Challenges in Drug Surveillance: Strengthening the Analysis of New Psychoactive Substances by Harmonizing Drug Checking Services in Proficiency Testing

Evaluation of ATR-FTIR, HPLC-DAD, GC-MS, and GC-IR for the Analysis of 145 Street Drug Samples From Drug Checking Services

Drug checking services (DCS) are entities that allow recreational drug users to have street drug samples analyzed. Diverse analytical methods are applied for DCS, ranging from test strips to mass spectrometry (MS). This work evaluates the performance and utility of common methodologies used for DCS operating with off-site drug testing, while additionally assessing the potential of gas chromatography coupled to vapor phase infrared spectroscopy (GC-IR). Gas chromatography MS (GC-MS), GC-IR, and high-performance liquid chromatography with diode array detector (HPLC-DAD) were evaluated based on the analysis of 145 street drug samples obtained from two Swiss DCS. Additionally, attenuated total reflection Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR) was applied and is briefly discussed. A combined total of 245 analytes (including adulterants and cutting agents) were detected. GC-MS presented the greatest number of detected compounds, with a sensitivity of 96% compared with the sum of all analytes, followed by HPLC-DAD with 82%, while GC-IR showed limited sensitivity with 70%. GC-IR underperformed regarding the detection of low-abundant adulterants and of the main active ingredients in strongly adulterated samples. This study discusses the limitations and strengths of the evaluated methods in the specific context of DCS, while providing insights into the occurrence of false declarations (differing analytical results compared with alleged drug identity) and the distributions of adulterants and cutting agents in street drug samples. Based on our results, complementary approaches are considered the most valuable. Finally, the promotion of comprehensive guidelines regarding the quality and suitability of analytical methods for DCS would be highly desired.

The European Organisation of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) Statement: guidelines for publishing about interlaboratory comparison studies (PubILC)

Data and results from interlaboratory comparison (ILC) studies, external quality assessment (EQA) and proficiency testing (PT) activities are important and valuable contributions both to the further development of all disciplines of medical laboratory diagnostics, and to the evaluation and comparison of in vitro diagnostic assays. So far, however, there are no recommendations as to which essential items should be addressed in publications on interlaboratory comparisons. The European Organization of External Quality Assurance Providers in Laboratory Medicine (EQALM) recognized the need for such recommendations, and these were developed by a group of experts. The result of this endeavor is the EQALM Statement on items recommended to be addressed in publications on interlaboratory comparison activities (PubILC), in conjunction with a user-friendly checklist. Once adopted by authors and journals, the EQALM Statement will ensure essential information and/or study-related facts are included within publications on EQA/PT activities.

Implementation of a community-based LC-UV drug checking service: promising preliminary findings on feasibility and validity

BACKGROUND

The increasing diversity of psychoactive substances on the unregulated drug market poses significant health, psychological, and social risks to people who use drugs (PWUD). To address these risks, various harm reduction (HR) policies have been implemented, including drug checking services (DCS). Many analytical methods are used for DCS. While qualitative methods (e.g., thin layer chromatography, spectroscopy) are easier to implement, they are not as accurate as quantitative methods (e.g., LC-UV, LC-MS). Some HR programmes have implemented high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with UV detection (LC-UV). This article presents the cross-validation of this quantitative method with a reference liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry (LC-HRMS) method.

METHODS

Drug samples were provided by PWUD to a DCS called DrugLab in Marseille, France. The samples were weighed and prepared through dissolution in methanol, followed by ultrasonic bathing. Samples were analysed onsite using LC-UV analysis. They were then subsequently analysed with the reference LC-HRMS method. The LC-UV instrument in DrugLab was calibrated after being purchased; analysis of standard solutions was routinely performed once a month and after maintenance operations. For the LC-HRMS instrument, calibration and quality control procedures followed European Medicines Agency (EMA) guidelines. Statistical analyses were conducted including Spearman correlation tests using IBM® SPSS® Statistics version 20.

