Effects of a Unique Combination of the Whole-Body Low Dose Radiotherapy with Inactivation of Two Immune Checkpoints and/or a Heat Shock Protein on the Transplantable Lung Cancer in Mice

NOTCH3 as a prognostic biomarker and its correlation with immune infiltration in gastrointestinal cancers

NOTCH receptor 3 (NOTCH3) is known to regulate the transcription of oncogenes or tumor suppressor genes, thereby playing a crucial role in tumor development, invasion, maintenance, and chemotherapy resistance. However, the specific mechanism of how NOTCH3 drives immune infiltration in gastrointestinal cancer remains uncertain. The expression of NOTCH3 was analyzed through Western blot, PCR, Oncomine database, and the Tumor Immune Estimation Resource (TIMER) site. Kaplan-Meier plotter, PrognoScan database, and gene expression profile interactive analysis (GEPIA) were used to assess the impact of NOTCH3 on clinical prognosis. The correlation between NOTCH3 expression and immune infiltration gene markers was investigated using TIMER and GEPIA. NOTCH3 was found to be commonly overexpressed in various types of gastrointestinal tumors and was significantly associated with poor prognosis. Furthermore, the expression level of NOTCH3 showed a significant correlation with the tumor purity of gastrointestinal tumors and the extent of immune infiltration by different immune cells. Our findings suggest that NOTCH3 may act as a crucial regulator of tumor immune cell infiltration and can serve as a valuable prognostic biomarker in gastrointestinal cancers.

Combination therapy involving HSP90 inhibitors for combating cancer: an overview of clinical and preclinical progress

The molecular chaperone heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) regulates multiple crucial signalling pathways in cancer by driving the maturation of key signalling components, thereby playing a crucial role in tumorigenesis and drug resistance in cancer. Inhibition of HSP90 results in metastable conformational collapse of its client proteins and their proteasomal degradation. Considerable efforts have been devoted to the development of small-molecule inhibitors targeting HSP90, and more than 20 inhibitors have been evaluated in clinical trials for cancer therapy. However, owing to disadvantages such as organ toxicity and drug resistance, only one HSP90 inhibitor has been approved for use in clinical settings. In recent years, HSP90 inhibitors used in combination with other anti-cancer therapies have shown remarkable potential in the treatment of cancer. HSP90 inhibitors work synergistically with various anti-cancer therapies, including chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiation therapy and immunotherapy. HSP90 inhibitors can improve the pharmacological effects of the above-mentioned therapies and reduce treatment resistance. This review provides an overview of the use of combination therapy with HSP90 inhibitors and other anti-cancer therapies in clinical and preclinical studies reported in the past decade and summarises design strategies and prospects for these combination therapies. Altogether, this review provides a theoretical basis for further research and application of these combination therapies in the treatment of cancer.

Tumor-associated macrophages affect the treatment of lung cancer

As one of the most common malignant tumors in the world, lung cancer has limited benefits for patients despite its diverse treatment methods due to factors such as personalized medicine targeting histological type, immune checkpoint expression, and driver gene mutations. The high mortality rate of lung cancer is partly due to the immune-suppressive which limits the effectiveness of anti-cancer drugs and induces tumor cell resistance. The currently widely recognized TAM phenotypes include the anti-tumor M1 and pro-tumor M2 phenotypes. M2 macrophages promote the formation of an immune-suppressive microenvironment and hinder immune cell infiltration, thereby inhibiting activation of the anti-tumor immune system and aiding tumor cells in resisting treatment. Analyzing the relationship between different treatment methods and macrophages in the TME can help us better understand the impact of TAMs on lung cancer and confirm the feasibility of targeted TAM therapy. Targeting TAMs to reduce the M2/M1 ratio and reverse the immune-suppressive microenvironment can improve the clinical efficacy of conventional treatment methods and potentially open up more efficient combination treatment strategies, maximizing the benefit for lung cancer patients.

HSP90: A promising target for NSCLC treatments

The emergence of targeted therapies and immunotherapies has improved the overall survival of patients with nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the 5-year survival rate remains low. New drugs are needed to overcome this dilemma. Moreover, the significant correlation between various client proteins of heat-shock protein (HSP) 90 and tumor occurrence, progression, and drug resistance suggests that HSP90 is a potential therapeutic target for NSCLC. However, the outcomes of clinical trials for HSP90 inhibitors have been disappointing, indicating significant toxicity of these drugs and that further screening of the beneficiary population is required. NSCLC patients with oncogenic-driven gene mutations or those at advanced stages who are resistant to multi-line treatments may benefit from HSP90 inhibitors. Enhancing the therapeutic efficacy and reducing the toxicity of HSP90 inhibitors can be achieved via the optimization of their drug structure, using them in combination therapies with low-dose HSP90 inhibitors and other drugs, and via targeted administration to tumor lesions. Here, we provide a review of the recent research on the role of HSP90 in NSCLC and summarize relevant studies of HSP90 inhibitors in NSCLC.

