Targeting the PD-1 Axis with Pembrolizumab for Recurrent or Metastatic Cancer of the Uterine Cervix: A Brief Update

The complement regulatory protein CD46 serves as a novel biomarker for cervical cancer diagnosis and prognosis evaluation

Background

CD46 has been revealed to be a key factor in malignant transformation and cancer treatment. However, the clinical significance of CD46 in cervical cancer remains unclear, and this study aimed to evaluate its role in cervical cancer diagnosis and prognosis evaluation.

Methods

A total of 180 patients with an initial diagnosis of cervical cancer were enrolled at Taizhou Hospital of Zhejiang Province, China. The plasma levels of soluble CD46 (sCD46) and the expression of membrane-bound CD46 (mCD46) were detected by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunohistochemistry (IHC), respectively.

Results

CD46 was found to be significantly upregulated in cervical cancer tissues vs. normal tissues, while no CD46 staining was detected in paired adjacent noncancerous tissues. CD46 staining was more pronounced in cancer cells than in stromal cells in situ (in tissues). Moreover, the plasma levels of sCD46 were able to some extent discriminate between cancer patients and healthy women (AUC=0.6847, 95% CI:0.6152-0.7541). Analysis of Kaplan-Meier survival curves revealed that patients with low CD46 expression had slightly longer overall survival (OS) than patients with high CD46 expression in the tumor microenvironment, but no significant difference. Univariate Cox regression analysis revealed that CD46 (P=0.034) is an independent risk factor for OS in cervical cancer patients.

Conclusion

The present study demonstrated that cervical cancer patients exhibit aberrant expression of CD46, which is closely associated with a poor prognosis, suggesting that CD46 plays a key role in promoting cervical carcinogenesis and that CD46 could serve as a promising potential target for precision therapy for cervical cancer.

Implementation of Comprehensive Genomic Profiling in Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Analysis

Comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) allows for the detection of driver alterations at high resolution, but the limited number of approved targeted therapies and their high costs have contributed to its limited clinical utilization. We retrospectively compared data of 946 women with ovarian cancer (11.4% were referred to CGP, and 88.6% served as control) to examine whether CGP provides a prognosis benefit. Patient baseline parameters were similar between the groups. Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, disease stage at diagnosis, and recurrence status showed statistically significantly longer median overall survival (mOS) in the CGP group versus the control (73.4 versus 54.5 months, p < 0.001). Fifty-four patients (52.9%) had actionable mutations with potential treatments; twenty-six (48.2%) were treated with matched targeted therapy, showing a trend for longer mOS than the eighty-six women in the CGP group who were not given a suggested treatment (105.5 versus 63.6 months, p = 0.066). None of the genomic alterations predicted metastasis location. CCNE1 amplification and KRAS mutations were associated with shorter mOS. Patients with tumor mutation burden ≥4 mutations/megabase had longer mOS. High loss of heterozygosity was associated with longer mOS (99.0 versus 48.2 months, p = 0.004). CGP testing may provide both prognostic and predictive insights for treatment of patients with ovarian cancer. Prospective studies of larger cohorts are warranted.

Immune and inflammation: related factor alterations as biomarkers for predicting prognosis and responsiveness to PD-1 monoclonal antibodies in cervical cancer

PURPOSE

We aimed to elucidate the potential mechanisms of effective responsiveness to PD-1 monoclonal antibody and evaluate more reliable biomarkers to improve the ability to predict the populations of cervical cancer (CC) suitable for immunotherapy.

METHODS

Peripheral blood samples of CC patients undergoing anti-PD-1 therapy were collected before and after treatment. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were analyzed between partial response (PR) and progressive disease (PD) patients. A novel prognostic inflammation and immune-related response gene (IRRG) model was constructed and its prognostic role, correlation with tumor immunity and tumor mutation were evaluated.

RESULTS

DEGs in PR patient after treatment could predict the response to PD-1 monoclonal antibodies. Among PR-specific pathways, tumor immunity, leukocyte migration, and cytokine activities were prominently enriched. Additionally, an IRRG signature comprising CTLA4, AZU1, C5, LAT, CXCL2, GDF7, MPL, PPARG and CELA1 was established and validated to predict the prognosis of CC with great accuracy and specificity. This signature could reflect the tumor microenvironment (TME) and tumor mutational burden (TMB). We also found stimulated adaptive immunity and downregulated inflammation at baseline in patients with sensitive responses to PD-1 monoclonal antibody.

