1
|
Kelter R. Reducing the false discovery rate of preclinical animal research with Bayesian statistical decision criteria. Stat Methods Med Res 2023; 32:1880-1901. [PMID: 37519294 PMCID: PMC10563376 DOI: 10.1177/09622802231184636] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/01/2023]
Abstract
The success of preclinical research hinges on exploratory and confirmatory animal studies. Traditional null hypothesis significance testing is a common approach to eliminate the chaff from a collection of drugs, so that only the most promising treatments are funneled through to clinical research phases. Balancing the number of false discoveries and false omissions is an important aspect to consider during this process. In this paper, we compare several preclinical research pipelines, either based on null hypothesis significance testing or based on Bayesian statistical decision criteria. We build on a recently published large-scale meta-analysis of reported effect sizes in preclinical animal research and elicit a non-informative prior distribution under which both approaches are compared. After correcting for publication bias and shrinkage of effect sizes in replication studies, simulations show that (i) a shift towards statistical approaches which explicitly incorporate the minimum clinically important difference reduces the false discovery rate of frequentist approaches and (ii) a shift towards Bayesian statistical decision criteria can improve the reliability of preclinical animal research by reducing the number of false-positive findings. It is shown that these benefits hold while keeping the number of experimental units low which are required for a confirmatory follow-up study. Results show that Bayesian statistical decision criteria can help in improving the reliability of preclinical animal research and should be considered more frequently in practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riko Kelter
- Department of Mathematics, University of Siegen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brosseau G, Pagé N, de Jaham C, del Castillo JRE. Medical honey for canine nasal intertrigo: A randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, adaptive clinical trial to support antimicrobial stewardship in veterinary dermatology. PLoS One 2020; 15:e0235689. [PMID: 32760092 PMCID: PMC7410251 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0235689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Intertrigo is a skin fold dermatitis often requiring recurrent treatment with topical antiseptics or antibiotics, which can select antimicrobial resistance. To minimize this risk, we tested the effectiveness of medical-grade Manuka honey at treating intertrigo as compared to a placebo hydrogel. We additionally characterized the culturable microbial flora of intertrigo and recorded any adverse effect with either treatment. During this randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, adaptive group-sequential trial, the owners washed the affected sites on their dog with water, dried and applied a thin film of either the honey or the placebo product once daily for 21 days. Cytological and lesional composite scores, owner-assessed pruritus, and microbial cultures were assessed prior to treatment and on Day-22. The fixed effects of time, treatment, and animal-related variables on the pruritus and on each composite score, accounting for random dog effect, were estimated separately with generalized linear mixed models for repeated count outcomes (α = 0.05). The null hypothesis of equal treatment effects was rejected at the first interim analysis. The placebo (n = 16 dogs) outperformed the medical honey (n = 13 dogs) at improving both the cytological score (Treatment×Time = -0.35±0.17; P = 0.04) and clinical score (Treatment×Time = -0.28±0.13; P = 0.04). A microbial burden score higher than 4 increased the severity of the cytological score (dichotomous score: 0.29±0.11; P = 0.01), which in turn increased the severity of the clinical score and pruritus score. For every unit increase in cytological score, the linear predictor of clinical score increased by 0.042±0.019 (P = 0.03), and the one of pruritus score increased by 0.12±0.05 (P = 0.01). However, medical honey outperformed the placebo at alleviating the dog's owner-assessed pruritus after statistically controlling for masking effects (Time = -0.94±0.24; P = 0.002; and Treatment×Time = 0.80±0.36; P = 0.04). Unilateral tests of the least-square mean estimates revealed that honey only significantly improved the pruritus (Hommel-adjusted P = 0.003), while the placebo only improved the cytological and clinical scores (Hommel-adjusted P = 0.01 and 0.002, respectively). Taken together, these results question the value of Manuka honey at treating nasal intertrigo in dogs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gabrielle Brosseau
- Department of Dermatology, Centre Vétérinaire DMV, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nadia Pagé
- Department of Dermatology, Centre Vétérinaire DMV, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Caroline de Jaham
- Department of Dermatology, Centre Vétérinaire DMV, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Jérôme R. E. del Castillo
- Quebec’s Animal Pharmacology Research Group (GREPAQ), Department of Veterinary Biomedicine, University of Montreal, Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Watford S, Ly Pham L, Wignall J, Shin R, Martin MT, Friedman KP. ToxRefDB version 2.0: Improved utility for predictive and retrospective toxicology analyses. Reprod Toxicol 2019; 89:145-158. [PMID: 31340180 PMCID: PMC6944327 DOI: 10.1016/j.reprotox.2019.07.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 53] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2019] [Revised: 05/31/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The Toxicity Reference Database (ToxRefDB) structures information from over 5000 in vivo toxicity studies, conducted largely to guidelines or specifications from the US Environmental Protection Agency and the National Toxicology Program, into a public resource for training and validation of predictive models. Herein, ToxRefDB version 2.0 (ToxRefDBv2) development is described. Endpoints were annotated (e.g. required, not required) according to guidelines for subacute, subchronic, chronic, developmental, and multigenerational reproductive designs, distinguishing negative responses from untested. Quantitative data were extracted, and dose-response modeling for nearly 28,000 datasets from nearly 400 endpoints using Benchmark Dose (BMD) Modeling Software were generated and stored. Implementation of controlled vocabulary improved data quality; standardization to guideline requirements and cross-referencing with United Medical Language System (UMLS) connects ToxRefDBv2 observations to vocabularies linked to UMLS, including PubMed medical subject headings. ToxRefDBv2 allows for increased connections to other resources and has greatly enhanced quantitative and qualitative utility for predictive toxicology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean Watford