RESULTS

A total of 102 samples representing different product classes and cutting agents were cross-validated. Differences between both analyses methods for each molecule analysed were ≤ 20%, with significant correlations between both methods' results for most substances. Notably, LC-HRMS provided lower concentration values for cocaine and acetaminophen, whereas it provided higher values for other substances. Correlations were significant for cocaine, ketamine, MDMA, heroin, amphetamine, caffeine, acetaminophen, and levamisole.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the results provided by DrugLab were accurate and reliable, making LC-UV an adaptable, stable, and suitable analytical method for simple matrices like drugs in a DCS context. However, this cross validation does not guarantee accuracy over time. A proficiency test project in HR laboratories across France is currently under development in order to address potential drifts in LC-UV accuracy.

Technical and health governance aspects of the external quality assessment system for classical and new psychoactive substances analysis testing in blood

New psychoactive substances (NPS) are uncontrolled analogues of existing drugs or newly synthesized chemicals that exhibit psychopharmacological effects. Due to their diverse nature, composition, and increasing prevalence, they present significant challenges to the healthcare system and drug control policies. In response, healthcare system laboratories have developed analytical methods to detect NPS in biological samples. As a Regional Reference Centre, the Sicilian CRQ Laboratory (Regional Laboratory for Quality Control) developed and conducted an External Quality Assessment (EQA) study to assess, in collaboration with the Istituto Superiore di Sanità (ISS), the ability of different Italian laboratories to identify NPS and traditional drugs of abuse (DOA) in biological matrices. Two blood samples were spiked with substances from various drug classes, including synthetic cannabinoids, cathinones, synthetic opiates, and benzodiazepines, at concentrations ranging from 2 to 10 ng/mL. The blood samples were freeze-dried to ensure the stability of DOA and NPS. Twenty-two laboratories from the Italian healthcare system participated in this assessment. The information provided by the laboratories during the registration in an in-house platform included a general description of the laboratory, analytical technique, and the chosen panels of analytes. The same platform was employed to collect and statistically analyze the data and record laboratory feedback and comments. The evaluation of the results revealed that the participating laboratories employed three different techniques for analyzing the samples: GC-MS, LC-MS, and immunoenzymatic methods. Approximately 90 % of the laboratories utilized LC-MS techniques. Around 40 % of false negative results were obtained, with the worst results in the identification of 5-chloro AB PINACA. The results showed that laboratories that used LC-MS methods obtained better specificity and sensitivity compared to the laboratories using other techniques. The results obtained from this first assessment underscore the importance of external quality control schemes in identifying the most effective analytical techniques for detecting trace molecules in biological matrices. Since the judicial authorities have not yet established cut-off values for NPS, this EQA will enable participating laboratories to share their analytical methods and expertise, aiming to establish common criteria for NPS identification.

Detecting novel psychoactive substances around the world

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The worldwide spread of novel psychoactive substances (NPS) in the illicit drug market and their continuous increase in number and type, for the purpose of bypassing controlled substance legislation, represents a continuing challenge for forensic scientists, clinicians and enforcement authorities. We aim to provide information regarding the most urgent harms related to NPS consumption in different world regions and the current state of the art for NPS analysis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Unfortunately, the identification of NPS in biological samples is controversial, especially when samples are limited, or the drug is promptly and extensively metabolized. This causes a lack of information on their real diffusion in different parts of the world and in different populations. New technologies and instrumental detection of NPS in alternative samples are offering comprehensive information about NPS use.

SUMMARY

The lack of detection and underreporting of NPS in biological samples makes it difficult to obtain complete qualitative and quantitative information about NPS prevalence. The most innovative strategies that have been proposed in the last 2 years to assist NPS analysis and possibly facilitate the understanding of the NPS diffusion around the world are presented.

