Expression of Musashi-1 Increases in Bone Healing

Recent Progress in the Research on RNA-Binding Proteins in Bone Development and Diseases

RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), which regulate gene expression through post-transcriptional modifications of RNAs, play a role in diverse biological processes that include bone cell development and bone tissue formation. RBP dysregulation may result in aberrant bone homeostasis and contribute to various bone diseases. The function of RBPs in bone physiology and pathophysiology and the underlying molecular mechanisms have been extensively studied in recent years. This article provides a review of such studies, highlighting the potential of RBPs as pivotal targets for therapeutic intervention.

Effect of RNA-binding proteins on osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells

Tissue regeneration mediated by mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) is an ideal way to repair bone defects. RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) can affect cell function through post-transcriptional regulation. Exploring the role of RBPs in the process of osteogenic differentiation of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) is helpful to find a key method to promote the osteogenic efficiency of BMSCs. By reviewing the literature, we obtained a differentially expressed mRNA dataset during the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs and a human RBP dataset. A total of 82 differentially expressed RBPs in the osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs were screened by intersection of the two datasets. Functional analysis showed that the differentially expressed RBPs were mainly involved in RNA transcription, translation and degradation through the formation of spliceosomes and ribonucleoprotein complexes. The top 15 RBPs determined by degree score were FBL, NOP58, DDX10, RPL9, SNRPD3, NCL, IFIH1, RPL18A, NAT10, EXOSC5, ALYREF, PA2G4, EIF5B, SNRPD1 and EIF6. The results of this study demonstrate that the expression of many RBPs changed during osteogenic differentiation of BMSCs.

Maxillary sinus floor augmentation comparing bovine versus porcine bone xenografts mixed with autogenous bone graft. A split-mouth randomized controlled trial

Aim

To compare the effectiveness of two xenografts for maxillary sinus floor augmentation in terms of clinical, radiographical, histologic, and molecular outcomes.

Materials and methods

A split‐mouth randomized clinical trial was conducted at the University of Granada. Ten consecutive patients in need of bilateral two‐staged maxillary sinus floor augmentation were included. Each patient received both biomaterials (porcine bone mineral and anorganic bovine bone), which were randomly assigned for bilateral sinus augmentation. The maxillary autogenous bone scraped from the sinus access window was mixed with each xenograft at a 20:80 ratio. After a healing period of 6 months, bone biopsies were collected with a trephine during the implant placement in the regenerated area. Histologic, histomorphometrical, immunohistochemical, and molecular outcomes were analyzed. Clinical and radiographical data throughout the treatment phases were also evaluated.

Results

The resulting anatomic features were similar between both groups. After six months of graft consolidation, the graft resorption rates were similar between both biomaterials. The histologic, histomorphometrical, and immunohistochemical results showed no statistical differences between groups.

Conclusion

Anorganic bovine bone and porcine bone mineral combined with maxillary autogenous cortical bone show similar biologic and radiologic features in terms of biomaterial resorption, osteoconduction, and osteogenesis when used for maxillary sinus floor augmentation.