Optimizing PSMA Radioligand Therapy for Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy with [177Lu]Lu-LNC1011 for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: a pilot study

BACKGROUND

Preclinical studies have shown that the long-acting PSMA-targeting radiopharmaceutical [177Lu]Lu-LNC1011 based on dansylated amino acid modification had high tumor uptake and prolonged retention. This study aimed to explore its safety and efficacy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

Eight mCRPC patients who met the inclusion criteria received intravenous treatment with [177Lu]Lu-LNC1011. Treatment was repeated every 6 weeks for up to a maximum of 6 cycles. Molecular imaging and hematology markers were the main evaluation indicators. The primary endpoints were biochemical (PSA) response and molecular imaging response. Toxicity grading was assessed using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0.

RESULTS

Hematological toxicity was the primary side effect. In all patients, adverse events (AEs) after [177Lu]Lu-LNC1011 treatment were primarily characterized by decreased levels of hemoglobin, white blood cells and platelets. Grade 3 anemia was recorded in 1 patient, and grade 2 leukopenia and thrombocytopenia were recorded in 4 patients. The average systemic effective dose was 0.18 mSv/MBq, and the kidney was the organ with the highest absorbed dose (3.11 ± 0.26 mSv/MBq). Long half-life (71.30 ± 8.23 h) and high absorbed dose [5.77, (range 5.5-14 Gy/GBq)] were calculated in the lesions. All patients had a more than 50% decline of PSA during treatment, and one patient dropped to 0 ng/mL. According to assessment criteria adapted from the PERCIST v.1.0 criteria, complete response, partial response, and disease progression were observed in 2 (25%), 4 (50%), and 2 (25%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

[177Lu]Lu-LNC1011 was well tolerated and had acceptable side effects for PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy. Tumor lesions received high radiation doses and had excellent responses to the treatment. Dose escalation studies in a larger number of patients are worth pursuing and necessary to confirm these results. URL OF REGISTRY: https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06809426?term=NCT06809 .

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT06809426, registration date: 2025-01-23.

Hematological toxicity of [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 in RM1-PGLS syngeneic mouse model

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PC) has a 34% 5-year survival rate after progressing to metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), which occurs in 20-30% of cases. Treatments like chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (RLT) show promise, but challenges remain with tumor resistance, side effects, and dose-limiting toxicity in kidneys and bone marrow. This study investigated the hematotoxicity, treatment efficacy, and recovery after [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 and [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 treatment in a syngeneic PC mouse model.

METHOD

Twenty-five male C57BL/6 mice were inoculated with RM1-PGLS cells and monitored using [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT. The mice were divided into five groups as follows: (1) [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 treatment with tumors, (2) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment with tumors, (3) control group with tumors, (4) [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 treatment without tumors, and (5) [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 treatment without tumors. Tumor volume was measured weekly, and animals were sacrificed when tumors reached 1.5 cm³. Endpoint criteria included tumor size, survival, and body mass. Blood samples were collected at different time points to assess blood cell counts and liver and kidney function.

RESULTS

Both treatments significantly slowed tumor progression and extended survival. [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617-treated mice had a median survival of 70 days, compared to 58 days for [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617-treated mice and 30 days for the control group. Tumor volumes were significantly reduced in both treatment groups (P < 0.05). Hematological analysis showed that both treatments reduced WBCs, RBCs, and platelets, but values normalized within 35-42 days. Liver and kidney functions remained unaffected, and no significant renal or hepatic toxicity was observed.

CONCLUSION

Both [225Ac]Ac-PSMA-617 and [177Lu]Lu-PSMA-617 caused transient hematotoxicity without prolonged effects. The data do not explicitly support the necessity of immunocompetent models for studying therapeutic outcomes in this context. Future studies incorporating immune profiling are warranted to investigate immune system interactions in radioligand therapy further.

The Application of Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Prostate Cancer: Status and Challenge

In recent years, the incidence of prostate cancer has been increasing globally. Early stage of the disease can obtain a better clinical prognosis from surgery and endocrine therapy. The progression of advanced stage varies significantly between individuals, with some patients developing metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer after standardized treatment. Therefore, staging of prostate cancer by accurate imaging is particularly important for the clinical management of patients. Simultaneously, the development of targeted therapy is also urgent for the treatment of advanced prostate cancer. Prostate specific membrane antigen as a prostate specific target has been widely used in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer. This review summarizes the latest research progress of targeted prostate specific membrane antigen in the diagnosis and treatment of prostate cancer in detail, analyzes their value and challenges.

