1
|
Moon HG, Bae S, Chae Y, Kim YJ, Kim HM, Song M, Bae MS, Lee CH, Ha T, Seo JS, Kim S. Assessment of potential ecological risk for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in urban soils with high level of atmospheric particulate matter concentration. ECOTOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SAFETY 2024; 272:116014. [PMID: 38295737 DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2024.116014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2023] [Revised: 11/06/2023] [Accepted: 01/21/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are known to be representative carcinogenic environmental pollutants with high toxicity. However, information on the potential ecological and environmental risks of PAH contamination in soil remains scarce. Thus, this study was evaluated the potential ecological risks of PAHs in soils of five Korean areas (Gunsan (GS), Gwangju, Yeongnam, Busan, and Gangwon) using organic carbon (OC)-normalized analysis, mean effect range-median quotient (M-ERM-Q), toxic equivalent quantity (TEQ) analysis, and risk quotient (RQ) derived by the species sensitivity distribution model. In this study, atmospheric particulate matter has a significant effect on soil pollution in GS through the presence of hopanes and the similar pattern of PAHs in soil and atmospheric PAHs. From analysis of source identification, combustion sources in soils of GS were important PAH sources. For PAHs in soils of GS, the OC-normalized analysis, M-ERM-Q, and TEQ analysis have 26.78 × 105 ng/g-OC, 0.218, and 49.72, respectively. Therefore, the potential ecological risk assessment results showed that GS had moderate-high ecological risk and moderate-high carcinogenic risk, whereas the other regions had low ecological risk and low-moderate carcinogenic risk. The risk level (M-ERM-Q) of PAH contamination in GS was similar to that in Changchun and Xiangxi Bay in China. The Port Harcourt City in Nigeria for PAH has the highest risk (M-ERM-Q = 4.02 and TEQ = 7923). Especially, compared to China (RQPhe =0.025 and 0.05), and Nigeria (0.059), phenanthrene showed the highest ecological risk in Korea (0.001-0.18). Korea should focus on controlling the release of PAHs originating from the PM in GS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hi Gyu Moon
- Ecological Risk Assessment Center, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju 52834, the Republic of Korea
| | - Seonhee Bae
- Ecological Risk Assessment Center, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju 52834, the Republic of Korea
| | - Yooeun Chae
- Ecological Risk Assessment Center, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju 52834, the Republic of Korea
| | - Yong-Jae Kim
- Medical Industry Venture Center, Korea Testing Laboratory, Wonju 26495, the Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung-Min Kim
- Ecological Risk Assessment Center, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju 52834, the Republic of Korea
| | - Mijung Song
- Department of Earth and Environmental Sciences, Jeonbuk National University, the Republic of Korea
| | - Min-Suk Bae
- Department of Environmental Engineering, Mokpo National University, Muan 58554, the Republic of Korea
| | - Chil-Hyoung Lee
- Green Energy & Nano Technology R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Gwangju 61012, the Republic of Korea
| | - Taewon Ha
- Green Energy & Nano Technology R&D Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Gwangju 61012, the Republic of Korea
| | - Jong-Su Seo
- Ecological Risk Assessment Center, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju 52834, the Republic of Korea.
| | - Sooyeon Kim
- Ecological Risk Assessment Center, Gyeongnam Branch Institute, Korea Institute of Toxicology (KIT), Jinju 52834, the Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Du Y, You S, Liu W, Basang TX, Zhang M. Spatiotemporal evolution characteristics and prediction analysis of urban air quality in China. Sci Rep 2023; 13:8907. [PMID: 37264078 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-36086-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2023] [Accepted: 05/29/2023] [Indexed: 06/03/2023] Open
Abstract
To describe the spatiotemporal variations characteristics and future trends of urban air quality in China, this study evaluates the spatiotemporal evolution features and linkages between the air quality index (AQI) and six primary pollution indicators, using air quality monitoring data from 2014 to 2022. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) and random forest (RF) models are created to forecast air quality. (1) The study's findings indicate that pollution levels and air quality index values in Chinese cities decline annually, following a "U"-shaped pattern with a monthly variation. The pollutant levels are high in winter and low in spring, and low in summer and rising in the fall (O3 shows the opposite). (2) The spatial distribution of air quality in Chinese cities is low in the southeast and high in the northwest, and low in the coastal areas and higher in the inland areas. The correlation coefficients between AQI and the pollutant concentrations are as follows: fine particulate matter (PM2.5), inhalable particulate matter (PM10), carbon monoxide (CO), nitrogen dioxide (NO2), sulfur dioxide (SO2), and ozone (O3) values are correlated at 0.89, 0.84, 0.54, 0.54, 0.32, and 0.056, respectively. (3) In terms of short-term AQI predictions, the RF model performs better than the SARIMA model. The long-term forecast indicates that the average AQI value in Chinese cities is expected to decrease by 0.32 points in 2032 compared to the 2022 level of 52.95. This study has some guiding significance for the analysis and prediction of urban air quality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuanfang Du
- Mathematical Department, Tibet University, Lhasa, Tibet, People's Republic of China.
- School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
| | - Shibing You
- School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| | - Weisheng Liu
- School of Economics, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang, Jiangxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Tsering-Xiao Basang
- Mathematical Department, Tibet University, Lhasa, Tibet, People's Republic of China.
| | - Miao Zhang
- School of Economics and Management, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, China
| |
Collapse
|