Insights into Transcriptional Repression of the Homologous Toxin-Antitoxin Cassettes yefM-yoeB and axe-txe

Type II bacterial toxin-antitoxins: hypotheses, facts, and the newfound plethora of the PezAT system

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are entities found in the prokaryotic genomes, with eight reported types. Type II, the best characterized, is comprised of two genes organized as an operon. Whereas toxins impair growth, the cognate antitoxin neutralizes its activity. TAs appeared to be involved in plasmid maintenance, persistence, virulence, and defence against bacteriophages. Most Type II toxins target the bacterial translational machinery. They seem to be antecessors of Higher Eukaryotes and Prokaryotes Nucleotide-binding (HEPN) RNases, minimal nucleotidyltransferase domains, or CRISPR-Cas systems. A total of four TAs encoded by Streptococcus pneumoniae, RelBE, YefMYoeB, Phd-Doc, and HicAB, belong to HEPN-RNases. The fifth is represented by PezAT/Epsilon-Zeta. PezT/Zeta toxins phosphorylate the peptidoglycan precursors, thereby blocking cell wall synthesis. We explore the body of knowledge (facts) and hypotheses procured for Type II TAs and analyse the data accumulated on the PezAT family. Bioinformatics analyses showed that homologues of PezT/Zeta toxin are abundantly distributed among 14 bacterial phyla mostly in Proteobacteria (48%), Firmicutes (27%), and Actinobacteria (18%), showing the widespread distribution of this TA. The pezAT locus was found to be mainly chromosomally encoded whereas its homologue, the tripartite omega-epsilon-zeta locus, was found mostly on plasmids. We found several orphan pezT/zeta toxins, unaccompanied by a cognate antitoxin.

Bacterial Toxin-Antitoxin Systems' Cross-Interactions-Implications for Practical Use in Medicine and Biotechnology

Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are widely present in bacterial genomes. They consist of stable toxins and unstable antitoxins that are classified into distinct groups based on their structure and biological activity. TA systems are mostly related to mobile genetic elements and can be easily acquired through horizontal gene transfer. The ubiquity of different homologous and non-homologous TA systems within a single bacterial genome raises questions about their potential cross-interactions. Unspecific cross-talk between toxins and antitoxins of non-cognate modules may unbalance the ratio of the interacting partners and cause an increase in the free toxin level, which can be deleterious to the cell. Moreover, TA systems can be involved in broadly understood molecular networks as transcriptional regulators of other genes' expression or modulators of cellular mRNA stability. In nature, multiple copies of highly similar or identical TA systems are rather infrequent and probably represent a transition stage during evolution to complete insulation or decay of one of them. Nevertheless, several types of cross-interactions have been described in the literature to date. This implies a question of the possibility and consequences of the TA system cross-interactions, especially in the context of the practical application of the TA-based biotechnological and medical strategies, in which such TAs will be used outside their natural context, will be artificially introduced and induced in the new hosts. Thus, in this review, we discuss the prospective challenges of system cross-talks in the safety and effectiveness of TA system usage.

Minigene as a Novel Regulatory Element in Toxin-Antitoxin Systems

The axe-txe type II toxin-antitoxin (TA) system is characterized by a complex and multilayered mode of gene expression regulation. Precise and tight control of this process is crucial to keep the toxin in an appropriate balance with the cognate antitoxin until its activation is needed for the cell. In this report, we provide evidence that a minigene encoded within the axe-txe operon influences translation of the Txe toxin. This is the first example to date of such a regulatory mechanism identified in the TA modules. Here, in a series of genetic studies, we employed translational reporter gene fusions to establish the molecular basis of this phenomenon. Our results show that translation of the two-codon mini-ORF displays an in cis mode of action, and positively affects the expression of txe, possibly by increasing its mRNA stability through protection from an endonuclease attack. Moreover, we established that the reading frame in which the two cistrons are encoded, as well as the distance between them, are critical parameters that affect the level of such regulation. In addition, by searching for two-codon ORFs we found sequences of several potential minigenes in the leader sequences of several other toxins belonging to the type II TA family. These findings suggest that this type of gene regulation may not only apply for the axe-txe cassette, but could be more widespread among other TA systems.

Interactions of the Streptococcus pneumoniae Toxin-Antitoxin RelBE Proteins with Their Target DNA

Type II bacterial toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are found in most bacteria, archaea, and mobile genetic elements. TAs are usually found as a bi-cistronic operon composed of an unstable antitoxin and a stable toxin that targets crucial cellular functions like DNA supercoiling, cell-wall synthesis or mRNA translation. The type II RelBE system encoded by the pathogen Streptococcus pneumoniae is highly conserved among different strains and participates in biofilm formation and response to oxidative stress. Here, we have analyzed the participation of the RelB antitoxin and the RelB:RelE protein complex in the self-regulation of the pneumococcal relBE operon. RelB acted as a weak repressor, whereas RelE performed the role of a co-repressor. By DNA footprinting experiments, we show that the proteins bind to a region that encompasses two palindromic sequences that are located around the -10 sequences of the single promoter that directs the synthesis of the relBE mRNA. High-resolution footprinting assays showed the distribution of bases whose deoxyriboses are protected by the bound proteins, demonstrating that RelB and RelB:RelE contacted the DNA backbone on one face of the DNA helix and that these interactions extended beyond the palindromic sequences. Our findings suggest that the binding of the RelBE proteins to its DNA target would lead to direct inhibition of the binding of the host RNA polymerase to the relBE promoter.