Outcomes and prognostic predictors of Lu-177 PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (Asian Population Study)

AIM

Lutetium-177 (Lu-177) prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) is a promising therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but there is limited data of its efficacy and safety in Asian population. We aim to explore the clinical outcomes of Lu-177 PSMA-RLT in this population.

METHODS

We evaluated 84 patients with progressive mCRPC receiving Lu-177 PSMA-RLT between 9 May 2018 and 21 February 2022. Lu-177-PSMA-I&T was administered at 6-8-week intervals. Primary end point was overall survival (OS), and secondary end points included prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression-free survival (PFS), PSA response rate, clinical response, toxicity assessment, and prognostic indicators.

RESULTS

The median OS and PSA PFS were 12.2 and 5.2 months, respectively. PSA decline of ≥50% was observed in 51.8% of patients. Patients achieving PSA response had longer median OS (15.0 vs. 9.5 months, p = .03) and PSA PFS (6.5 vs. 2.9 months, p < .001). Pain score improvement was seen in 19 out of 34 patients. A hematotoxicity of ≥grade 3 was observed in 13 out of 78 patients. Multivariable analyses showed that PSA velocity, alkaline phosphatase, hemoglobin (Hb), and the number of treatment cycles were independent prognostic indicators for OS. The retrospective design was the main limitation of the study.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrated a similar safety and efficacy of Lu-177 PSMA-RLT in Asian mCRPC patients compared to the existing literature. A PSA decline ≥50% was associated with longer OS and PSA PFS. Several prognostic indicators for patient outcomes were also identified.

A phase 2, single-arm trial evaluating 131 I-PSMA-1095 targeted radioligand therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains uniformly lethal. Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a transmembrane glycoprotein overexpressed in prostate cancer. 131 I-PSMA-1095 (also known as 131 I-MIP-1095) is a PSMA-targeted radioligand which selectively delivers therapeutic radiation to cancer cells and the tumor microenvironment.

METHODS

We conducted a single-arm, phase 2 trial to assess efficacy and tolerability of 131 I-PSMA-1095 in mCRPC patients who had exhausted all lines of approved therapy. All patients underwent 18 F-DCFPyL PET and 18 F-FDG PET to determine PSMA-positive tumor volume, and patients with >50% PSMA-positive tumor volume were treated with up to four doses of 131 I-PSMA-1095. The primary endpoint was the response rate of prostate specific antigen (PSA). Secondary endpoints included rates of radiographic response and adverse events. Overall and radiographic progression-free survival were also analyzed.

RESULTS

Eleven patients were screened for inclusion and nine patients received 131 I-PSMA-1095. The median baseline PSA was 162 µg/l, and six patients demonstrated a >50% PSA decrease. One patient demonstrated a confirmed radiographic response. Median overall survival was 10.3 months, and median progression-free survival was 5.4 months. Four patients experienced adverse events of grade 3 or higher, the most frequent being thrombocytopenia and anemia.

CONCLUSION

131 I-PSMA-1095 is highly active against heavily-pretreated PSMA-positive mCRPC, significantly decreasing tumor burden as measured by PSA. Adverse events, mainly hematologic toxicity, were not infrequent, likely related to off-target irradiation. This hematologic toxicity, as well as a higher logistical burden associated with use, could represent relative disadvantages of 131 I-PSMA-1095 compared to 177 Lu-PSMA-617.

Review on the Increasing Role for PSMA-Based Radioligand Therapy in Prostate Cancer

In 2021, two randomized controlled trials (RCTs), TheraP and VISION, demonstrated that 177Lu-PSMA-617 as monotherapy was more effective for the decline of PSA than the comparator third-line treatments.

METHODS

Our review summarizes new RCTs that add to the use of radioligand therapy (RLT) for patients with high-risk prostate cancer (PCa).

RESULTS

Four past and present RCTs included 1081 patients. An RCT, ENZA-p, studied first-line treatment of patients with metastatic castration-resistant PCa (mCRPC). A combination of enzalutamide (ENZA) and 177Lu-PSMA-617 gave longer progression-free survival than ENZA as monotherapy. Other RCTs of patients with mCRPC, including the PSMAfore, and SPLASH trials, showed 177Lu-PSMA-617 as second-line treatment gave better progression-free survival than androgen receptor pathway inhibitors (combined p value < 6.9 × 10-6).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PCa gain if they are given PSMA-RLT early in the treatment of PCa and as part of combination therapies.

