Treatment of Cancer with Radio-Immunotherapy: What We Currently Know and What the Future May Hold

Identification of RP11-770J1.4 as immune-related lncRNA regulating the CTXN1-cGAS-STING axis in histologically lower-grade glioma

Human gliomas are lethal brain cancers. Emerging evidence revealed the regulatory role of long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in tumors. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of the expression profiles of RNAs in histologically lower-grade glioma (LGG). Enrichment analysis revealed that glioma is influenced by immune-related signatures. Survival analysis further established the close correlation between network features and glioma prognosis. Subsequent experiments showed lncRNA RP11-770J1.4 regulates CTXN1 expression through hsa-miR-124-3p. Correlation analysis identified lncRNA RP11-770J1.4 was immune related, specifically involved in the cytosolic DNA sensing pathway. Downregulated lncRNA RP11-770J1.4 resulted in increased spontaneous gene expression of the cGAS-STING pathway. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis, along with investigations in a glioblastoma stem cell model and patient sample analysis, demonstrated the predominant localization of CTXN1 within tumor cores rather than peripheral regions. Immunohistochemistry staining established a negative correlation between CTXN1 expression and infiltration of CD8+ T cells. In vivo, Ctxn1 knockdown in GL261 cells led to decreased tumor burden and improved survival while increasing infiltration of CD8+ T cells. These findings unveil novel insights into the lncRNA RP11-770J1.4-CTXN1 as a potential immune regulatory axis, highlighting its therapeutic implications for histologically LGGs.

Neoadjuvant chemoradiation therapy combined with immunotherapy for microsatellite stable ultra-low rectal cancer (CHOICE II): study protocol of a multicentre prospective randomised clinical trial

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) could bring tumour shrinking and downstaging and increase the probability of organ preservation for patients with low rectal cancer. But for ultra-low rectal cancer, there is little possibility for organ preservation. Immunotherapy has been shown to have significant survival benefits in microsatellite instability-high patients but poor response in microsatellite stable (MSS) patients. Studies have demonstrated that radiotherapy and immunotherapy have synergistic effects in cancer treatment. There is no existing evidence about the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy combined with nCRT for patients with MSS ultra-low rectal cancer.

METHOD AND ANALYSIS

This trial is an open-labelled multicentre prospective randomised controlled trial (NCT05215379) with two parallel groups and allocation ratio 1:1 (nCRT+immunotherapy vs nCRT group). Eligible participants will be aged 18-75 years, with a desire for anus preservation, confirmed cT1-3aN0-1M0 rectal adenocarcinoma, confirmed MSS type, inferior margin of ≤5 cm from the anal verge. The primary endpoint of this trial is complete clinical response (cCR) rate. Immunotherapy is added after 1 week of chemoradiotherapy for two cycles, and then the patients will be administered two cycles of immunotherapy and CAPOX. The evaluations will be carried out after the completion of the whole neoadjuvant therapy. We expect the programme to improve the cCR rate and the quality of life for patients with ultra-low rectal cancer.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This trial was approved by the Ethics committee of Changhai Hospital and other medical centres (Grant number:CHEC2022-118). The results of this study will provide further insight into the clinical efficacy of immunotherapy in combination with nCRT in patients with MSS ultra-low rectal cancer.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05215379.

Ibero-American Consensus Review and Incorporation of New Biomarkers for Clinical Practice in Colorectal Cancer

Advances in genomic technologies have significantly improved the management of colorectal cancer (CRC). Several biomarkers have been identified in CRC that enable personalization in the use of biologic agents that have shown to enhance the clinical outcomes of patients. However, technologies used for their determination generate massive amounts of information that can be difficult for the clinician to interpret and use adequately. Through several discussion meetings, a group of oncology experts from Spain and several Latin American countries reviewed the latest literature to provide practical recommendations on the determination of biomarkers in CRC based on their clinical experience. The article also describes the importance of looking for additional prognostic biomarkers and the use of histopathology to establish an adequate molecular classification. Present and future of immunotherapy biomarkers in CRC patients are also discussed, together with several techniques for marker determination, including liquid biopsy, next-generation sequencing (NGS), polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and fecal immunohistochemical tests. Finally, the role of Molecular Tumor Boards in the diagnosis and treatment of CRC is described. All of this information will allow us to highlight the importance of biomarker determination in CRC.