Emerging roles of PHLPP phosphatases in lung cancer

Pleckstrin homologous domain leucine-rich repeating protein phosphatases (PHLPPs) were originally identified as protein kinase B (Akt) kinase hydrophobic motif specific phosphatases to maintain the cellular homeostasis. With the continuous expansion of PHLPPs research, imbalanced-PHLPPs were mainly found as a tumor suppressor gene of a variety of solid tumors. In this review, we simply described the history and structures of PHLPPs and summarized the recent achievements in emerging roles of PHLPPs in lung cancer by 1) the signaling pathways affected by PHLPPs including Phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT, RAS/RAF/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK)/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) and Protein kinase C (PKC) signaling cascades. 2) function of PHLPPs regulatory factor USP46 and miR-190/miR-215, 3) the potential roles of PHLPPs in disease prognosis, Epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR)- tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) resistance and DNA damage, 4) and the possible function of PHLPPs in radiotherapy, ferroptosis and inflammation response. Therefore, PHLPPs can be considered as either biomarker or prognostic marker for lung cancer treatment.

Immune modulation during anti-cancer radio(immuno)therapy

Cancer can affect all human organs and tissues and ranks as a prominent cause of death as well as an obstruction to increasing life expectancy. A notable breakthrough in oncology has been the inclusion of the immune system in fighting cancer, potentially prolonging life and providing long-term benefits. The concept of "immunotherapy" has been discussed from the 19th and early 20th centuries by Wilhelm Busch, William B. Coley and Paul Ehrlich. This involves distinct approaches, including vaccines, non-specific cytokines and adoptive cell therapies. However, despite the advances made in recent years, questions on how to select the best therapeutic options or how to select the best combinations to improve clinical outcomes are still relevant for scientists and clinicians. More than half of cancer patients receive radiotherapy (RT) as part of their treatment. With the advances in RT and immunotherapy approaches, it is reasonable to consider how to enhance immunotherapy with radiation and vice versa, and to investigate whether combinations of these therapies would be beneficial. In this chapter, we will discuss how the immune system responds to cancer cells and different cancer therapies with a focus on combination of RT and immunotherapy (radioimmunotherapy, RIT).

Exploring low-dose radiotherapy to overcome radio-immunotherapy resistance

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the current treatment landscape for cancer, yet the response rates of ICIs remain unmet. Synergistic with immunotherapy, low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) has been demonstrated to activate anti-tumor immunity - a transition from traditional radiation therapy geared toward local radical treatment to a type of immunological adjuvant. As such, studies utilizing LDRT to enhance the efficacy of immunotherapy have been increasing preclinically and clinically. This paper reviews the recent strategies of using LDRT to overcome the resistance of ICIs, as well as providing potential opportunities in cancer treatment. Despite the potential of LDRT in immunotherapy is recognized, the mechanisms behind this form of treatment remain largely elusive. Thus, we reviewed history, mechanisms and challenges associated with this form of treatment, as well as different modes of its application, to provide relatively accurate practice standards for LDRT as a sensitizing treatment when combined with immunotherapy or radio-immunotherapy.

Application of individualized multimodal radiotherapy combined with immunotherapy in metastatic tumors

Radiotherapy is one of the mainstays of cancer treatment. More than half of cancer patients receive radiation therapy. In addition to the well-known direct tumoricidal effect, radiotherapy has immunomodulatory properties. When combined with immunotherapy, radiotherapy, especially high-dose radiotherapy (HDRT), exert superior systemic effects on distal and unirradiated tumors, which is called abscopal effect. However, these effects are not always effective for cancer patients. Therefore, many studies have focused on exploring the optimized radiotherapy regimens to further enhance the antitumor immunity of HDRT and reduce its immunosuppressive effect. Several studies have shown that low-dose radiotherapy (LDRT) can effectively reprogram the tumor microenvironment, thereby potentially overcoming the immunosuppressive stroma induced by HDRT. However, bridging the gap between preclinical commitment and effective clinical delivery is challenging. In this review, we summarized the existing studies supporting the combined use of HDRT and LDRT to synergistically enhance antitumor immunity, and provided ideas for the individualized clinical application of multimodal radiotherapy (HDRT+LDRT) combined with immunotherapy.

Can Low-Level Ionizing Radiation Do Us Any Harm?

The current system of radiological protection relies on the linear no-threshold (LNT) hypothesis of cancer risk due to humans being exposed to ionizing radiation (IR). Under this tenet, effects of low doses (i.e. of those not exceeding 100 mGy or 0.1 mGy/min. of X- or γ-rays for acute and chronic exposures, respectively) are evaluated by downward linear extrapolation from regions of higher doses and dose rates where harmful effects are actually observed. However, evidence accumulated over many years clearly indicates that exposure of humans to low doses of radiation does not cause any harm and often promotes health. In this review, we discuss results of some epidemiological analyses, clinical trials and controlled experimental animal studies. Epidemiological data indicate the presence of a threshold and departure from linearity at the lowest dose ranges. Experimental studies clearly demonstrate the qualitative difference between biological mechanisms and effects at low and at higher doses of IR. We also discuss the genesis and the likely reasons for the persistence of the LNT tenet, despite its scientific implausibility and deleterious social consequences. It is high time to replace the LNT paradigm by a scientifically based dose-effect relationship where realistic quantitative hormetic or threshold models are exploited.