177Lu-PSMA-617 in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer: A Review of the Evidence and Implications for Canadian Clinical Practice

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is highly expressed in prostate cancer and a therapeutic target. Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA-617 is the first radioligand therapy to be approved in Canada for use in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). As this treatment represents a new therapeutic class, guidance regarding how to integrate it into clinical practice is needed. This article aims to review the evidence from prospective phase 2 and 3 clinical trials and meta-analyses of observational studies on the use of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in prostate cancer and discuss how Canadian clinicians might best apply these data in practice. The selection of appropriate patients, the practicalities of treatment administration, including necessary facilities for treatment procedures, the assessment of treatment response, and the management of adverse events are considered. Survival benefits were observed in clinical trials of 177Lu-PSMA-617 in patients with progressive, PSMA-positive mCRPC who were pretreated with androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and taxanes, as well as in taxane-naïve patients. However, the results of ongoing trials are awaited to clarify questions regarding the optimal sequencing of 177Lu-PSMA-617 with other therapies, as well as the implications of predictive biomarkers, personalized dosimetry, and combinations with other therapies.

Theranostics revolution in prostate cancer: Basics, clinical applications, open issues and future perspectives

In the last years, theranostics has expanded the therapeutic options available for prostate cancer patients. In this review, we explore this dynamic field and its potential to revolutionize precision medicine for prostate cancer. We delve into the foundational principles, clinical applications, and emerging opportunities, emphasizing the potential synergy between radioligand therapy and other systemic treatments. Additionally, we address the ongoing challenges, including optimizing patient selection, assessing treatment responses, and determining the role of theranostics within the broader landscape of prostate cancer treatment.

PSMA-targeted radioligand therapy in prostate cancer: current status and future prospects

INTRODUCTION

The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) targeted radioligand therapy (PRLT) for the treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients has generated significant interest among the oncologic community, with several publications documenting good response rates and survival benefits with low toxicity profiles.

AREAS COVERED

Indications, patient preparation, dose administration, post-treatment imaging, dosimetry, and side effect profiles of 177Lu-PSMA-617 are discussed in this article. We also discuss results from prospective studies, major retrospective studies, meta-analyses, clinical trials, and mentioned major ongoing clinical trials on PRLT. We have also portrayed our own experiences and future perspectives on PRLT.

EXPERT OPINION

For PRLT, PSMA-617 and PSMA-I&T molecules have revolutionized the theranostic approach in the management of advanced prostate cancer, with solid backing from several published articles showing favorable outcomes and an excellent safety profile of 177Lu-PSMA-617. Improvement in quality of life and survival was seen in the majority of mCRPC patients after 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT. Patients with good performance status, asymptomatic, only lymph node metastases, high PSMA expressing lesions, and no discordant FDG avid lesions have a longer survival after 177Lu-PSMA-617 PRLT than patients with poor performance status, symptomatic, hepatic, brain, and skeletal metastases, discordant PSMA, and FDG-avid lesions. Docetaxel and cabazitaxel are approved treatments for mCRPC patients. 177Lu-PSMA-617 is approved as a third-line systemic treatment for mCRPC patients with failure to respond to androgen receptor pathway inhibitors and docetaxel therapy. PRLT is a safe and effective alternative to cabazitaxel (third-line systemic treatment), but it has a higher cost. 177Lu-PSMA-617 could be a more efficient therapeutic option for mCRPC patients as first-line or combined therapy, and it may be a useful therapeutic option for the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC) patients. Several clinical studies and clinical trials on PRLT are currently underway. In the future, the results of these trials will be helpful in evolving treatment strategies for prostate cancer patients.

Efficacy and Safety of Actinium-225 Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen Radioligand Therapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Metanalysis

BACKGROUND

Actinium-225 (Ac-225) labelled PSMA RLT has been tested recently in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), with encouraging results. Ac-225, being an alpha emitter, is expected to have higher efficacy and fewer side effects compared to the beta-emitters such as Lutetium-177. We have performed a meta-analysis to assess the therapeutic responses, survival effects, and significant side effects of Ac-225 PSMA RLT in patients with mCRPC.

METHODOLOGY

Systematic literature search was carried out from five electronic databases PubMed/MEDLINE, SCOPUS, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library until March 2021. Eight studies were found to be eligible for this metanalysis.

