Instability of Non-Standard Microsatellites in Relation to Prognosis in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients

Preoperative contrast-enhanced CT imaging and clinicopathological characteristics analysis of mismatch repair-deficient colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer (CRC) can develop through various pathogenetic pathways, and one of the primary pathways is high microsatellite instability (MSI-H)/deficient mismatch repair (dMMR). This study investigated the correlation between preoperative contrast-enhanced CT (CECT) and clinicopathologic characteristics of colorectal cancer (CRC) according to different mismatch repair (MMR) statuses.

METHODS

From April 2021 to July 2022, a total of 281 CRC patients with preoperative CECT and available MMR status were enrolled from a single centre for this retrospective study. Preoperative CECT features and clinicopathologic characteristics were analysed. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used for statistical analysis. A nomogram was established based on the multivariate logistic regression results. Preoperative and postoperative dynamic nomogram prediction models were established. The C-index, a calibration plot, and clinical applicability of the two models were evaluated, and internal validation was performed using three methods.

RESULTS

In total, 249 patients were enrolled in the proficient mismatch repair (pMMR) group and 32 patients in the deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) group. In multivariate analysis, tumour location (right-hemi colon vs. left-hemi colon, odds ratio (OR) = 2.90, p = .036), the hypoattenuation-within-tumour ratio (HR) (HR > 2/3 vs. HR < 1/3, OR = 36.7, p < .001; HR 1/3-2/3 vs. HR < 1/3, OR = 6.05, p = .031), the number of lymph nodes with long diameter ≥ 8 mm on CECT (OR = 1.32, p = .01), CEA status (CEA positive vs. CEA negative, OR = 0.07, p = .002) and lymph node metastasis (OR = 0.45, p = .008) were independent risk factors for dMMR. Pre- and postoperative C-statistic were 0.861 and 0.908, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The combination of pre-operative CECT and clinicopathological characteristics of CRC correlates with MMR status, providing possible non-invasive MMR prediction. Particularly for dMMR CRC, tumour-draining lymph node status should be prudently evaluated by CECT.

Elevated microsatellite instability at selected tetranucleotide (EMAST) repeats in gastric cancer: a distinct microsatellite instability type with potential clinical impact?

We investigated the clinical impact of elevated microsatellite instability at selected tetranucleotide (EMAST) repeats in the context of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CTx) in gastric/gastro‐oesophageal adenocarcinomas. We analysed 583 resected tumours (272 without and 311 after CTx) and 142 tumour biopsies before CTx. If at least two or three of the five tetranucleotide repeat markers tested showed instability, the tumours were defined as EMAST (2+) or EMAST (3+), respectively. Expression of mismatch repair proteins including MSH3 was analysed using immunohistochemistry. Microsatellite instability (MSI) and Epstein–Barr virus (EBV) positivity were determined using standard assays. EMAST (2+) and (3+) were detected in 17.8 and 11.5% of the tumours, respectively. The frequency of EMAST (2+) or (3+) in MSI‐high (MSI‐H) tumours was 96.2 or 92.5%, respectively, demonstrating a high overlap with this molecular subtype, and the association of EMAST and MSI status was significant (each overall p < 0.001). EMAST (2+ or 3+) alone in MSI‐H and EBV‐negative tumours demonstrated only a statistically significant association of EMAST (2+) positivity and negative lymph node status (42.3% in EMAST (2+) and 28.8% in EMAST negative, p = 0.045). EMAST alone by neither definition was significantly associated with overall survival (OS) of the patients. The median OS for EMAST (2+) patients was 40.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.4–63.6) compared with 38.7 months (95% CI 26.3–51.1) for the EMAST‐negative group (p = 0.880). The median OS for EMAST (3+) patients was 46.7 months (95% CI 18.2–75.2) and 38.7 months (95% CI 26.2–51.2) for the negative group (p = 0.879). No statistically significant association with response to neoadjuvant CTx was observed (p = 0.992 and p = 0.433 for EMAST (2+) and (3+), respectively). In conclusion, our results demonstrate a nearly complete intersection between MSI‐H and EMAST and they indicate that EMAST alone is not a distinct instability type associated with noticeable clinico‐pathological characteristics of gastric carcinoma patients.

