Innovation through Tradition: The Current Challenges in Cancer Treatment

Recent Pre-Clinical Advancements in Nuclear Medicine: Pioneering the Path to a Limitless Future

The theranostic approach in oncology holds significant importance in personalized medicine and stands as an exciting field of molecular medicine. Significant achievements have been made in this field in recent decades, particularly in treating neuroendocrine tumors using 177-Lu-radiolabeled somatostatin analogs and, more recently, in addressing prostate cancer through prostate-specific-membrane-antigen targeted radionuclide therapy. The promising clinical results obtained in these indications paved the way for the further development of this approach. With the continuous discovery of new molecular players in tumorigenesis, the development of novel radiopharmaceuticals, and the potential combination of theranostics agents with immunotherapy, nuclear medicine is poised for significant advancements. The strategy of theranostics in oncology can be categorized into (1) repurposing nuclear medicine agents for other indications, (2) improving existing radiopharmaceuticals, and (3) developing new theranostics agents for tumor-specific antigens. In this review, we provide an overview of theranostic development and shed light on its potential integration into combined treatment strategies.

Cellular photo(geno)toxicity of gefitinib after biotransformation

Gefitinib (GFT) is a selective epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitor clinically used for the treatment of patients with non-small cell lung cancer. Bioactivation by mainly Phase I hepatic metabolism leads to chemically reactive metabolites such as O-Demethyl gefitinib (DMT-GFT), 4-Defluoro-4-hydroxy gefitinib (DF-GFT), and O-Demorpholinopropyl gefitinib (DMOR-GFT), which display an enhanced UV-light absorption. In this context, the aim of the present study is to investigate the capability of gefitinib metabolites to induce photosensitivity disorders and to elucidate the involved mechanisms. According to the neutral red uptake (NRU) phototoxicity test, only DF-GFT metabolite can be considered non-phototoxic to cells with a photoirritation factor (PIF) close to 1. Moreover, DMOR-GFT is markedly more phototoxic than the parent drug (PIF = 48), whereas DMT-GFT is much less phototoxic (PIF = 7). Using the thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) method as an indicator of lipid photoperoxidation, only DMOR-GFT has demonstrated the ability to photosensitize this process, resulting in a significant amount of TBARS (similar to ketoprofen, which was used as the positive control). Protein photooxidation monitored by 2,4-dinitrophenylhydrazine (DNPH) derivatization method is mainly mediated by GFT and, to a lesser extent, by DMOR-GFT; in contrast, protein oxidation associated with DMT-GFT is nearly negligible. Interestingly, the damage to cellular DNA as revealed by the comet assay, indicates that DMT-GFT has the highest photogenotoxic potential; moreover, the DNA damage induced by this metabolite is hardly repaired by the cells after a time recovery of 18 h. This could ultimately result in mutagenic and carcinogenic effects. These results could aid oncologists when prescribing TKIs to cancer patients and, thus, establish the conditions of use and recommend photoprotection guidelines.