RESULTS

Eight studies with 226 patients were analyzed in this metanalysis. 81% (95% CI 73-89) patients had a decline in PSA levels. 60% of the patients showed more than 50% PSA decline. Two studies assessed survival effects of radioligand naïve patients compared to patients who had received Lu-PSMA therapy previously and the pooled HR for radioligand naïve patients is 0.22. The most common toxicity reported was xerostomia in 167 patients out of 226 patients (73.9%, 95% CI 67.6-79.5%); however, most of them were confined to grade I and II levels. Other reported side effects include hematologic toxicity and nephrotoxicity.

CONCLUSION

Ac-PSMA RLT is a safe and potentially effective treatment option for patients with mCRPC.

Response to [ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients presenting with only lymph node metastases

OBJECTIVE

[ 177 Lu]Lu-PSMA radioligand therapy (PSMA-RLT) is a promising therapy for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and offers a survival benefit particularly to patients with only lymph node metastases. We therefore sought to evaluate the clinical outcome of this therapy in such a cohort.

METHODS

Of all prostate cancer patients admitted to our department between September 2015 and March 2019 to receive 1-4 courses of PSMA-RLT (each course consisted of three cycles of highly standardized PSMA-RLT every 4 weeks), only 10 consecutive men were found to have nodal metastases only and were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

Nine out of 10 patients responded to their first PSMA-RLT course with a mean prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline of 71.8 ± 25.2%, seven of them demonstrated a PSA decline of ≥50%. Collectively, seven of eight patients responded to further PSMA-RLT courses with a total PSA reduction of 59.8 ± 30.0%, five of which showed a PSA reduction of ≥50%. One patient experienced complete remission. Median progression-free survival was 85 weeks (range 14-255 weeks) and median overall survival was not reached during the median observation time of 209 weeks (30-298 weeks). Univariate Cox-regression identified initial PSA decline as the only predictive parameter for progression-free survival ( P = 0.047).

CONCLUSION

mCRPC patients with only lymph node metastases showed favorable survival and excellent response to PSMA-RLT, leading to transient partial remission of the disease in most of them.

Current role of prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging and radioligand therapy in castration-resistant prostate cancer

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is a therapy-resistant and lethal form of prostate cancer as well as a therapeutic challenge. Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has been proved as a promising molecular target for optimizing the theranostics for CRPC patients. When combined with PSMA radiotracers, novel molecular imaging techniques such as positron emission tomography (PET) can provide more accurate and expedient identification of metastases when compared with conventional imaging techniques. Based on the PSMA-based PET scans, the accurate visualization of local and disseminative lesions may help in metastasis-directed therapy. Moreover, the combination of ⁶⁸Ga-labeled PSMA-based PET imaging and radiotherapy using PSMA radioligand therapy (RLT) becomes a novel treatment option for CRPC patients. The existing studies have demonstrated this therapeutic strategy as an effective and well-tolerated therapy among CRPC patients. PSMA-based PET imaging can accurately detect CRPC lesions and describe their molecular features with quantitative parameters, which can be used to select the best choice of treatments, monitor the response, and predict the outcome of RLT. This review discussed the current and potential role of PSMA‐based imaging and RLT in the diagnosis, treatment, and prediction of prognosis of CRPC.

Update of PSMA Theranostics in Prostate Cancer: Current Applications and Future Trends

There is now an increasing trend for targeting cancers to go beyond early diagnosis and actually improve Progression-Free Survival and Overall Survival. Identifying patients who might benefit from a particular targeted treatment is the main focus for Precision Medicine. Radiolabeled ligands can be used as predictive biomarkers which can confirm target expression by cancers using positron emission tomography (PET). The same ligand can subsequently be labeled with a therapeutic radionuclide for targeted radionuclide therapy. This combined approach is termed “Theranostics”. The prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has emerged as an attractive diagnostic and therapeutic target for small molecule ligands in prostate cancer. It can be labeled with either positron emitters for PET-based imaging or beta and alpha emitters for targeted radionuclide therapy. This review article summarizes the important concepts for Precision Medicine contributing to improved diagnosis and targeted therapy of patients with prostate cancer and we identify some key learning points and areas for further research.

Know thy tumour: Biomarkers to improve treatment of molecular radionuclide therapy

Molecular radionuclide therapy (MRT) is an effective treatment for both localised and disseminated tumours. Biomarkers can be used to identify potential subtypes of tumours that are known to respond better to standard MRT protocols. These enrolment-based biomarkers can further be used to develop dose-response relationships using image-based dosimetry within these defined subtypes. However, the biological identity of the cancers treated with MRT are commonly not well-defined, particularly for neuroendocrine neoplasms. The biological heterogeneity of such cancers has hindered the establishment of dose-responses and minimum tumour dose thresholds. Biomarkers could also be used to determine normal tissue MRT dose limits and permit greater injected doses of MRT in patients. An alternative approach is to understand the repair capacity limits of tumours using radiobiology-based biomarkers within and outside patient cohorts currently treated with MRT. It is hoped that by knowing more about tumours and how they respond to MRT, biomarkers can provide needed dimensionality to image-based biodosimetry to improve MRT with optimized protocols and personalised therapies.