Immune modulation during anti-cancer radio(immuno)therapy

Cancer can affect all human organs and tissues and ranks as a prominent cause of death as well as an obstruction to increasing life expectancy. A notable breakthrough in oncology has been the inclusion of the immune system in fighting cancer, potentially prolonging life and providing long-term benefits. The concept of "immunotherapy" has been discussed from the 19th and early 20th centuries by Wilhelm Busch, William B. Coley and Paul Ehrlich. This involves distinct approaches, including vaccines, non-specific cytokines and adoptive cell therapies. However, despite the advances made in recent years, questions on how to select the best therapeutic options or how to select the best combinations to improve clinical outcomes are still relevant for scientists and clinicians. More than half of cancer patients receive radiotherapy (RT) as part of their treatment. With the advances in RT and immunotherapy approaches, it is reasonable to consider how to enhance immunotherapy with radiation and vice versa, and to investigate whether combinations of these therapies would be beneficial. In this chapter, we will discuss how the immune system responds to cancer cells and different cancer therapies with a focus on combination of RT and immunotherapy (radioimmunotherapy, RIT).

Immunotherapy and Radiotherapy as an Antitumoral Long-Range Weapon-A Partnership with Unsolved Challenges: Dose, Fractionation, Volumes, Therapeutic Sequence

Immunotherapy, the modern oncological treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), has been part of the clinical practice for malignant melanoma for more than a decade. Anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4 (CTLA4), anti-programmed cell death Protein 1 (PD-1), or anti programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) agents are currently part of the therapeutic arsenal of metastatic or relapsed disease in numerous cancers; more recently, they have also been evaluated and validated as consolidation therapy in the advanced local stage. The combination with radiotherapy, a treatment historically considered loco-regional, changes the paradigm, offering-via synergistic effects-the potential to increase immune-mediated tumor destruction. However, the fragile balance between the tumoricidal effects through immune mechanisms and the immunosuppression induced by radiotherapy means that, in the absence of ICI, the immune-mediated potentiation effect of radiotherapy at a distance from the site of administration is rare. Through analysis of the preclinical and clinical data, especially the evidence from the PACIFIC clinical trial, we can consider that hypofractionated irradiation and reduction of the irradiated volume, in order to protect the immune-infiltrated tumor microenvironment, performed concurrently with the immunotherapy or a maximum of 2 weeks before the start of ICI treatment, could bring maximum benefits. In addition, avoiding radiation-induced lymphopenia (RILD) by protecting some anatomical lymphoid structures or large blood vessels, as well as the use of irradiation of partial tumor volumes, even in plurimetastatic disease, for the conversion of a "cold" immunological tumor into a "hot" immunological tumor are modern concepts of radiotherapy in the era of immunotherapy. Low-dose radiotherapy could also be proposed in plurimetastatic cases, the effect being different (modeling of the TME) from that of high doses per fraction irradiation (cell death with release of antigens that facilitates immune-mediated cell death).

Combined radio-immunotherapy: An opportunity to increase the therapeutic ratio of oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy

The utility of radiotherapy as a means of palliating symptoms due to metastatic cancer is well-accepted. A growing body of literature suggests that radiotherapy may play a role beyond palliation in some patients with low-burden metastatic disease. Recent data suggest that oligometastasis-directed radiotherapy may improve progression-free and even overall survival in select patients. Immunotherapy also has a growing role in the management of patients with metastatic cancer and, like radiotherapy, appears to be most effective in the setting of low-volume disease. Thus, the addition of immunotherapy may be a feasible means of increasing the therapeutic ratio of metastasis-directed radiotherapy, particularly among patients with oligometastatic cancer.