The Role of CTLA4 and Its Polymorphisms in Solid Organ and Haematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation

Immune Checkpoints in Solid Organ Transplantation

Allogenic graft acceptance is only achieved by life-long immunosuppression, which comes at the cost of significant toxicity. Clinicians face the challenge of adapting the patients' treatments over long periods to lower the risks associated with these toxicities, permanently leveraging the risk of excessive versus insufficient immunosuppression. A major goal and challenge in the field of solid organ transplantation (SOT) is to attain a state of stable immune tolerance specifically towards the grafted organ. The immune system is equipped with a set of inhibitory co-receptors known as immune checkpoints (ICs), which physiologically regulate numerous effector functions. Insufficient regulation through these ICs can lead to autoimmunity and/or immune-mediated toxicity, while excessive expression of ICs induces stable hypo-responsiveness, especially in T cells, a state sometimes referred to as exhaustion. IC blockade has emerged in the last decade as a powerful therapeutic tool against cancer. The opposite action, i.e., subverting IC for the benefit of establishing a state of specific hypo-responsiveness against auto- or allo-antigens, is still in its infancy. In this review, we will summarize the available literature on the role of ICs in SOT and the relevance of ICs with graft acceptance. We will also discuss the possible influence of current immunosuppressive medications on IC functions.

Genetic polymorphisms in TLR3, IL10 and CD209 influence the risk of BK polyomavirus infection after kidney transplantation

Genetic determinants of BK polyomavirus infection after kidney transplantation remain poorly investigated. We assessed the potential impact of 13 different single nucleotide polymorphisms within genes mainly involved in innate immune responses on the risk of BKPyV viremia in 204 KT recipients. After a median follow-up of 1121.5 days, the cumulative incidence of any-level BKPyV viremia was 24.5% (50/204). There was a significant association between the minor T allele of TLR3 (rs3775291) SNP and the development of BKPyV viremia (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 2.16; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.08–4.30; P value = 0.029), whereas the minor G allele of CD209 (rs4804803) SNP exerted a protective role (aHR: 0.54; 95% CI: 0.29–1.00; P value = 0.050). A higher incidence of BKPyV viremia was also observed for the minor G allele of IL10 (rs1800872) SNP, although the absence of BKPyV events among homozygotes for the reference allele prevented multivariable analysis. The BKPyV viremia-free survival rate decreased with the increasing number of unfavorable genotypes (100% [no unfavorable genotypes], 85.4% [1 genotype], 70.9% [2 genotypes], 52.5% [3 genotypes]; P value = 0.008). In conclusion, SNPs in TLR3, CD209 and IL10 genes play a role in modulating the susceptibility to any-level BKPyV viremia among KT recipients.

Tools for optimizing risk assessment in hematopoietic cell transplant - What can we get away with?

Unrelated allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) is a critical modality to treat hematologic malignancies. The current objective of donor selection is to match donor and recipient at the HLA (human leukocyte antigen) peptide-binding region which should lower the risk of graft-versus-host disease. However, depending on the patient's ethnicity/race, finding a matched donor is challenging, especially for HLA-DPB1 which is due to the weak linkage disequilibrium between HLA-DPB1 and the other HLA class II loci. Recent evidence, on the molecular level, has shown that certain HLA mismatches carry lower clinical risk. More specifically, there is an increasing understanding of polymorphisms of the innate and adaptive immune systems and their impact on transplant outcomes, allowing us to expand our "toolkit" for optimization of donor selection in HCT. Therefore, in this review we discuss matching strategies based on comparing donor and recipient polymorphisms that may influence innate and adaptive immune response genes in allorecognition and the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in non-HLA genes that have the potential for providing additional tools to refine risk stratification.