Epidemiologic Study of Intensive Care Unit Admission in South Korea: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study from 2010 to 2019

Improving Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit by Assessment

PURPOSE

Patients in the intensive care unit suffer from pain caused by life-threatening illness or injury but also treatments such as surgery and nursing procedures such as venipuncture. Unconsciousness following head trauma or sedation stage complicates self-report, and both under- and over-management of pain can occur. Inadequate assessment and treatment might follow from unsuitable pain assessment practices. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the implementation of a pain assessment tool on nurses` documentation of pain and the administration of analgesia and sedation.

DESIGN

Quantitative pre-post design.

METHODS

The study was conducted at one intensive care unit at a university hospital and involved 60 patient records and 30 pre-implementations and 30 post-implementations of the Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT).

RESULTS

After implementation, a 38% adherence rate was found. The frequency of nurses' pain evaluations increased significantly from 1.3 to 2.3 per nursing shift. The implementation of CPOT also improved how often nurses identified pain by use of facial expressions, muscle tension, and cooperation with the mechanical ventilator, whereas focus on vital signs dropped (p = .014). A larger proportion of patients (17%) received paracetamol after the CPOT implementation compared with before (8%). Findings were statistically significant at p < .01.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of CPOT increased the frequency of pain evaluations, and the observable patient behavior was more often interpreted as pain-related. Nurses' adherence rate to sustained patient behavior focus being modest highlights the essential need for ongoing improvements in practice. Implementation of a new tool must be followed by non-pharmacological and pharmacological pain management steps.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

Implementing the CPOT as a pain assessment tool has the potential to enhance assessment practices. However, it is important to note that simply increasing assessment frequency does not guarantee nursing interventions to alleviate pain. This indicates the need for additional steps to be taken in order for nurses to complete the pain assessment cycle and effectively address interventions and reassessments.

Three-year mortality, readmission, and medical expenses in critical care survivors: A population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Due to the increasing number of critical care survivors, population-based studies on the long-term outcomes after discharge are necessary to inform local decision-making.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate mortality and its risk factors, readmissions, and medical expenses of intensive care unit survivors for 3 years after hospital discharge.

METHODS

This retrospective study analysed data from the National Health Insurance Service-National Sample Cohort in Korea. Of the 195,702 patients who survived and were discharged from hospital in 2012, 2693 intensive care unit patients were assigned to the case group for the study, and the remaining 193,009 were assigned to the comparison group. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality for 3 years after discharge. Secondary outcomes were all-cause hospital readmission and medical expenses in 3 years. We analysed risk factors for mortality using the Cox proportional hazard regression. The differences in hospital readmission and medical expenses between the case and comparison groups were analysed by multivariate logistic regression and independent t-tests.

RESULTS

The 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year cumulative mortality rates in the case group were 15.9%, 20.5%, and 24.4%, respectively, and older age, disability, medical admission, and longer hospital stay increased mortality. Almost 40% of intensive care unit survivors were readmitted to hospital within 6 months of discharge, and their odds of being readmitted were significantly higher than those of the comparison group. Medical expenses were also significantly higher in the case group, with the highest paid within 6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Mortality, hospital readmission, and medical expenses for intensive care unit survivors were the worst within 6 months of discharge. In light of the long-term recovery trajectory of critical illness, it is necessary to investigate what factors may have contributed to the negative outcome during this period. Further research is needed to determine which services primarily contributed to the increase in medical expenses.

Economic Burden of ICU-Hospitalized COVID-19 Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

The impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the global economy is far-reaching and difficult to assess accurately. We aimed to systematically determine the magnitude of the costs and the economic burden of intensive care for hospitalized COVID-19 patients since the onset of the pandemic by means of a systematic review. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant (protocol: PROSPERO CRD42022348741) systematic review by searching PubMed, EMBASE, and Web of Science for relevant literature. We included studies that presented costs based on a primary partial economic evaluation. Using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards checklist and the population, intervention, control, and outcome criteria, we established the risk of bias in studies at the individual level. Daily cost per ICU admission and total cost per ICU patient of the original studies extracted. A random effect model was adopted for meta-analysis whenever possible. Of the 1,635 unique records identified, 14 studies related to ICU-hospitalized costs due to COVID-19 were eligible for inclusion. Included studies represented 93,721 hospitalized COVID-19 patients. Regarding total direct medical costs, the lowest cost per patient at ICU was observed in Turkey ($2,984.78 ± 2,395.93), while the highest was in Portugal ($51,358.52 ± 30,150.38). The Republic of Korea reported the highest length of stay of 29.4 days (±17.80), and the lowest is observed in India for nine days (±5.98). Our findings emphasize COVID-19's significance on health-economic outcomes. Limited research exists on the economic burden of COVID-19 in the ICU. Further studies on cost estimates can enhance data clarity, enabling informed analysis of healthcare costs and aiding efficient patient care organization by care providers and policymakers.

Prior Lifestyle and Survival Outcomes After Intensive Care Unit Admission

BACKGROUND

Although lifestyle is an important and modifiable risk factor for health-related outcomes, no study has focused on the impact of prior lifestyle habits on mortality among critically ill patients after intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Therefore, we aimed to investigate whether prior lifestyle factors affected short- and long-term survival after ICU admission.

METHODS

In this population-based cohort study using a nationwide registration database in South Korea, we included all patients who were admitted to the ICU between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2018 and who had undergone standardized health examinations in the year prior to ICU admission. Three lifestyle factors (smoking status, alcohol consumption, and physical activity) were evaluated prior to ICU admission.

RESULTS

In total, 585,383 patients admitted to the ICU between 2010 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Of them, 59,075 (10.1%) and 113,476 (19.4%) patients died within 30 days and 1 year after ICU admission, respectively. Current smoking, mild alcohol consumption, and heavy alcohol consumption were not associated with 30-day mortality after ICU admission. One to 3 days per week of intensive physical activity, 4-5 days and 6-7 days per week of moderate physical activity, and 1-3 days, 4-5 days, and 6-7 days per week of mild physical activity were associated with lower odds of 30-day mortality after ICU admission. Similar results were observed for the analyses of 1-year all-cause mortality after ICU admission.

CONCLUSION

Prior lifestyle factors, such as physical activity, were associated with the improvement of both short- and long-term survival outcomes in South Korea. This association was more evident for mild physical activities, such as walking, than for intensive physical activities.