Serological Number for Characterization of Circulating Antibodies

Resemblance-Ranking Peptide Library to Screen for Binders to Antibodies on a Peptidomic Scale

A novel resemblance-ranking peptide library with 160,000 10-meric peptides was designed to search for selective binders to antibodies. The resemblance-ranking principle enabled the selection of sequences that are most similar to the human peptidome. The library was synthesized with ultra-high-density peptide arrays. As proof of principle, screens for selective binders were performed for the therapeutic anti-CD20 antibody rituximab. Several features in the amino acid composition of antibody-binding peptides were identified. The selective affinity of rituximab increased with an increase in the number of hydrophobic amino acids in a peptide, mainly tryptophan and phenylalanine, while a total charge of the peptide remained relatively small. Peptides with a higher affinity exhibited a lower sum helix propensity. For the 30 strongest peptide binders, a substitutional analysis was performed to determine dissociation constants and the invariant amino acids for binding to rituximab. The strongest selective peptides had a dissociation constant in the hundreds of the nano-molar range. The substitutional analysis revealed a specific hydrophobic epitope for rituximab. To show that conformational binders can, in principle, be detected in array format, cyclic peptide substitutions that are similar to the target of rituximab were investigated. Since the specific binders selected via the resemblance-ranking peptide library were based on the hydrophobic interactions that are widespread in the world of biomolecules, the library can be used to screen for potential linear epitopes that may provide information about the cross-reactivity of antibodies.

Species-Specific Immunoassay Aids Identification of Pathogen and Tracks Infectivity in Foot Infection

BACKGROUND

Conventional bacterial cultures frequently fail to identify the dominant pathogen in polymicrobial foot infections, in which Staphylococcus aureus is the most common infecting pathogen. Previous work has shown that species-specific immunoassays may be able to identify the main pathogen in musculoskeletal infections. We sought to investigate the clinical applicability of a S. aureus immunoassay to accurately identify the infecting pathogen and monitor its infectivity longitudinally in foot infection. We hypothesized that this species-specific immunoassay could aid in the diagnosis of S. aureus and track the therapeutic response in foot infections.

METHODS

From July 2015 to July 2019, 83 infected foot ulcer patients undergoing surgical intervention (debridement or amputation) were recruited and blood was drawn at 0, 4, 8, and 12 weeks. Whole blood was analyzed for S. aureus-specific serum antibodies (mix of historic and new antibodies) and plasmablasts were isolated and cultured to quantify titers of newly synthesized antibodies (NSAs). Anti-S. aureus antibody titers were compared with culture results to assess their concordance in identifying S. aureus as the pathogen. The NSA titer changes at follow-ups were compared with wound healing status to evaluate concordance between evolving host immune response and clinically resolving or relapsing infection.

RESULTS

Analysis of serum for anti-S. aureus antibodies showed significantly increased titers of 3 different anti-S. aureus antibodies, IsdH (P = .037), ClfB (P = .025), and SCIN (P = .005), in S. aureus culture-positive patients compared with culture-negative patients. Comparative analysis of combining antigens for S. aureus infection diagnosis increased the concordance further. During follow-up, changes of NSA titers against a single or combination of S. aureus antigens significantly correlated with clinically resolving or recurring infection represented by wound healing status.

CONCLUSION

In the management of foot infection, the use of S. aureus-specific immunoassay may aid in diagnosis of the dominant pathogen and monitoring of the host immune response against a specific pathogen in response to treatment. Importantly, this immunoassay could detect recurrent foot infection, which may guide a surgeon's decision to intervene.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective comparative study.