The Effects of Acidosis on eNOS in the Systemic Vasculature: A Focus on Early Postnatal Ontogenesis

Strengthening the basics: acids and bases influence vascular structure and function, tissue perfusion, blood pressure, and human cardiovascular disease

Acids and their conjugate bases accumulate in or dissipate from the interstitial space when tissue perfusion does not match the metabolic demand. Extracellular acidosis dilates most arterial beds, but associated acid-base disturbances-e.g., intracellular acidification and decreases in HCO3- concentration-can also elicit pro-contractile influences that diminish vasodilation and even dominate in some vascular beds to cause vasoconstriction. The ensemble activities of the acid-base-sensitive reactions in vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells optimize vascular resistance for blood pressure control and direct the perfusion towards active tissue. In this review, we describe the mechanisms of intracellular pH regulation in the vascular wall and discuss how vascular smooth muscle and endothelial cells sense acid-base disturbances. We further deliberate on the functional effects of local acid-base disturbances and their integrated cardiovascular consequences under physiological and pathophysiological conditions. Finally, we address how mutations and polymorphisms in the molecular machinery that regulates pH locally and senses acid-base disturbances in the vascular wall can result in cardiovascular disease. Based on the emerging molecular insight, we propose that targeting local pH-dependent effectors-rather than systemic acid-base disturbances-has therapeutic potential to interfere with the progression and reduce the severity of cardiovascular disease.

How protons pave the way to aggressive cancers

Cancers undergo sequential changes to proton (H+) concentration and sensing that are consequences of the disease and facilitate its further progression. The impact of protonation state on protein activity can arise from alterations to amino acids or their titration. Indeed, many cancer-initiating mutations influence pH balance, regulation or sensing in a manner that enables growth and invasion outside normal constraints as part of oncogenic transformation. These cancer-supporting effects become more prominent when tumours develop an acidic microenvironment owing to metabolic reprogramming and disordered perfusion. The ensuing intracellular and extracellular pH disturbances affect multiple aspects of tumour biology, ranging from proliferation to immune surveillance, and can even facilitate further mutagenesis. As a selection pressure, extracellular acidosis accelerates disease progression by favouring acid-resistant cancer cells, which are typically associated with aggressive phenotypes. Although acid-base disturbances in tumours often occur alongside hypoxia and lactate accumulation, there is now ample evidence for a distinct role of H+-operated responses in key events underpinning cancer. The breadth of these actions presents therapeutic opportunities to change the trajectory of disease.

Effect of sulfasalazine on endothelium-dependent vascular response by the activation of Nrf2 signalling pathway

Background: Diabetes mellitus leads to endothelial dysfunction and accumulation of oxygen radicals. Sulfasalazine-induced Nrf2 activation reduces oxidative stress in vessels. Thus, in the present study, we investigated the effects of sulfasalazine on endothelial dysfunction induced by high glucose. We also ascribed the underlying mechanism involved in glucose-induced endothelial dysfunction.

Methods: For this experiment we used 80 Wistar Albino rats thoracic aorta to calculate the dose response curve of noradrenaline and acetylcholine. Vessels were incubated in normal and high glucose for 2 h. To investigate glucose and sulfasalazine effects the vessels of the high glucose group were pre-treated with sulfasalazine (300 mM), JNK inhibitor (SP600125), and ERK inhibitor (U0126) for 30 min. The dose response curve was calculated through organ bath. The eNOS, TAS, TOS, and HO-1 levels were estimated by commercially available ELISA kits.

Results: In the high glucose group, the E_max for contraction was significantly higher (p < 0.001), and E_max for relaxation was lower than that of control. These functional changes were parallel with the low levels of eNOS (p < 0.05). High glucose vessel treated with sulfasalazine showed low E_max value for contraction (p < 0.001) however, the E_max for relaxation was significantly high (p < 0.001) when compared to high glucose group. In the JNK group, E_max for contraction and relaxation was inhibited (p < 0.001) compared to sulfasalazine treated vessels. HO—1 enzyme levels were significantly low (p < 0.01) with sulfasalazine but higher with ERK inhibitor (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: High glucose induced endothelial dysfunction and sulfasalazine reduced damage in high glucose vessels by activating eNOS, antioxidant effect through HO-1 enzymes and particularly inducing Nrf2 via the ERK and JNK pathways.