Polyvictimization and Adolescent Health and Well-Being in Ethiopia: The Mediating Role of Resilience

Child maltreatment and behavioral health outcomes in child welfare: Exploring the roles of severity and polyvictimization

BACKGROUND

Child maltreatment and polyvictimization are known risk factors for long-term detrimental health and development outcomes, including behavioral health challenges. However, effects from specific types and combinations of maltreatments are unclear. This study examined the association between maltreatment or polyvictimization and behavioral health in a child welfare sample.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Medical records of children with child welfare involvement with at least one behavioral health condition (i.e., mental, behavioral or neurodevelopmental disorder, ICD-10 F01-F99) between 1/1/2018-12/31/2021 were extracted from a large, academic hospital system.

METHODS

Behavioral health complexity was categorized as non-chronic, non-complex chronic, or complex chronic using the Pediatric Medical Complexity Algorithm. Partial proportional logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, race/ethnicity, caregiver type, and physical health complexity generated odds of behavioral health complexity by maltreatment type (physical abuse, sexual abuse, neglect) and maltreatment combinations.

RESULTS

The analytic sample included 3992 participants (mean age 7.6 (Standard Deviation, 5.0) 44 % female, 29 % white, 32 % black, 22 % Hispanic). Participants who experienced physical abuse (Odds Ratio [OR]: 1.79, 95 % Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.10-2.91), or neglect (OR: 1.69, 95 % CI: 1.38-2.07) were more likely to have increasing behavioral health complexity versus those without maltreatment. Participants with both physical abuse and neglect were over twice as likely (OR: 2.44, 95 % CI: 1.88-3.16) to have increasing behavioral health complexity versus those who did not experience maltreatment.

CONCLUSION

Results emphasize the differential impacts of maltreatment and polyvictimization exposures on behavioral health complexity among children with child welfare involvement that can guide risk assessment and clinical care.

Measuring Healing and Recovery After Gender-Based Violence: A Scoping Review

Healing after gender-based violence (GBV) is multidimensional, with varying instruments used in the scientific literature to capture this phenomenon quantitively in survivor populations. The purpose of this scoping review was to (a) describe quantitative measures used to evaluate recovery after GBV, (b) compare these findings with domains uncovered in a qualitative metasynthesis about survivors' perspectives about healing after GBV, and (c) summarize recovery relationships found. We searched Pubmed, PsycInfo, and Violence/Criminology/Family Studies Abstracts. Studies were included for review if they (a) used quantitative methods, (b) evaluated healing or recovery in survivors of GBV, (c) were available in English, and (d) were empirical articles in peer-reviewed journals. Two thousand nine hundred thirty-five articles were reviewed by title and abstract, and 92 articles were reviewed by full text. Twenty-six articles were included in this review. Eight studies used an alleviation of adverse symptomology as a proxy for recovery, eight used growth-related outcomes, and ten used a combination of both types of measures. While the quantitative instruments synthesized in this review seemed to map onto some of the recovery domains identified through qualitative metasynthesis, no study synthesized measured all domains simultaneously. Studies synthesized identified that recovery-related outcomes may be influenced by social support, symptom burden, disclosure, and various therapeutic intervention programs tested in the literature to date. Synthesizing research on recovery after GBV is an essential step to understand gaps in measurement and understanding. Streamlining and using holistic recovery outcome measurement can aid in the development of evidence-based interventions to promote healing in survivor populations.