- ORAU, Contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Student Services Contract, United States; National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, United States
| | - Ly Ly Pham
- ORAU, Contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Student Services Contract, United States; ORISE Postdoctoral Research Participant, United States
| | | | | | - Matthew T Martin
- ORAU, Contractor to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency through the National Student Services Contract, United States; Currently at Drug Safety Research and Development, Global Investigative Toxicology, Pfizer, Groton, CT, United States
| | - Katie Paul Friedman
- National Center for Computational Toxicology, Office of Research and Development, US Environmental Protection Agency, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cai C, Piao J, Ning J, Huang X. Efficient two-stage designs and proper inference for animal studies. STATISTICS IN BIOSCIENCES 2018; 10:217-232. [PMID: 30294384 PMCID: PMC6168085 DOI: 10.1007/s12561-017-9212-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2016] [Accepted: 12/06/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
Cost-effective yet efficient designs are critical to the success of animal studies. We propose a two-stage design for cost-effectiveness animal studies with continuous outcomes. Given the data from the two-stage design, we derive the exact distribution of the test statistic under null hypothesis to appropriately adjust for the design's adaptiveness. We further generalize the design and inferential procedure to the K-sample case with multiple comparison adjustment. We conduct simulation studies to evaluate the small sample behavior of the proposed design and test procedure. The results indicate that the proposed test procedure controls the type I error rate for the one-sample design and the family-wise error rate for K-sample design very well; whereas the naive approach that ignores the design's adaptiveness due to the interim look severely inflates the type I error rate or family-wise error rate. Compared with the standard one-stage design, the proposed design generally requires a smaller sample size.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunyan Cai
- Biostatistics/Epidemiology/Research Design Core, Center for Clinical and Translational Sciences, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| | - Jin Piao
- Division of Biostatistics, The University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| | - Jing Ning
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| | - Xuelin Huang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, U.S.A
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Neumann K, Grittner U, Piper SK, Rex A, Florez-Vargas O, Karystianis G, Schneider A, Wellwood I, Siegerink B, Ioannidis JPA, Kimmelman J, Dirnagl U. Increasing efficiency of preclinical research by group sequential designs. PLoS Biol 2017; 15:e2001307. [PMID: 28282371 PMCID: PMC5345756 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2001307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the potential benefits of sequential designs, studies evaluating treatments or experimental manipulations in preclinical experimental biomedicine almost exclusively use classical block designs. Our aim with this article is to bring the existing methodology of group sequential designs to the attention of researchers in the preclinical field and to clearly illustrate its potential utility. Group sequential designs can offer higher efficiency than traditional methods and are increasingly used in clinical trials. Using simulation of data, we demonstrate that group sequential designs have the potential to improve the efficiency of experimental studies, even when sample sizes are very small, as is currently prevalent in preclinical experimental biomedicine. When simulating data with a large effect size of d = 1 and a sample size of n = 18 per group, sequential frequentist analysis consumes in the long run only around 80% of the planned number of experimental units. In larger trials (n = 36 per group), additional stopping rules for futility lead to the saving of resources of up to 30% compared to block designs. We argue that these savings should be invested to increase sample sizes and hence power, since the currently underpowered experiments in preclinical biomedicine are a major threat to the value and predictiveness in this research domain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Konrad Neumann
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ulrike Grittner
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- * E-mail:
| | - Sophie K. Piper
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andre Rex
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Oscar Florez-Vargas
- Bio-health Informatics Group, School of Computer Science, The University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom
| | | | - Alice Schneider
- Department of Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Ian Wellwood
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Cambridge Institute of Public Health, University of Cambridge School of Clinical Medicine, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Bob Siegerink
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - John P. A. Ioannidis
- Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (METRICS), and Departments of Medicine, of Health Research and Policy, and of Statistics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, United States of America
| | - Jonathan Kimmelman
- STREAM Research Group, Biomedical Ethics Unit, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Ulrich Dirnagl
- Center for Stroke Research, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- NeuroCure Clinical Research Center, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Experimental Neurology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
- Center for Transforming Biomedical Research, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Neurodegenerative Diseases (DZNE), Berlin Site, Berlin, Germany
- German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Berlin site, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|