Inhibition of Mitochondrial Complex I Impairs Release of α-Galactosidase by Jurkat Cells

Current and experimental therapeutics for Fabry disease

Fabry (or Anderson‐Fabry) is a rare pan‐ethnic disease affecting males and females. Fabry is an X‐linked lysosomal storage disease, affecting glycosphingolipid metabolism, that is caused by mutations of the GLA gene that codes for α‐galactosidase A. Fabry disease (FD) can be classified into a severe, classical phenotype, most often seen in men with no residual enzyme activity, that usually appear before 18 years and a usually milder, nonclassical (later‐onset) phenotype that usually appear above 18 years. Affected patients show multifactorial complications, including renal failure, cardiovascular problems, and neuropathy. In this review, we briefly report the clinical trials so far performed with the available therapies, and then we focus on the in vitro and the in vivo experimental models of the disease, to highlight the relevance in improving the existing therapeutics and understand the mechanism of this rare disorder. Current available in vivo and in vitro models can assist in better comprehension of the pathogenesis and underlying mechanisms of FD, thus the existing therapeutic approaches can be optimized, and new options can be developed.

Outcomes of Kidney Transplantation in Fabry Disease: A Meta-Analysis

Background: Fabry disease (FD) is a rare X-linked lysosomal storage disorder with progressive systemic deposition of globotriaosylceramide, leading to life-threatening cardiac, central nervous system, and kidney disease. Current therapy involves symptomatic medical management, enzyme replacement therapy (ERT), dialysis, kidney transplantation, and, more recently, gene therapy. The aim of this systematic review was to assess outcomes of kidney transplantation among patients with FD. Methods: A comprehensive literature review was conducted utilizing MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Database, from inception through to 28 February 2020, to identify studies that evaluate outcomes of kidney transplantation including patient and allograft survival among kidney transplant patients with FD. Effect estimates from each study were extracted and combined using the random-effects generic inverse variance method of DerSimonian and Laird. Results: In total, 11 studies, including 424 kidney transplant recipients with FD, were enrolled. The post-transplant median follow-up time ranged from 3 to 11.5 years. Overall, the pooled estimated rates of all-cause graft failure, graft failure before death, and allograft rejection were 32.5% (95%CI: 23.9%–42.5%), 14.5% (95%CI: 8.4%–23.7%), and 20.2% (95%CI: 15.4%–25.9%), respectively. In the sensitivity analysis, limited only to the recent studies (year 2001 or newer when ERT became available), the pooled estimated rates of all-cause graft failure, graft failure before death, and allograft rejection were 28.1% (95%CI: 20.5%–37.3%), 11.7% (95%CI: 8.4%–16.0%), and 20.2% (95%CI: 15.5%–26.0%), respectively. The pooled estimated rate of biopsy proven FD recurrence was 11.1% (95%CI: 3.6%–29.4%), respectively. There are no significant differences in the risks of all-cause graft failure (p = 0.10) or mortality (0.48) among recipients with vs. without FD. Conclusions: Despite possible FD recurrence after transplantation of 11.1%, allograft and patient survival are comparable among kidney transplant recipients with vs. without FD.