NPS-EQA PART II: Four years' experience in external quality assessment program in Italy for classical and new psychoactive substances analysis in hair

In 2019, the Italian National Institute of Health established an external quality assessment (EQA) program to evaluate the performance of laboratories of collaborative centres participating in the National Early Warning System in hair testing for classical and new psychoactive substances (NPS). The results obtained in the four rounds (2019-2023) and the evolution in hair testing performance for classic drugs of abuse and new psychoactive substances are presented. A total of 11 hair specimens, including 3 blank samples, were prepared by adding different classes of classical and NPS at known concentrations to pre-screened drug-free hair. False negative and false positive results were calculated for the qualitative data evaluation. The quantitative evaluation included the imprecision (as % coefficient of variation, CV%) and the accuracy (as % error, ERR%) of the results with respect to a mean value obtained by reference laboratories and Z-score values were assessed. Over the years, an improvement in false negative results (from 52.4% in the first year to 34.3% in the last one) and false positive results (from 55.0% in the first year to 30.8.% in the last one) was observed. In the first round, the mean ERR% ranged from 6.2% to 112.8% due to NPS determination. However, in the subsequent three rounds, the mean ERR% ranged from 10.4% to 22.4%, The mean CV% in the four rounds was approximately 41.5% (ranging from 44.3% to 53.3%). Between 12.0% and 56.6% of the reported results in all rounds should be considered satisfactory. EQA programs help laboratories to identify and correct problems within their processes by highlighting errors and variations. This ensures that the results produced are accurate and reproducible.

In Support of Community Drug Checking Programs: Position Statement of AMERSA, Inc. (Association for Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Substance use and Addiction)

BACKGROUND

Position statements clarify key issues that are in alignment with the vision, mission, and values of the AMERSA, Inc. (Association for Multidisciplinary Education and Research in Substance use and Addiction). This Position Statement, endorsed by the AMERSA Board of Directors on October 3, 2023, amplifies the position of the organization, guides their activities, and informs the public and policymakers on the organization's stance on this issue.

ISSUE

The unregulated drug supply in the United States evolves constantly, leaving those who use drugs potentially unaware of new adulterants in their drugs. Not knowing that information can leave people vulnerable to serious adverse events such as fatal overdoses, wounds, and other health consequences. Without real-time data on the composition of drugs available in a community, healthcare providers and public health practitioners are left with insufficient data, making it increasingly difficult to know how to best serve people who use drugs. In this context, community-based drug checking has become recognized as an important harm reduction strategy with the potential to provide those who use drugs with more information about their supply.

RECOMMENDATIONS

It is imperative to expand funding and increase access to drug checking programs in communities across the United States. Key policy changes, such as those related to decriminalizing drug and drug paraphernalia possession, are needed to increase the utilization of drug checking programs. Protection of persons who use drugs through harm reduction strategies, including drug checking programs needs to be widely available and accessible.

"It would really support the wider harm reduction agenda across the board": A qualitative study of the potential impacts of drug checking service delivery in Scotland

Drug checking services (DCS) enable individuals to voluntarily submit a small amount of a substance for analysis, providing information about the content of the substance along with tailored harm reduction support and advice. There is some evidence suggesting that DCS may lead to behaviour and system change, with impacts for people who use drugs, staff and services, and public health structures. The evidence base is still relatively nascent, however, and several evidence gaps persist. This paper reports on qualitative interviews with forty-three participants across three Scottish cities where the implementation of community-based DCS is being planned. Participants were drawn from three groups: professional participants; people with experience of drug use; and affected family members. Findings focus on perceived harm reduction impacts of DCS delivery in Scotland, with participants highlighting the potential for drug checking to impact a number of key groups including: individual service users; harm reduction services and staff; drug market monitoring structures and networks; and wider groups of people who use and sell drugs, in shaping their interactions with the drug market. Whilst continued evaluation of individual health behaviour outcomes is crucial to building the evidence base for DCS, the findings highlight the importance of extending evaluation beyond these outcomes. This would include evaluation of processes such as: information sharing across a range of parties; engagement with harm reduction and treatment services; knowledge building; and increased drug literacy. These broader dynamics may be particularly important for evaluations of community-based DCS serving individuals at higher-risk, given the complex relationship between information provision and health behaviour change which may be mediated by mental and physical health, stigma, criminalisation and the risk environment. This paper is of international relevance and adds to existing literature on the potential impact of DCS on individuals, organisations, and public health structures.