sekikubo M, Nakimuli A, Sadarangani M, Le Doare K. The safety and immunogenicity of vaccines administered to pregnant women living with HIV: a systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine 2024; 69:102448. [PMID: 38333366 PMCID: PMC10850112 DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Revised: 01/04/2024] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 02/10/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)-exposed uninfected (HEU) infants have a higher burden of infectious diseases related morbidity and mortality compared with HIV-unexposed uninfected (HUU). Immunization of pregnant women living with HIV (PWLWH) could reduce the severity and burden of infectious diseases for HEU in early infancy. Methods We conducted a systematic review of safety and immunogenicity of vaccines administered to PWLWH and meta-analyses to test the overall effect of immunogenicity comparing pregnant women without HIV (PWWH) to PWLWH. We searched MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, Virtual Health Library and Cochrane databases in accordance with PRISMA guidelines for randomized controlled trials and observational studies. Review articles, case series, conference abstracts, and animal studies were excluded. Studies were included from inception to 6th September 2023, with no language restrictions. Random effects meta-analyses were performed for immunogenicity using Review manager (RevMan) analysis software version 5.4.1, Geometric Mean Titer (GMT) values were transformed to obtain the mean and standard deviation within RevMan, the effect size was computed and reported as mean difference with respective 95% confidence intervals. The review was registered with PROSPERO CRD42021289081. Findings We included 12 articles, comprising 3744 pregnant women, 1714 were PWLWH given either influenza, pneumococcal or an investigational Group B streptococcal (GBS) vaccine. Five studies described safety outcomes, and no increase in adverse events was reported in PWLWH compared to PWWH. The GMT increase from baseline to 28-35 weeks post vaccination in HA units ranged from 12.4 (95% CI: 9.84-14.9) to 238.8 (95% CI: 0.35-477.9). Meta-analyses of influenza vaccines showed the pooled geometric mean difference in Hemagglutination Inhibition (HAI) titers post vaccination was 56.01 (95% CI: 45.01-67.01), p < 0.001. The increase was less in PWLWH when compared with PWWH: -141.76 (95% CI: -194.96, -88.55), p < 0.001. Interpretation There are limited data on the safety and immunogenicity of vaccines given to PWLWH making policy consideration in this group difficult when new vaccines are introduced. With new vaccines on the horizon, PWLWH need to be included in studies to promote vaccine confidence for this special population. Funding This work was funded by Medical Research Council Joint Clinical Trials Round 9 [MR/T004983/1].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eve Nakabembe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
| | - Jo Cooper
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
| | - Kyle Amaral
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
| | - Valerie Tusubira
- Makerere University-Johns Hopkins Research Collaboration, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 23491, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Yingfen Hsia
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
| | - Bahaa Abu-Raya
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
| | - Musa Sekikubo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Annettee Nakimuli
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, School of Medicine, Makerere University College of Health Sciences, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 7072, Kampala, Uganda
| | - Manish Sadarangani
- Vaccine Evaluation Center, BC Children’s Hospital Research Institute, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4H4, Canada
- Department of Pediatrics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6H 3V4, Canada
| | - Kirsty Le Doare
- Centre for Neonatal and Pediatric Infection, St George’s University of London, Cranmer Terrace, London SW170RE, United Kingdom
- Makerere University-Johns Hopkins Research Collaboration, Upper Mulago Hill Road, P.O. Box 23491, Kampala, Uganda
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Ramasauskaite D, Grinciute D. Review of short-term and long-term adverse effects of covid-19 vaccination during pregnancy. Travel Med Infect Dis 2023; 56:102667. [PMID: 37951411 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2023.102667] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 11/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The covid-19 pandemic sparked a debate about the safety of vaccines during pregnancy. However, pregnant women were excluded from the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine phase 3 trials. As two years have passed since the first Covid-19 vaccine and more studies have been conducted, we want to evaluate the scientific literature to determine any actual risks in taking the vaccine during pregnancy. METHODS We conducted literature research using PubMed and Google Scholar databases from January to April 2023. As the review considers short- and long-term adverse effects it was divided into two parts. The first part was conducted as a systematic review. The second concerning long-term negative effects due to lack of research is a literature review. The inclusion criteria for the systematic review part were singleton pregnancies, women vaccinated during pregnancy, and studies from 2020 and later. The most common short-term pregnancy adverse effects were included in the search: preterm delivery, small gestation age, intrauterine death, congenital defects, stillborn, fetal growth retardation, spontaneous abortion. Maternal immune activation was the primary concern for the long-term adverse effects and whether vaccination could cause it. The search terms included maternal immune activation, fetal neurodevelopment, neuropsychiatric disorders and the studies used were from 2019. RESULTS Most studies showed no significant difference in short-term adverse effects between vaccinated and non-vaccinated women and their fetuses. However, the literature is insufficient to evaluate possible long-term adverse effects. CONCLUSION Available evidence supports the safety of administering SARS-CoV-2 vaccines to pregnant women, but further systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential. Maternal immune activation caused by vaccination may impact a child's neurodevelopment and should be a concern for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana Ramasauskaite
- Center of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Vilnius University Faculty of Medicine, PO: Santariškių 2, Vilnius, LT08661, Lithuania.
| | | |
Collapse
|