Concomitant Expression of Prolactin Receptor and TGFβ Receptors in Breast Cancer: Association with Less Aggressive Phenotype and Favorable Patient Outcome

In silico identification and in vitro evaluation of MRPS30-DT lncRNA and MRPS30 gene expression in breast cancer

BACKGROUND

It has been reported that long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) can play important roles in a variety of biological processes and cancer regulatory networks, including breast cancer.

AIMS

This study aimed to identify a novel upregulated lncRNA in breast cancer and its associated gene using bioinformatics analysis, and then evaluate their potential roles in breast cancer.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Extensive in silico studies were performed using various bioinformatics databases and tools to identify a potential upregulated breast cancer-associated lncRNA and its co-expressed gene, and to predict their potential roles, functions, and interactions. The expression level of MRPS30-DT lncRNA and MRPS30 was assessed in both BC tissues and cell lines using qRT-PCR technology. MRPS30-DT lncRNA and MRPS30 were selected as target genes using bioinformatics analysis. We found that MRPS30-DT and MRPS30 were significantly overexpressed in BC tissues compared with normal tissues. Also, MRPS30 showed upregulation in all three BC cell lines compared with HDF. On the other hand, MRPS30-DT significantly increased in MDA-MB-231 compared with HDF. While the expression of MRPS30-DT was significantly dropped in the resistance cell line MCF/MX compared to HDF and MCF7. Moreover, bioinformatics analysis suggested that MRPS30-DT and MRPS30 may play a potential role in BC through their involvement in some cancer signaling pathways and processes, as well as through their interaction with TFs, genes, miRNAs, and proteins related to carcinogenesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our findings showed the dysregulation of MRPS30-DT lncRNA and MRPS30 may provide clues for exploring new therapeutic targets or molecular biomarkers in BC.

Hormone-Dependent Cancers: New Aspects on Biochemistry and Molecular Pathology

Hormones, especially steroids, are closely involved in the physiological functions and proliferation of various target tissues and have long been known to play a key role in the tumorigenesis or carcinogenesis of these target tissues [...].

Bioinformatics analysis for the identification of key genes and long non-coding RNAs related to bone metastasis in breast cancer

The molecular mechanism of bone metastasis in breast cancer is largely unknown. Herein, we aimed to identify the key genes and long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) related to the bone metastasis of breast cancer using a bioinformatics approach. We screened differentially expressed genes and lncRNAs between normal breast and breast cancer bone metastasis samples using the GSE66206 dataset from the Gene Expression Omnibus. We also constructed a differentially expressed lncRNA-mRNA interaction network and analyzed the node degrees to identify the driving genes. After finding potential pathogenic modules of breast cancer bone metastasis, we identified breast cancer bone metastasis-related modules and functional enrichment analysis of the genes and lncRNAs in the modules. Based on the above analysis, we constructed a differentially expressed lncRNA-mRNA network related to bone metastasis in breast cancer and identified core driver genes, including BNIP3 and the lncRNA RP11-317-J19.1. The role of core driver genes and lncRNAs in the network implies their biological functions in regulating bone development and remodeling. Thus, targeting the core driver genes and lncRNAs in the network may be a promising therapeutic strategy to manage bone metastasis.

Progesterone receptor isoform-dependent cross-talk between prolactin and fatty acid synthase in breast cancer

