Structure and Function of the Polycomb Repressive Complexes PRC1 and PRC2

JARID2, a novel regulatory factor, promotes cell proliferation, migration, and invasion in oral squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Accurate regulation of gene expression is crucial for normal development and function of cells. The prognostic significance and potential carcinogenic mechanisms of the related gene JARID2 in OSCC are not yet clear, but existing research has indicated a significant association between the two.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The relationship between the expression of the JARID2 gene in tumor samples of OSCC patients and clinical pathological factors was analyzed using immunohistochemistry experiments and RT-qPCR analysis. Based on the clinical pathological data of patients, bioinformatics analysis was conducted using public databases to determine the function of JARID2 in OSCC. Knockdown OSCC cell lines were constructed, and the impact of JARID2 on the biological behavior of OSCC cell lines was assessed through CCK-8, wound healing assay, and transwell analysis.

RESULTS

Immunohistochemistry experiments confirmed the correlation between JARID2 and the prognosis of OSCC patients, while RT-qPCR experiments demonstrated its expression levels in tissue and cells. CKK-8 experiments, wound healing assays, and Transwell experiments indicated that knocking down JARID2 had a negative impact on the proliferation, invasion, and migration of OSCC cells. Bioinformatics analysis results showed that the expression of JARID2 in OSCC is closely associated with patient gene co-expression, gene function enrichment, immune infiltration, and drug sensitivity.

CONCLUSION

Our study indicates that JARID2 is a novel prognostic biomarker and potential therapeutic target for OSCC.

EZH2: The roles in targeted therapy and mechanisms of resistance in breast cancer

Drug resistance presents a formidable challenge in the realm of breast cancer therapy. Accumulating evidence suggests that enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2), a component of the polycomb repressive complex 2 (PRC2), may serve as a key regulator in controlling drug resistance. EZH2 overexpression has been observed in breast cancer and many other malignancies, showing a strong correlation with poor outcomes. This review aims to summarize the mechanisms by which EZH2 regulates drug resistance, with a specific focus on breast cancer, in order to provide a comprehensive understanding of the underlying molecular processes. Additionally, we will discuss the current strategies and outcomes of targeting EZH2 using both single agents and combination therapies, with the goal of offering improved guidance for the clinical treatment of breast cancer patients who have developed drug resistance.

Integrated single-cell and transcriptome sequencing analyses determines a chromatin regulator-based signature for evaluating prognosis in lung adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

Accumulating evidence has highlighted the significance of chromatin regulator (CR) in pathogenesis and progression of cancer. However, the prognostic role of CRs in LUAD remains obscure. We aim to detect the prognostic value of CRs in LUAD and create favorable signature for assessing prognosis and clinical value of LUAD patients.

METHODS

The mRNA sequencing data and clinical information were obtained from TCGA and GEO databases. Gene consensus clustering analysis was utilized to determine the molecular subtype of LUAD. Cox regression methods were employed to set up the CRs-based signature (CRBS) for evaluating survival rate in LUAD. Biological function and signaling pathways were identified by KEGG and GSEA analyses. In addition, we calculated the infiltration level of immunocyte by CIBERSORT algorithm. The expressions of model hub genes were detected in LUAD cell lines by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR).

RESULTS

KEGG analysis suggested the CRs were mainly involved in histone modification, nuclear division and DNA modification. Consensus clustering analysis identified a novel CRs-associated subtype which divided the combined LUAD cohort into two clusters (C1 = 217 and C2 = 296). We noticed that a remarkable discrepancy in survival rate among two clusters. Then, a total of 120 differentially expressed CRs were enrolled into stepwise Cox analyses. Four hub CRs (CBX7, HMGA2, NPAS2 and PRC1) were selected to create a risk signature which could accurately forecast patient outcomes and differentiate patient risk. GSEA unearthed that mTORC1 pathway, PI3K/Akt/mTOR and p53 pathway were greatly enriched in CRBS-high cohort. Moreover, the infiltration percentages of macrophage M0, macrophage M2, resting NK cells, memory B cells, dendritic cells and mast cells were statistically significantly different in the two groups. PCR assay confirmed the differential expression of four model biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Altogether, our project developed a robust risk signature based on CRs and offered novel insights into individualized treatment for LUAD cases.