1
|
Douradinha B. Exploring the journey: A comprehensive review of vaccine development against Klebsiella pneumoniae. Microbiol Res 2024; 287:127837. [PMID: 39059097 DOI: 10.1016/j.micres.2024.127837] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2024] [Revised: 06/09/2024] [Accepted: 07/13/2024] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Klebsiella pneumoniae, a prominent nosocomial pathogen, poses a critical global health threat due to its multidrug-resistant (MDR) and hypervirulent strains. This comprehensive review focuses into the complex approaches undertaken in the development of vaccines against K. pneumoniae. Traditional methods, such as whole-cell and ribosomal-based vaccines, are compared with modern strategies, including DNA and mRNA vaccines, and extracellular vesicles (EVs), among others. Each method presents unique advantages and challenges, emphasising the complexity of developing an effective vaccine against this pathogen. Significant advancements in computational tools and artificial intelligence (AI) have revolutionised antigen identification and vaccine design, enhancing the precision and efficiency of developing multiepitope-based vaccines. The review also highlights the potential of glycomics and immunoinformatics in identifying key antigenic components and elucidating immune evasion mechanisms employed by K. pneumoniae. Despite progress, challenges remain in ensuring the safety, efficacy, and manufacturability of these vaccines. Notably, EVs demonstrate promise due to their intrinsic adjuvant properties and ability to elicit robust immune responses, although concerns regarding inflammation and antigen variability persist. This review provides a critical overview of the current landscape of K. pneumoniae vaccine development, stressing the need for continued innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration to address this pressing public health issue. The integration of advanced computational methods and AI holds the potential to accelerate the development of effective immunotherapies, paving the way for novel vaccines against MDR K. pneumoniae.
Collapse
|
2
|
Pampalone M, Cuscino N, Iannolo G, Amico G, Ricordi C, Vitale G, Carcione C, Castelbuono S, Scilabra SD, Coronnello C, Gruttadauria S, Pietrosi G. Human Amniotic MSC Response in LPS-Stimulated Ascites from Patients with Cirrhosis: FOXO1 Gene and Th17 Activation in Enhanced Antibacterial Activation. Int J Mol Sci 2024; 25:2801. [PMID: 38474048 DOI: 10.3390/ijms25052801] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2024] [Revised: 02/22/2024] [Accepted: 02/23/2024] [Indexed: 03/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is a severe complication in patients with decompensated liver cirrhosis and is commonly treated with broad spectrum antibiotics. However, the rise of antibiotic resistance requires alternative therapeutic strategies. As recently shown, human amnion-derived mesenchymal stem cells (hA-MSCs) are able, in vitro, to promote bacterial clearance and modulate the immune and inflammatory response in SBP. Our results highlight the upregulation of FOXO1, CXCL5, CXCL6, CCL20, and MAPK13 in hA-MSCs as well as the promotion of bacterial clearance, prompting a shift in the immune response toward a Th17 lymphocyte phenotype after 72 h treatment. In this study, we used an in vitro SBP model and employed omics techniques (next-generation sequencing) to investigate the mechanisms by which hA-MSCs modify the crosstalk between immune cells in LPS-stimulated ascitic fluid. We also validated the data obtained via qRT-PCR, cytofluorimetric analysis, and Luminex assay. These findings provide further support to the hope of using hA-MSCs for the prevention and treatment of infective diseases, such as SBP, offering a viable alternative to antibiotic therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariangela Pampalone
- Ri.MED Foundation, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Nicola Cuscino
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Gioacchin Iannolo
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Giandomenico Amico
- Ri.MED Foundation, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Camillo Ricordi
- Cell Transplant Center, Diabetes Research Institute (DRI), University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, 1450 NW 10th Ave, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | | | | | - Salvatore Castelbuono
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | - Simone Dario Scilabra
- Ri.MED Foundation, 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Advanced Biotechnologies, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| | | | - Salvatore Gruttadauria
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Disease and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), UPMCI (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy), 90127 Palermo, Italy
- Department of General Surgery and Medical-Surgical Specialties, University of Catania, 95124 Catania, Italy
| | - Giada Pietrosi
- Department for the Treatment and Study of Abdominal Disease and Abdominal Transplantation, IRCCS ISMETT (Istituto Mediterraneo per i Trapianti e Terapie ad Alta Specializzazione), UPMCI (University of Pittsburgh Medical Center Italy), 90127 Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis in Decompensated Liver Cirrhosis—A Literature Review. LIVERS 2022. [DOI: 10.3390/livers2030018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis (SBP) is defined as a bacterial infection of the ascitic fluid without a surgically treatable intra-abdominal infection source. SBP is a common, severe complication in cirrhosis patients with ascites, and if left untreated, in-hospital mortality may exceed 90%. However, the incidence of SBP has been lowered to approx. 20% through early diagnosis and antibiotic therapy. Clinical awareness, prompt diagnosis, and immediate treatment are advised when caring for these patients to reduce mortality and morbidity. Aim: To discuss important issues comprising types of SBP, pathogenesis, bacteriology, including the emergence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) microorganisms, prompt diagnosis, risk factors, prognosis, treatment strategies, as well as recurrence prevention through antibiotic prophylaxis until liver transplantation and future trends in treating and preventing SBP in detail. Methods: This article is a literature review and appraisal of guidelines, randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and other review articles found on PubMed from between 1977 and 2022. Results: There are three types of SBP. Bacterial translocation from GI tract is the most common source of SBP. Therefore, two thirds of SBP cases were caused by Gram-negative bacilli, of which Escherichia coli is the most frequently isolated pathogen. However, a trend of Gram-positive cocci associated SBP has been demonstrated in recent years, possibly related to more invasive procedures and long-term quinolone prophylaxis. A diagnostic paracentesis should be performed in all patients with cirrhosis and ascites who require emergency room care or hospitalization, who demonstrate or report consistent signs/symptoms in order to confirm evidence of SBP. Distinguishing SBP from secondary bacterial peritonitis is essential because the conditions require different therapeutic strategies. The standard treatment for SBP is prompt broad-spectrum antibiotic administration and should be tailored according to community-acquired SBP, healthcare-associated or nosocomial SBP infections and local resistance profile. Albumin supplementation, especially in patients with renal impairment, is also beneficial. Selective intestinal decontamination is associated with a reduced risk of bacterial infection and mortality in high-risk group. Conclusions: The standard treatment for SBP is prompt broad-spectrum antibiotic administration and should be tailored according to community-acquired SBP, healthcare-associated or nosocomial SBP infections and local resistance profile. Since the one-year overall mortality rates for SBP range from 53.9 to 78%, liver transplantation should be seriously considered for SBP survivors who are good candidates for transplantation. Further development of non-antibiotic strategies based on pathogenic mechanisms are also urgently needed.
Collapse
|