Net theranostics

Theranostics is a term coined by combining the words “therapeutics” and “diagnostics,” referring to single chemical entities developed to deliver therapy and diagnosis simultaneously. Neuroendocrine tumors are rare cancers that occur in various organs of the body, and they express neuroendocrine factors such as chromogranin A and somatostatin receptor. Somatostatin analogs bind to somatostatin receptor, and when combined with diagnostic radionuclides, such as gamma‐emitters, are utilized for diagnosis of neuroendocrine tumor. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy when combined with therapeutic radionuclides, such as beta‐emitters, are effective in treating neuroendocrine tumor as peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. Somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy are some of the most frequently used and successful theranostics for neuroendocrine tumor. In Japan, radiopharmaceuticals are regulated under a complex law system, creating a significant drug lag, which is a major public concern. It took nearly 10 years to obtain the approval for somatostatin receptor scintigraphy and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy use by the Japanese government. In 2021, ¹¹¹Lu‐DOTATATE (Lutathera), a drug for peptide receptor radionuclide therapy, was covered by insurance in Japan. In this review, we summarize the history of the development of neuroendocrine tumor theranostics and theranostics in general, as therapeutic treatment for cancer in the future. Furthermore, we briefly address the Japanese point of view regarding the development of new radiopharmaceuticals.

Biomarkers to personalize treatment with 177Lu-PSMA-617 in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer - a state of the art review

Radioligand therapy with Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) has shown to prolong survival in metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). One of the major challenges for clinicians in the future is to select those patients who would benefit most from this therapy to position it in the treatment landscape of mCRPC. This, in turn, will lead to the delivery of personalized therapies. In this narrative review article we summarize recent studies investigating both predictive and prognostic clinical, imaging-based, and molecular biomarkers to predict treatment response to 177Lu-PSMA-617 radioligand therapy with the aim of identifying men who should be considered for this approach. Of note, the evidence on the role of biomarkers currently relies on small retrospective trials and their validation in larger prospective cohorts is necessary before these results can be translated in the clinical practice.

A review of advances in the last decade on targeted cancer therapy using 177Lu: focusing on 177Lu produced by the direct neutron activation route

Lutetium-177 [T½ = 6.76 d; Eβ (max) = 0.497 MeV; maximum tissue range ~2.5 mm; 208 keV γ-ray] is one of the most important theranostic radioisotope used for the management of various oncological and non-oncological disorders. The present review chronicles the advancement in the last decade in 177Lu-radiopharmacy with a focus on 177Lu produced via direct 176Lu (n, γ) 177Lu nuclear reaction in medium flux research reactors. The specific nuances of 177Lu production by various routes are described and their pros and cons are discussed. Lutetium, is the last element in the lanthanide series. Its chemistry plays a vital role in the preparation of a wide variety of radiopharmaceuticals which demonstrate appreciable in vivo stability. Traditional bifunctional chelators (BFCs) that are used for 177Lu-labeling are discussed and the upcoming ones are highlighted. Research efforts that resulted in the growth of various 177Lu-based radiopharmaceuticals in preclinical and clinical settings are provided. This review also summarizes the results of clinical studies with potent 177Lu-based radiopharmaceuticals that have been prepared using medium specific activity 177Lu produced by direct neutron activation route in research reactors. Overall, the review amply demonstrates the practicality of the medium specific activity 177Lu towards formulation of various clinically useful radiopharmaceuticals, especially for the benefit of millions of cancer patients in developing countries with limited reactor facilities.

Should Lutetium-prostate specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy for metastatic prostate cancer be used earlier in men with lymph node only metastatic prostate cancer?

PURPOSE

Lutetium labelled prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (Lu-PSMA RLT) has shown pleasing early results in management of high-volume metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), but its role in the early treatment of men with only lymph node metastasis (LNM) is unknown. The aim was to assess the outcome of Lu-PSMA RLT earlier in the treatment of men with only LNM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Single institution retrospective review of men with only LNM on staging Ga-PSMA PET PSMA who proceeded with Lu-PSMA RLT.

