1
|
Arora HC, Bhushan B, Kumar A, Kumar P, Hadzima-Nyarko M, Radu D, Cazacu CE, Kapoor NR. Ensemble learning based compressive strength prediction of concrete structures through real-time non-destructive testing. Sci Rep 2024; 14:1824. [PMID: 38245574 PMCID: PMC10799911 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-024-52046-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024] Open
Abstract
This study conducts an extensive comparative analysis of computational intelligence approaches aimed at predicting the compressive strength (CS) of concrete, utilizing two non-destructive testing (NDT) methods: the rebound hammer (RH) and the ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV) test. In the ensemble learning approach, the six most popular algorithms (Adaboost, CatBoost, gradient boosting tree (GBT), random forest (RF), stacking, and extreme gradient boosting (XGB)) have been used to develop the prediction models of CS of concrete based on NDT. The ML models have been developed using a total of 721 samples, of which 111 were cast in the laboratory, 134 were obtained from in-situ testing, and the other samples were gathered from the literature. Among the three categories of analytical models-RH models, UPV models, and combined RH and UPV models; seven, ten, and thirteen models have been used respectively. AdaBoost, CatBoost, GBT, RF, Stacking, and XGB models have been used to improve the accuracy and dependability of the analytical models. The RH-M5, UPV-M6, and C-M6 (combined UPV and RH model) models were found with highest performance level amongst all the analytical models. The MAPE value of XGB was observed to be 84.37%, 83.24%, 77.33%, 59.46%, and 81.08% lower than AdaBoost, CatBoost, GBT, RF, and stacking, respectively. The performance of XGB model has been found best than other soft computing techniques and existing traditional predictive models.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harish Chandra Arora
- AcSIR-Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, 201002, India
- Structural Engineering Department, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, 247667, India
| | - Bharat Bhushan
- Structural Engineering Department, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, 247667, India
| | - Aman Kumar
- AcSIR-Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, 201002, India.
- Structural Engineering Department, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, 247667, India.
| | - Prashant Kumar
- AcSIR-Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, 201002, India
- Structural Engineering Department, CSIR-Central Building Research Institute, Roorkee, 247667, India
| | - Marijana Hadzima-Nyarko
- Faculty of Civil Engineering and Architecture Osijek, J. J. Strossmayer University of Osijek, Vladimira Preloga, Osijek, Croatia
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500152, Brașov, Romania
| | - Dorin Radu
- Faculty of Civil Engineering, Transilvania University of Brașov, 500152, Brașov, Romania
| | | | - Nishant Raj Kapoor
- AcSIR-Academy of Scientific and Innovative Research, Ghaziabad, 201002, India
| |
Collapse
|