Lack of correlation between MSH3 immunohistochemistry and microsatellite analysis for the detection of elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) in colorectal cancers

Immunohistochemical evaluation of mismatch repair protein (MMR) expression is an important screening tool in diagnostic pathology, where it is routinely used to identify subsets of colorectal cancers (CRCs) with either inherited or sporadic forms of microsatellite instability (MSI). MSH3 is not included in current MMR panels, although aberrant MSH3 expression is reported to occur in 40-60% of CRCs and is associated with elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats (EMAST) and a worse prognosis. In this study, we applied MSH3 immunohistochemistry and tetranucleotide MSI analysis to a cohort of 250 unselected CRCs to evaluate the potential use of the methods in routine practice. Partial, complete, and focal loss of nuclear MSH3 and its cytoplasmic mislocalization were evident in 67% of tumors, whereas MSI was evident in two to six of a panel of six tetranucleotide repeats in 46% of cases. However, concordance between MSH3 immunohistochemistry and tetranucleotide MSI results was only 61%, indicating the unsuitability of this combination of tests in routine pathology practice. MSH3 immunostaining was compromised in areas of tissue crush and autolysis, which are common in biopsy and surgical samples, potentially mitigating against its routine use. Although tetranucleotide MSI is clearly evident in a subset of CRCs, further development of validated sets of tetranucleotide repeats and either MSH3 or other immunohistochemical markers will be required to include EMAST testing in the routine evaluation of CRCs in clinical practice.

Tetranucleotide and Low Microsatellite Instability Are Inversely Associated with the CpG Island Methylator Phenotype in Colorectal Cancer

Simple Summary

A type of DNA mismatch repair defect known as “elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats” (EMAST) is found across many different cancers. Tetranucleotide microsatellite instability, which is caused by MSH3 mismatch repair gene/protein loss-of-function, shares a molecular basis with “low microsatellite instability” (MSI-L) in colorectal cancer. Tetranucleotide microsatellite instability is also a byproduct of “high microsatellite instability” (MSI-H) that arises from deficiency of mismatch repair due to MSH2, MSH6, MLH1 or PMS2 gene alterations. MSH3-related EMAST is emerging as a biomarker of poor prognosis in colorectal cancer and needs to be clearly differentiated from MSI-H. Here, we show that tumours with non-MSI-H-related EMAST or MSI-L rarely show concordant promoter methylation of multiple marker genes. Colorectal tumours that are positive for a single (1/5) tetranucleotide repeat marker are an important subset of the EMAST spectrum.

Abstract

MSH3 gene or protein deficiency or loss-of-function in colorectal cancer can cause a DNA mismatch repair defect known as “elevated microsatellite alterations at selected tetranucleotide repeats” (EMAST). A high percentage of MSI-H tumors exhibit EMAST, while MSI-L is also linked with EMAST. However, the distribution of CpG island methylator phenotype (CIMP) within the EMAST spectrum is not known. Five tetranucleotide repeat and five MSI markers were used to classify 100 sporadic colorectal tumours for EMAST, MSI-H and MSI-L according to the number of unstable markers detected. Promoter methylation was determined using methylation-specific PCR for MSH3, MCC, CDKN2A (p16) and five CIMP marker genes. EMAST was found in 55% of sporadic colorectal carcinomas. Carcinomas with only one positive marker (EMAST-1/5, 26%) were associated with advanced tumour stage, increased lymph node metastasis, MSI-L and lack of CIMP-H. EMAST-2/5 (16%) carcinomas displayed some methylation but MSI was rare. Carcinomas with ≥3 positive EMAST markers (13%) were more likely to have a proximal colon location and be MSI-H and CIMP-H. Our study suggests that EMAST/MSI-L is a valuable prognostic and predictive marker for colorectal carcinomas that do not display the high methylation phenotype CIMP-H.