CONCLUSION

We developed an IRRG signature and verified that it was an independent prognostic factor for predicting survival and could reflect a sensitive response to PD-1 monoclonal antibody, which plays a nonnegligible role in the TME of CC. Further investigations are warranted to confirm that patients with stimulated adaptive immunity and downregulated inflammation at baseline could achieve a better survival benefit from PD-1 monoclonal antibody.

The role of DNA damage repair (DDR) system in response to immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy

As our understanding of the mechanisms of cancer treatment has increased, a growing number of studies demonstrate pathways through which DNA damage repair (DDR) affects the immune system. At the same time, the varied response of patients to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy has prompted the discovery of various predictive biomarkers and the study of combination therapy. Here, our investigation explores the interactions involved in combination therapy, accompanied by a review that summarizes currently identified and promising predictors of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) that are useful for classifying oncology patients. In addition, this work, which discusses immunogenicity and several components of the tumor immune microenvironment, serves to illustrate the mechanism by which higher response rates and improved efficacy of DDR inhibitors (DDRi) in combination with ICIs are achieved.

Efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab on cervical cancer: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Background

According to current research, the objective response rate and overall survival of pembrolizumab in the treatment of several types of solid tumors have been significantly improved. Some high-quality clinical trials have studied the effect of applying pembrolizumab in treating cervical cancer. Multiple clinical trials have been conducted, and some of them have shown good results as expected. Therefore, we performed this meta-analysis on existing studies to reveal the efficacy and safety of pembrolizumab in treating cervical cancer.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library and Web of Science were searched for literatures published until October 31, 2021. Outcomes included complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD), disease progression (PD), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), the best time to response (TTR), death rate, adverse events (AE).

Results

A total of 7 studies with 727 patients were included. The results were as follows: CR (0.027, 95%CI: 0.008-0.053), PR (0.104, 95% CI: 0.074-0.145), SD (0.190, 95% CI: 0.149-0.240), PD (0.541, 95% CI: 0.421-0.661). ORR was 0.155 (95% CI: 0.098-0.236) and DCR was 0.331 (95% CI: 0.277-0.385). OS was 10.23 months (95% CI: 8.96-11.50) and PFS was 4.27 months (95% CI: 1.57-6.96). TTR was 2.10 months (95%CI: 1.69-2.51). The 1-year death rate was 0.388 (95% CI: 0.230-0.574). Main adverse events included abnormal liver function, hypothyroidism, neutropenia, anemia, decreased appetite, fatigue, fever, etc. The total incidence of the adverse events of grade 3 and above was 0.212 (95% CI: 0.065-0.509).

Conclusions

Pembrolizumab provides significant benefits in response rate and survival for cervical cancer patients. The results from recent high-quality clinical trials are expected to validate these findings.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021291723.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab for treatment of US patients with persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer

OBJECTIVE

The effectiveness of pembrolizumab for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer has been demonstrated. We aimed to evaluate its cost-effectiveness from the United States (US) healthcare payers perspective.

METHODS

A partitioned survival model over a 30-year lifetime horizon was developed to compare the cost and effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus placebo based on clinical data from the KEYNOTE-826 phase 3 randomized trial. Costs and health state utilities were obtained from literature and publicly available databases. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was measured. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

For the Intention-to-Treat patients, pembrolizumab was associated with an additional 0.74 quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) at an additional cost of $182,271 when compared with placebo. The ICER was $247,663/QALY. For patients with a programmed death-ligand 1 combined positive score ≥ 1 and 10, the ICER was $253,322/QALY and $214,212/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses showed that pembrolizumab had the greatest impact on the ICER. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses showed that the probability of pembrolizumab being cost-effective was zero at the current willingness-to-pay threshold of $150,000/QALY. The price of pembrolizumab had to reduce at least to $28.336 (55.8% of the current price) for it to be cost-effective in a 50% of chance.

CONCLUSION

The addition of pembrolizumab to chemotherapy is costly and might not be cost-effective for persistent, recurrent, or metastatic cervical cancer at the current price in the US.