Discrimination between 34 of 36 Possible Combinations of Three C>T SNP Genotypes in the MGMT Promoter by High Resolution Melting Analysis Coupled with Pyrosequencing Using A Single Primer Set

Temperature-Wise Calibration Increases the Accuracy of DNA Methylation Levels Determined by High-Resolution Melting (HRM)

High-resolution melting (HRM) is a cost-efficient tool for targeted DNA methylation analysis. HRM yields the average methylation status across all CpGs in PCR products. Moreover, it provides information on the methylation pattern, e.g., the occurrence of monoallelic methylation. HRM assays have to be calibrated by analyzing DNA methylation standards of known methylation status and mixtures thereof. In general, DNA methylation levels determined by the classical calibration approach, including the whole temperature range in between normalization intervals, are in good agreement with the mean of the DNA methylation status of individual CpGs determined by pyrosequencing (PSQ), the gold standard of targeted DNA methylation analysis. However, the classical calibration approach leads to highly inaccurate results for samples with heterogeneous DNA methylation since they result in more complex melt curves, differing in their shape compared to those of DNA standards and mixtures thereof. Here, we present a novel calibration approach, i.e., temperature-wise calibration. By temperature-wise calibration, methylation profiles over temperature are obtained, which help in finding the optimal calibration range and thus increase the accuracy of HRM data, particularly for heterogeneous DNA methylation. For explaining the principle and demonstrating the potential of the novel calibration approach, we selected the promoter and two enhancers of MGMT, a gene encoding the repair protein MGMT.

Association of MGMT Promoter and Enhancer Methylation with Genetic Variants, Clinical Parameters, and Demographic Characteristics in Glioblastoma

The response of glioblastoma (GBM) patients to the alkylating agent temozolomide (TMZ) vitally depends on the expression level of the repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT). Since MGMT is strongly regulated by promoter methylation, the methylation status of the MGMT promoter has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for GBM patients. By determining the methylation levels of the four enhancers located within or close to the MGMT gene, we recently found that enhancer methylation contributes to MGMT regulation. In this study, we investigated if methylation of the four enhancers is associated with SNP rs16906252, TERT promoter mutations C228T and C250T, TERT SNP rs2853669, proliferation index Ki-67, overall survival (OS), age, and sex of the patients. In general, associations with genetic variants, clinical parameters, and demographic characteristics were caused by a complex interplay of multiple CpGs in the MGMT promoter and of multiple CpGs in enhancer regions. The observed associations for intragenic enhancer 4, located in intron 2 of MGMT, differed from associations observed for the three intergenic enhancers. Some findings were restricted to subgroups of samples with either methylated or unmethylated MGMT promoters, underpinning the relevance of the MGMT promoter status in GBMs.

Association between MGMT Enhancer Methylation and MGMT Promoter Methylation, MGMT Protein Expression, and Overall Survival in Glioblastoma

The repair protein O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) is regulated epigenetically, mainly by the methylation of the MGMT promoter. MGMT promoter methylation status has emerged as a prognostic and predictive biomarker for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM). However, a strong negative correlation between MGMT promoter methylation and MGMT protein expression cannot be applied as a rule for all GBM patients. In order to investigate if the DNA methylation status of MGMT enhancers is associated with MGMT promoter methylation, MGMT expression, and the overall survival (OS) of GBM patients, we established assays based on high-resolution melting analysis and pyrosequencing for one intragenic and three intergenic MGMT enhancers. For CpGs in an enhancer located 560 kb upstream of the MGMT promoter, we found a significant negative correlation between the methylation status and MGMT protein levels of GBM samples expressing MGMT. The methylation status of CpGs in the intragenic enhancer (hs696) was strongly negatively correlated with MGMT promoter methylation and was significantly higher in MGMT-expressing GBM samples than in MGMT-non-expressing GBM samples. Moreover, low methylation of CpGs 01-03 and CpGs 09-13 was associated with the longer OS of the GBM patients. Our findings indicate an association between MGMT enhancer methylation and MGMT promoter methylation, MGMT protein expression, and/or OS.