Activity of Oritavancin and Its Synergy with Other Antibiotics against Mycobacterium abscessus Infection In Vitro and In Vivo

Antimicrobial susceptibility of Mycobacterium abscessus and treatment of pulmonary and extra-pulmonary infections

BACKGROUND

Mycobacterium abscessus (MAB) is the mycobacterial species least susceptible to antimicrobials. Infections are difficult to treat, and cure rates are below 50% even after a combination of 4-5 drugs for many months.

OBJECTIVES

To examine antimicrobial susceptibilities and treatment recommendations in light of what is known about mechanisms of resistance and pharmacodynamics/pharmacokinetics (PK/PD) interactions.

SOURCES

Original papers on the topics of 'antimicrobials', 'susceptibility', 'treatment', and 'outcome' from 2019 onwards, in the context of the evidence brought by the guidelines published in 2020 for pulmonary infections.

CONTENT

MAB is susceptible in vitro to only a few antimicrobials. Breakpoints were set by the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and are revised by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing for epidemiological cut-off values. Innate resistance is due to multiple resistance mechanisms involving efflux pumps, inactivating enzymes, and low drug-target affinity. In addition, MAB may display acquired resistance to macrolides and amikacin through mutations in drug binding sites. Treatment outcomes are better for macrolide-based combinations and MAB subspecies massiliense. New compounds in the family of cyclines, oxazolidinones, and penem-β-lactamase inhibitor combinations (described in another paper), as well as bedaquiline, a new antituberculous agent, are promising, but their efficacy remains to be proven. PK/PD studies, which are critical for establishing optimal dosing regimens, were mainly done for monotherapy and healthy individuals.

IMPLICATIONS

Medical evidence is poor, and randomized clinical trials or standardized cohorts are needed to compare outcomes of patients with similar underlying disease, clinical characteristics, and identified MAB subspecies/sequevar. Microbiological diagnosis and susceptibility testing need to be harmonized to enable the comparison of agents and the testing of new compounds. Testing antimicrobial combinations requires new methods, especially for PK/PD parameters. Molecular testing may help in assessing MAB resistance prior to treatment. New antimicrobials need to be systematically tested against MAB to find an effective antimicrobial regimen.

Drugs for treating infections caused by non-tubercular mycobacteria: a narrative review from the study group on mycobacteria of the Italian Society of Infectious Diseases and Tropical Medicine

BACKGROUND

Non-tuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) are generally free-living organism, widely distributed in the environment, with sporadic potential to infect. In recent years, there has been a significant increase in the global incidence of NTM-related disease, spanning across all continents and an increased mortality after the diagnosis has been reported. The decisions on whether to treat or not and which drugs to use are complex and require a multidisciplinary approach as well as patients' involvement in the decision process.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This review aims at describing the drugs used for treating NTM-associated diseases emphasizing the efficacy, tolerability, optimization strategies as well as possible drugs that might be used in case of intolerance or resistance. We also reviewed data on newer compounds highlighting the lack of randomised clinical trials for many drugs but also encouraging preliminary data for others. We also focused on non-pharmacological interventions that need to be adopted during care of individuals with NTM-associated diseases CONCLUSIONS: Despite insufficient efficacy and poor tolerability this review emphasizes the improvement in patients' care and the needs for future studies in the field of anti-NTM treatments.

Repurposing miconazole and tamoxifen for the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus complex infections through in silico chemogenomics approach

Drug repositioning is an alternative to overcome the complexity of the drug discovery and approval procedures for the treatment of Mycobacterium abscessus Complex (MABSC) infections that are increasing globally due to the emergency of antimicrobial resistance mechanisms. Here, an in silico chemogenomics approach was performed to compare the sequences from 4942 M. abscessus subsp. abscessus (M. abscessus) proteins with 5258 or 3473 therapeutic targets registered in the DrugBank or Therapeutic Target Database, respectively. This comparison identified 446 drugs or drug candidates whose targets were homologous to M. abscessus proteins. These identified drugs were considered potential inhibitors of MABSC (anti-MABSC activity). Further screening and inspection resulted in the selection of ezetimibe, furosemide, itraconazole, miconazole (MCZ), tamoxifen (TAM), and thiabendazole (THI) for experimental validation. Among them, MCZ and TAM showed minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC) of 32 and 24 µg mL-1 against M. abscessus, respectively. For M. bolletii and M. massiliense strains, MCZ and TAM showed MICs of 16 and 24 µg mL-1, in this order. Subsequently, the antibacterial activity of MCZ was confirmed in vivo, indicating its potential to reduce the bacterial load in the lungs of infected mice. These results show that MCZ and TAM can serve as molecular scaffolds for the prospective hit-2-lead optimization of new analogs with greater potency, selectivity, and permeability.