Progesterone receptor (PR) isoforms can drive unique phenotypes in luminal breast cancer (BC). Here, we hypothesized that PR-B and PR-A isoforms differentially modify the cross-talk between prolactin and fatty acid synthase (FASN) in BC. We profiled the responsiveness of the FASN gene promoter to prolactin in T47D_co BC cells constitutively expressing PR-A and PR-B, in the PR-null variant T47D-Y cell line, and in PR-null T47D-Y cells engineered to stably re-express PR-A (T47D-YA) or PR-B (T47D-YB). The capacity of prolactin to up-regulate FASN gene promoter activity in T47D_co cells was lost in T47D-Y and TD47-YA cells. Constitutively up-regulated FASN gene expression in T47-YB cells and its further stimulation by prolactin were both suppressed by the prolactin receptor antagonist hPRL-G129R. The ability of the FASN inhibitor C75 to decrease prolactin secretion was more conspicuous in T47-YB cells. In T47D-Y cells, which secreted notably less prolactin and downregulated prolactin receptor expression relative to T47D_co cells, FASN blockade resulted in an augmented secretion of prolactin and up-regulation of prolactin receptor expression. Our data reveal unforeseen PR-B isoform-specific regulatory actions in the cross-talk between prolactin and FASN signaling in BC. These findings might provide new PR-B/FASN-centered predictive and therapeutic modalities in luminal intrinsic BC subtypes.

Prolactin: A hormone with diverse functions from mammary gland development to cancer metastasis

Prolactin has a rich mechanistic set of actions and signaling in order to elicit developmental effects in mammals. Historically, prolactin has been appreciated as an endocrine peptide hormone that is responsible for final, functional mammary gland development and lactation. Multiple signaling pathways impacted upon by the microenvironment contribute to cell function and differentiation. Endocrine, autocrine and paracrine signaling are now apparent in not only mammary development, but also in cancer, and involve multiple cell types including those of the immune system. Multiple ligands agonists are capable of binding to the prolactin receptor, potentially expanding receptor function. Prolactin has an important role not only in tumorigenesis of the breast, but also in a number of hormonally responsive cancers such as prostate, ovarian and endometrial cancer, as well as pancreatic and lung cancer. Although pituitary and extra-pituitary sources of prolactin such as the epithelium are important, stromal sourced prolactin is now also being recognized as an important factor in tumor progression, all of which potentially signal to multiple cell types in the tumor microenvironment. While prolactin has important roles in milk production including calcium and bone homeostasis, in the disease state it can also affect bone homeostasis. Prolactin also impacts metastatic cancer of the breast to modulate the bone microenvironment and promote bone damage. Prolactin has a fascinating contribution in both physiologic and pathologic settings of mammals.

Prolactin and androgen R1881 induce pro-survival carboxypeptidase-D and EDD E3 ligase in triple-negative and HER2+ breast cancer

Plasma membrane carboxypeptidase-D (CPD) hydrolyzes C-terminal arginine (Arg) from extracellular substrates, and Arg is converted into nitric oxide (NO) in the cell. CPD is upregulated by prolactin (PRL) and androgens in breast cancer (BCa) cells, increasing NO production to promote cell survival. EDD E3 ubiquitin ligase, upregulated by PRL/androgens, is implicated in TORC1 signaling. This study investigated CPD and EDD in triple-negative (TNBC) and HER2+ BCa. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed a negative correlation between CPD or EDD mRNA expression in TNBC patients and relapse-free survival. Immunohistochemistry showed that benign and malignant breast tissues stained abundantly for the PRL receptor (PRLR) and androgen receptor (AR). CPD and EDD staining were elevated in TNBC and HER2+ tumors as compared to benign tissues. In TNBC/HER2+ cell lines, CPD and EDD protein expression were upregulated by PRL or synthetic androgen methyltrienolone (R1881) at 3-6 h. PRL/R1881-induced CPD in TNBC and HER2+ cells increased intracellular NO production, which was abolished by PRLR antagonist ∆1-9-G129R-hPRL and AR antagonist flutamide. In turn, treatment with NO increased viability and decreased apoptosis in Arg-deprived TNBC cells. Cell viability and apoptosis were also affected in HER2+ cells with CPD knockdown. Lastly, EDD knockdown decreased PRL/R1881-induced phosphorylation of initiation factor 4E binding protein-1 and decreased 4E release in TNBC cells. In summary, PRL/R1881-induced CPD promotes TNBC/HER2+ cell survival through production of NO, and EDD promotes TNBC cell survival by TORC1 activation. This study implicates CPD and EDD as useful therapeutic targets for TNBC/HER2+ tumors, and suggests that PRLR and AR blockade are also beneficial to these patients.