1
|
Antimisiaris D, Folz RJ, Huntington-Moskos L, Polivka BJ. Specific Medication Literacy in Older Adults with Asthma. J Nurse Pract 2024; 20:104979. [PMID: 38706630 PMCID: PMC11064973 DOI: 10.1016/j.nurpra.2024.104979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/07/2024]
Abstract
Purpose To explore specific medication literacy (SML) of older adults and associations of SML strength. Methods This was an observational study. Participants were at least 60 years old, with an asthma diagnosis and in good health. Data were collected by a registered nurse researcher. The SML data collection instrument gathered information about each medication a participant used: name, purpose, how taken, special instructions, adverse effects, and drug-drug or drug-disease interactions. An SML scoring rubric was developed. Results All could provide name, and most provided purpose, how taken. The lowest SML domains were side effects and interactions. Age at time of asthma diagnosis correlated with stronger SML scores and living in a disadvantaged neighborhood correlated with lower SML scores. Discussion Gaps in medication literacy may create less ability to self-monitor. Patients want medication literacy but struggle with appropriate, individualized, information. Conclusion The study provides insights on gaps and opportunities for SML.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Rodney J. Folz
- Jerald B. Katz Academy, Houston Methodist Research Institute, Houston TX
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dijkman EM, ter Brake WWM, Drossaert CHC, Doggen CJM. Assessment Tools for Measuring Health Literacy and Digital Health Literacy in a Hospital Setting: A Scoping Review. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 12:11. [PMID: 38200917 PMCID: PMC10778720 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12010011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 12/11/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
Assessment of (digital) health literacy in the hospital can raise staff awareness and facilitate tailored communication, leading to improved health outcomes. Assessment tools should ideally address multiple domains of health literacy, fit to the complex hospital context and have a short administration time, to enable routine assessment. This review aims to create an overview of tools for measuring (digital) health literacy in hospitals. A search in Scopus, PubMed, WoS and CINAHL, following PRISMA guidelines, generated 7252 hits; 251 studies were included in which 44 assessment tools were used. Most tools (57%) were self-reported and 27% reported an administration time of <5 min. Almost all tools addressed the domain 'understanding' (98%), followed by 'access' (52%), 'apply' (50%), 'appraise' (32%), 'numeracy' (18%), and 'digital' (18%). Only four tools were frequently used: the Newest Vital Sign (NVS), the Short Test of Functional Health Literacy for Adults ((S)TOFHLA), the Brief Health Literacy Screener (BHLS), and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). While the NVS and BHLS have a low administration time, they cover only two domains. HLQ covers the most domains: access, understanding, appraise, and apply. None of these four most frequently used tools measured digital skills. This review can guide health professionals in choosing an instrument that is feasible in their daily practice, and measures the required domains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline M. Dijkman
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands; (E.M.D.)
- Department of Surgery, Isala Hospital, 8025 AB Zwolle, The Netherlands
| | - Wouter W. M. ter Brake
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands; (E.M.D.)
| | | | - Carine J. M. Doggen
- Department of Health Technology and Services Research (HTSR), Technical Medical Centre, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands; (E.M.D.)
- Clinical Research Center, Rijnstate Hospital, 6815 AD Arnhem, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Klinger J, Berens EM, Schaeffer D. Health literacy and the role of social support in different age groups: results of a German cross-sectional survey. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:2259. [PMID: 37974154 PMCID: PMC10652531 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-17145-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/03/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Scholars demand more focus on context-related factors of health literacy as the management of health information is seen as a social practice. One prominent factor is social support that is expected to be particularly relevant for persons vulnerable for low health literacy. It was shown that health literacy can differ across the life span and especially older people have been demonstrated to be vulnerable for low health literacy. Therefore, health literacy and the relation of social support on health literacy in different age groups should be investigated. METHODS In a German nationwide survey 2,151 adults were interviewed face-to-face. General comprehensive health literacy was measured with the HLS19-Q47 which differentiates single steps of health information management - access, understand, appraise, and apply. Social support was measured with the Oslo 3 Social Support Scale. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were performed for all respondents and for five age groups. RESULTS Health literacy is relatively low in all age groups but particularly low among old-old people (76 + years). Also, the youngest adults (18-29 years) have slightly lower health literacy than middle-aged adults. On average, health literacy is higher among people with higher social support but this association varies between age groups. It tends to be quite strong among younger adults (18-45 years) and young-old persons (65-75 years) but is weak among older middle-aged (46-64 years) and old-old persons. The association also differs between steps of information management. It is stronger for accessing and applying information but there are differences in age groups as well. CONCLUSIONS Social support is a relevant aspect to improve individuals' health literacy and therefore should be addressed in interventions. However, it is necessary to differentiate between age groups. While both young adults and particularly old-old persons are challenged by health information management, young adults can strongly profit from social support whereas it can barely compensate the low health literacy of old-old persons. In addition, different challenges in information management steps in different age groups need to be considered when designing health literacy interventions. Thus, target group specific services and programs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Klinger