RESULTS

There were 17 men with only LNM, including 13 with mCRPC and 3 who were both hormone and chemotherapy naïve. The median PSA was 3.7 (0.46-120 ng/mL). A PSA decline of ≥50% occurred in 10/17 (58.8%), decreasing to <0.2 ng/mL in 35.3% (6/17). The PSA continues to decline or remain stable in 10/17 (58.8%) with a median follow-up of 13 months, and 8/17 (47.1%) have not reached their pre-treatment levels. There were no significant side effects. There was a better PSA response in men without prior chemotherapy (p=0.05). The prostate cancer specific and overall survival is 82.4% (14/17).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results identify improved PSA response to Lu-PSMA RLT in men with only LNM, especially in the chemotherapy naïve cohort, compared to previous series with more advanced mCRPC. These findings provide important proof of principle to aid with planning of future prospective randomized trials evaluating the role of Lu-PSMA RLT earlier in the management of node metastatic prostate cancer, including men naïve of ADT and chemotherapy.

In vitro and in vivo comparative study of a novel 68Ga-labeled PSMA-targeted inhibitor and 68Ga-PSMA-11

⁶⁸Ga-radiolabeled small molecules that specifically target prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) have been extensively investigated, and some of these tracers have been used in the diagnosis of prostate cancer via ⁶⁸Ga-positron emission tomography (⁶⁸Ga-PET). Nevertheless, current ⁶⁸Ga-labeled radiotracers show only fair detection rates for metastatic prostate cancer lesions, especially those with lower levels of prostate specific antigen (PSA), which often occurs in the biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. The goal of this study was to design and synthesize a new PSMA-targeted radiotracer, ⁶⁸Ga-SC691, with high affinity for prostate cancer cells and excellent pharmacokinetics. To this end, structural optimization was carried out on the bifunctional group, target motif, and linker while the high affinity targeting scaffold remained. To explore its potential in the clinic, a comparative study was further performed in vitro and in vivo between ⁶⁸Ga-SC691 and ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11, a clinically approved tracer for PSMA-positive prostate cancer. SC691 was radiolabeled to provide ⁶⁸Ga-SC691 in 99% radiolabeling yield under mild conditions. High uptake and a high internalization ratio into LNCaP cells were observed in in vitro studies. In vivo studies showed that ⁶⁸Ga-SC691 had favorable biodistribution properties and could specifically accumulate on PSMA-positive LNCaP xenografts visualized by micro-PET/CT. This radiotracer showed excellent PET imaging quality and comparable, if not higher, uptake in LNCaP xenografts than ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11.

177Lu-PSMA Radioligand Therapy Is Favorable as Third-Line Treatment of Patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer. A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

In this systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA), we aimed to assess the benefits and harms of third-line (L3) treatments in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Two reviewers searched for publications from 1 January 2006 to 30 June 2021. The review analyzed seven RCTs that included 3958 patients and eight treatments. Treatment with prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-based radioligand therapy (PRLT) resulted in a 1.3-times-higher rate of median PSA decline ≥50% than treatment with abiraterone, enzalutamide, mitoxantrone, or cabazitaxel (p = 0.00001). The likelihood was 97.6% for PRLT to bring about the best PSA response, out of the examined treatments. PRLT resulted in a 1.1-times-higher six-month rate of median radiographic progression-free survival. Treatment with PRLT in the VISION trial resulted in 1.05-times-higher twelve-month median overall survival than L3 treatment with cabazitaxel in other RCTs. PRLT more often resulted in severe thrombocytopenia and less often in severe leukopenia than did cabazitaxel. In conclusion, for patients with mCRPC, L3 treatment with PRLT is highly effective and safe.

Update on radioligand therapy with 177Lu-PSMA for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: clinical aspects and survival effects

OBJECTIVE

To give an updated overview on clinical aspects and survival effects of lutetium-177-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA) radioligand therapy (RLT), a novel treatment option for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC).

METHODS

PubMed/MEDLINE database was searched for relevant articles published up to March 2021. The search was restricted to English-language articles.

RESULTS

Current evidence from the literature consistently demonstrated the efficacy, safety, and survival benefit of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT in mCRPC. However, current data rely predominantly on retrospective analyses, showing heterogeneity of patient population and treatment protocols. More recently, results from the first randomized phase II study (TheraP) demonstrated that ¹⁷⁷Lu-PMSA therapy significantly improved prostate-specific antigen response rate (66% vs 37%) and had fewer grade 3/4 adverse events when compared to cabazitaxel in patients with docetaxel-pretreated, progressive mCRPC. This review is intended to provide an updated overview of treatment protocols and responses, toxicity profile, and survival effects of ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT.

CONCLUSIONS

¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT has emerged as a promising targeted treatment in mCRPC. It is currently applied in compassionate use programs and following exhaustion of approved therapies. Crucial for establishing this treatment in routine clinical management will be the results of the phase III VISION trial, which may confirm the encouraging patient outcomes reported to date.

PSMA Theranostics: Current Landscape and Future Outlook

INTRODUCTION

Prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is a promising novel molecular target for imaging diagnostics and therapeutics (theranostics). There has been a growing body of evidence supporting PSMA theranostics approaches in optimizing the management of prostate cancer and potentially altering its natural history.

METHODS

We utilized PubMed and Google Scholar for published studies, and clinicaltrials.gov for planned, ongoing, and completed clinical trials in PSMA theranostics as of June 2021. We presented evolving evidence for various PSMA-targeted radiopharmaceutical agents in the treatment paradigm for prostate cancer, as well as combination treatment strategies with other targeted therapy and immunotherapy. We highlighted the emerging evidence of PSMA and fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT as a predictive biomarker for PSMA radioligand therapy. We identified seven ongoing clinical trials in oligometastatic-directed therapy using PSMA PET imaging. We also presented a schematic overview of 17 key PSMA theranostic clinical trials throughout the various stages of prostate cancer.

CONCLUSIONS

In this review, we presented the contemporary and future landscape of theranostic applications in prostate cancer with a focus on PSMA ligands. As PSMA theranostics will soon become the standard of care for the management of prostate cancer, we underscore the importance of integrating nuclear medicine physicians into the multidisciplinary team.

177Lu-PSMA-RLT of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: limitations and improvements

The prevalence of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) is increasing, and its prognosis is often poor. As a highly expressed target in mCRPC, prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) is very attractive for its diagnosis and treatment. When the efficacy of chemical therapy is limited, radioligand therapy (RLT)-based on Lutetium-177 (177Lu)-PSMA has received more research as an emerging treatment. To date, most published related studies have proven this method is effective and safe. However, about 1/3 of mCRPC patients have not benefited from 177Lu-PSMA-RLT. The underlying mechanism of this phenomenon remains unclear. So based on the comprehensive research in recent years, this article proposes the possible reasons, including tumor lesions, PSMA heterogeneity, differences in DNA repair defects, and accelerated repopulation. Combining with the existing experience to give suggestions to improve the treatment efficacy, benefit more mCRPC patients.

Lutetium-177 Labelled PSMA Targeted Therapy in Advanced Prostate Cancer: Current Status and Future Perspectives

Patients suffering from metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) have a poor prognosis. As a further treatment option ¹⁷⁷Lutetium (Lu) prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) radioligand therapy gained a significant interest of many investigators. Several publications showed great response and prolonged survival with limited adverse events. However, to this point, it still remains unclear which patients benefit the most from ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA therapy, and how to improve the treatment regimen to achieve best outcome while minimizing potential adverse events. The efficacy for mCRPC patients is a given fact, and with the newly published results of the VISION trial its approval is only a matter of time. Recently, investigators started to focus on treating prostate cancer patients in earlier disease stages and in combination with other compounds. This review gives a brief overview of the current state and the future perspectives of ¹⁷⁷Lu labelled PSMA radioligand therapy.

The application of theranostics in different stages of prostate cancer

Despite the remarkable achievements in treating metastatic prostate cancer over the last two decades, castrate-resistant status is still considered the lethal stage of the disease. Theranostics combines a targeting compound (ligand) with a therapeutic radioisotope (radioactive particle) injected into the blood to target the cancer cells. The most studied radioligand is ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA-617, which targets PSMA, a protein found in prostate cancer cells. This new approach has shown promising results in treating metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Currently, many trials are using PSMA-targeting radioligands in combination with conventional therapies in advanced prostate cancer or even in the earlier stages of the disease. Other preclinical trials are exploring the possibility of using newer ligands or radioisotopes to treat prostate cancer to increase the specificity and efficacy of this treatment.

Lu177-PSMA therapy for men with advanced prostate cancer: 18 months survival analysis in a single Australian tertiary institution

INTRODUCTION

Radioligand therapies, or 'theranostics', have an emerging role in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Lutetium-177 (Lu), targeting prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA), has demonstrated promising outcomes including reduced disease progression and improved overall survival. We aim to determine overall survival demonstrated by our LuPSMA patient cohort to date.