- Institute of Sociology and Social Psychology, University of Cologne, 50931, Cologne, Germany
| | - Eva-Maria Berens
- Ethics Committee, Bielefeld University, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Doris Schaeffer
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33501, Bielefeld, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Griese L, Finbråten HS, Francisco R, De Gani SM, Griebler R, Guttersrud Ø, Jaks R, Le C, Link T, Silva da Costa A, Telo de Arriaga M, Touzani R, Vrdelja M, Pelikan JM, Schaeffer D. HLS 19-NAV-Validation of a New Instrument Measuring Navigational Health Literacy in Eight European Countries. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:13863. [PMID: 36360755 PMCID: PMC9654211 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192113863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
To manoeuvre a complex and fragmented health care system, people need sufficient navigational health literacy (NAV-HL). The objective of this study was to validate the HLS19-NAV measurement scale applied in the European Health Literacy Population Survey 2019-2021 (HLS19). From December 2019 to January 2021, data on NAV-HL was collected in eight European countries. The HLS19-NAV was translated into seven languages and successfully applied in and validated for eight countries, where language and survey method differed. The psychometric properties of the scale were assessed using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and Rasch modelling. The tested CFA models sufficiently well described the observed correlation structures. In most countries, the NAV-HL data displayed acceptable fit to the unidimensional Rasch partial credit model (PCM). For some countries, some items showed poor data-model fit when tested against the PCM, and some items displayed differential item functioning for selected person factors. The HLS19-NAV demonstrated high internal consistency. To ensure content validity, the HLS19-NAV was developed based on a conceptual framework. As an estimate of discriminant validity, the Pearson correlations between the NAV-HL and general health literacy (GEN-HL) scales were computed. Concurrent predictive validity was estimated by testing whether the HLS19-NAV, like general HL measures, follows a social gradient and whether it forms a predictor of general health status as a health-related outcome of general HL. In some countries, adjustments at the item level may be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lennert Griese
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Hanne S. Finbråten
- Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2418 Elverum, Norway
| | - Rita Francisco
- Católica Research Centre for Psychological, Family and Social Well-Being, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Saskia M. De Gani
- Careum Foundation, Careum Center for Health Literacy, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
- Careum School of Health, Kalaidos University of Applied Sciences, 8006 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Robert Griebler
- Competence Centre for Health Promotion and Health System, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
| | - Øystein Guttersrud
- Department of Nursing and Health Promotion, Faculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, 0130 Oslo, Norway
| | - Rebecca Jaks
- Careum Foundation, Careum Center for Health Literacy, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christopher Le
- Department of Health and Nursing Sciences, Faculty of Social and Health Sciences, Inland Norway University of Applied Sciences, 2418 Elverum, Norway
- Department of Social Determinants of Health, Division of Prevention and Public Health, Norwegian Directorate of Health, 0213 Oslo, Norway
| | - Thomas Link
- Department of Quality Measurement and Patient Survey, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
| | - Andreia Silva da Costa
- Nursing Research, Innovation and Development Centre of Lisbon (CIDNUR), Nursing School of Lisbon (ESEL), 1049-005 Lisboa, Portugal
- Instituto de Saúde Ambiental (ISAMB), Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, 1649-026 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Miguel Telo de Arriaga
- Católica Research Centre for Psychological, Family and Social Well-Being, Universidade Católica Portuguesa, 1649-023 Lisboa, Portugal
- Direção-Geral da Saúde, 1049-005 Lisboa, Portugal
| | - Rajae Touzani
- Aix Marseille Univ, INSERM, IRD, ISSPAM, SESSTIM, Sciences Economiques & Sociales de la Santé & Traitement de l’Information Médicale, Equipe CANBIOS Labellisée Ligue 2019, 13009 Marseille, France
- Institut Paoli-Calmettes, SESSTIM U1252, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Mitja Vrdelja
- Communication Unit, National Institute of Public Health, 1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jürgen M. Pelikan
- WHO-CC Health Promotion in Hospitals and Health Care, Austrian National Public Health Institute, A-1010 Vienna, Austria
| | - Doris Schaeffer
- School of Public Health, Bielefeld University, 33615 Bielefeld, Germany
| |
Collapse
|