METHODS

Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test were performed on all LuPSMA therapy patients with at least 12 months of follow-up data available (n = 68). Comparison across patients was made based on several variables including the baseline characteristics of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level, maximum standard uptake value (SUV_max ) and metastasis site and by biochemical response.

RESULTS

The 18-month overall survival estimate for the patient cohort was 63.8%. Patients with baseline serum PSA <20 µg/L had a greater 18-month survival estimate (79.9%) compared to PSA ≥20 µg/L (53.8%; P < 0.05). Patients with an SUV_max  >15 had an 18-month survival estimate of 56.0%, compared to 38.0% in patients with SUV_max  ≤15 (P < 0.05). No significant difference in overall survival was observed by metastasis site. Both a decrease in PSA after two LuPSMA therapy cycles and the maximum response over the treatment course being a decline in PSA were indicative of greater overall survival (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001 respectively).

CONCLUSION

Our study reported an 18-month overall survival of 64% in patients with mCRPC who have undergone LuPSMA therapy. Our study identified that baseline serum PSA, SUV_max and biochemical response to treatment are prognostic markers for increased overall survival.

177Lu-PSMA Therapy in Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

The aim of this narrative review is to evaluate the current status of 177Lu-PSMA (prostate specific membrane antigen) therapy for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) in the light of the current literature. We also addressed patient preparation, therapy administration and side effect profiles. 177Lu-PSMA therapy efficacy was assessed by using prospective trials, meta-analyses and major retrospective trials. Predictors of efficacy were also mentioned. Although there are some different approaches regarding the use of 177Lu-PSMA therapy in different countries, this type of therapy is generally safe, with a low toxicity profile. From the oncological point of view, a PSA (prostate specific antigen) decline of ≥50% was seen in 10.6-69% of patients with mCRPC; whereas progression-free survival (PFS) was reported to be 3-13.7 months in different studies. Consequently, 177Lu-PSMA therapy is a promising treatment in patients with mCRPC, with good clinical efficacy, even in heavily pretreated patients with multiple lines of systemic therapy. Currently, there are ongoing clinical trials in the United States, including a phase III multicenter FDA registration trial.

Efficacy and Haematologic Toxicity of Palliative Radioligand Therapy of Metastatic Castrate-Resistant Prostate Cancer with Lutetium-177-Labeled Prostate-Specific Membrane Antigen in Heavily Pre-Treated Patients

Background: Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) remains a significant contributor to the global cancer burden. lutetium-177-prostate-specific membrane antigen radioligand therapy (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA RLT) is an effective salvage treatment. However, studies have highlighted haematologic toxicity as an adverse event of concern. We report our single-centre experience of compassionate access palliative ¹⁷⁷Lu-DOTAGA-(I-y)fk(Sub-KuE) (¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA I&T) with respect to efficacy and haematologic safety. Methods: Patients with mCRPC and adequate bone marrow/liver function were included. All patients included underwent baseline and response assessment by Gallium-68-PSMA-11 positron emission tomography/computed tomography (⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT). Prescribed activity of therapy was a median 6.24 GBq per patient per cycle (IQR1.29 GBq), administered in 8-week intervals, up to four cycles. Response was assessed by prostate specific antigen (PSA) and a week-12 PET/CT. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 haematologic toxicity, including association with risk factors (age ≥ 70 years, prior/concurrent therapy, presence of metastases, and number of cycles completed), was analysed. Results: One hundred patients completed one cycle of ¹⁷⁷Lu PSMA I&T and underwent response assessment by both PSA and PET/CT. Two patients had an uninterpretable week-12 PET/CT. Median age was 70 (50–89), median number of prior therapies was three (1–6), and median follow up was 12-months. Fifty-four percent achieved a PSA response. Disease control rate (DCR) by PET/CT was 64% (29% SD, 34% PR, and 1% CR). Disease control by PET/CT was associated with an improved one-year overall survival (OS) compared to non-responders, median OS not-reached vs 10-months (p < 0.0001; 95% CI: 0.08–0.44). Regarding haematologic toxicity, 11% experienced a grade ≥ 3 cytopenia (self-limiting). No cases of myelodysplasia/acute leukaemia (MDS/AL) have been recorded. No association with risk factors was demonstrated. Conclusion: ¹⁷⁷Lu-PSMA I&T is a safe and effective palliative outpatient treatment for mCRPC. ⁶⁸Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT response is associated with an improved one-year OS and may be used to adapt therapy.