RNA Editing Enzyme ADAR1 Regulates METTL3 in an Editing Dependent Manner to Promote Breast Cancer Progression via METTL3/ARHGAP5/YTHDF1 Axis

Loss of ADAR1 induces ferroptosis of breast cancer cells

Adenosine deaminases acting on RNA 1(ADAR1), an RNA editing enzyme that converts adenosine to inosine by deamination in double-stranded RNAs, plays an important role in occurrence and progression of various types of cancer. Ferroptosis has emerged as a hot topic of cancer research in recent years. We have previously reported that ADAR1 promotes breast cancer progression by regulating miR-335-5p and METTL3. However, whether ADAR1 has effects on ferroptosis in breast cancer cells is largely unknown. In this study, we knocked down ADAR1 using CRISPR-Cas9 technology or over-expressed ADAR1 protein using plasmid expressing ADAR1 in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cell lines, then detected cell viability, and levels of ROS, MDA, GSH, Fe2+, GPX4 protein and miR-335-5p. We showed that the cell proliferation was inhibited, levels of ROS, MDA, Fe2+, and miR-335-5p were increased, while GSH and GPX4 levels were decreased after loss of ADAR1, compared to the control group. The opposite effects were observed after ADAR1 overexpression in the cells. Further, we demonstrated that ADAR1-controlled miR-335-5p targeted Sp1 transcription factor of GPX4, a known ferroptosis molecular marker, leading to inhibition of ferroptosis by ADAR1 in breast cancer cells. Moreover, RNA editing activity of ADAR1 is not essential for inducing ferroptosis. Collectively, loss of ADAR1 induces ferroptosis in breast cancer cells by regulating miR-335-5p/Sp1/GPX4 pathway. The findings may provide insights into the mechanism by which ADAR1 promotes breast cancer progression via inhibiting ferroptosis.

Molecular mechanisms of non-genetic aberrant peptide production in cancer

The cancer peptidome has long been known to be altered by genetic mutations. However, more recently, non-genetic polypeptide mutations have also been related to cancer cells. These non-genetic mutations occur post-t30ranscriptionally, leading to the modification of the peptide primary structure, while the corresponding genes remain unchanged. Three main processes participate in the production of these aberrant proteins: mRNA alternative splicing, mRNA editing, and mRNA aberrant translation. In this review, we summarize the molecular mechanisms underlying these processes and the recent findings on the functions of the aberrant proteins, as well as their exploitability as new therapeutic targets due to their specific enrichment in cancer cells. These non-genetic aberrant polypeptides represent a source of novel cancer cell targets independent from their level of mutational burden, still to be exhaustively explored.

Epitranscriptomic orchestrations: Unveiling the regulatory paradigm of m6A, A-to-I editing, and m5C in breast cancer via long noncoding RNAs and microRNAs

Breast cancer (BC) poses a persistent global health challenge, particularly in countries with elevated human development indices linked to factors such as increased life expectancy, education, and wealth. Despite therapeutic progress, challenges persist, and the role of epitranscriptomic RNA modifications in BC remains inadequately understood. The epitranscriptome, comprising diverse posttranscriptional modifications on RNA molecules, holds the potential to intricately modulate RNA function and regulation, implicating dysregulation in various diseases, including BC. Noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs), acting as posttranscriptional regulators, influence physiological and pathological processes, including cancer. RNA modifications in long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs) add an extra layer to gene expression control. This review delves into recent insights into epitranscriptomic RNA modifications, such as N-6-methyladenosine (m6A), adenine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing, and 5-methylcytosine (m5C), specifically in the context of lncRNA and miRNAs in BC, highlighting their potential implications in BC development and progression. Understanding this intricate regulatory landscape is vital for deciphering the molecular mechanisms underlying BC and identifying potential therapeutic targets.

YTHDF1 enhances stemness and chemoresistance in triple-negative breast cancer cells by upregulating SIAH2

Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is the most lethal and aggressive subtype of breast cancer, and chemoresistance is the major determinant of TNBC treatment failure. This study explores the molecular mechanism of TNBC chemoresistance. The Cancer Genome Atlas, breast cancer integrative platform, and GEPIA databases were used to analyze the expression and correlation of YTHDF1 and seven in absentia homology 2 (SIAH2) in breast cancer. Knockdown of YTHDF1 and SIAH2, or overexpression of SIAH2 in vitro and in vivo, was conducted to evaluate the impact of changes in YTHDF1 and SIAH2 expression on TNBC cell proliferation, apoptosis, stemness, drug resistance, and Hippo pathway gene expression. YTHDF1 and SIAH2 were highly expressed in breast cancer patients and TNBC cells. Knockdown of YTHDF1 and SIAH2 significantly inhibited proliferation and stemness and promoted apoptosis and chemosensitivity of TNBC cells. Mechanistically, the knockdown of YTHDF1 inhibited the expression of SIAH2, thereby downregulating the Hippo pathway, which inhibited proliferation and stemness and promoted apoptosis and chemosensitivity of TNBC cells. The current findings revealed the regulatory mechanism of YTHDF1 in TNBC and clarified the role of the YTHDF1/SIAH2 axis in TNBC drug resistance and stemness. This could provide new insights into the vital role of targeting YTHDF1/SIAH2 to suppress drug resistance and stemness in TNBC cells.

The role of ADAR1 through and beyond its editing activity in cancer

Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) editing of RNA, catalyzed by adenosine deaminase acting on RNA (ADAR) enzymes, is a prevalent RNA modification in mammals. It has been shown that A-to-I editing plays a critical role in multiple diseases, such as cardiovascular disease, neurological disorder, and particularly cancer. ADARs are the family of enzymes, including ADAR1, ADAR2, and ADAR3, that catalyze the occurrence of A-to-I editing. Notably, A-to-I editing is mainly catalyzed by ADAR1. Given the significance of A-to-I editing in disease development, it is important to unravel the complex roles of ADAR1 in cancer for the development of novel therapeutic interventions.In this review, we briefly describe the progress of research on A-to-I editing and ADARs in cancer, mainly focusing on the role of ADAR1 in cancer from both editing-dependent and independent perspectives. In addition, we also summarized the factors affecting the expression and editing activity of ADAR1 in cancer.

Prognostic analysis and risk assessment based on RNA editing in hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, and prognosis assessment is crucial for guiding treatment decisions. In this study, we aimed to develop a personalized prognostic model for HCC based on RNA editing. RNA editing is a post-transcriptional process that can affect gene expression and, in some cases, play a role in cancer development. By analyzing RNA editing sites in HCC, we sought to identify a set of sites associated with patient prognosis and use them to create a prognostic model. We gathered RNA editing data from the Synapse database, comprising 9990 RNA editing sites and 250 HCC samples. Additionally, we collected clinical data for 377 HCC patients from the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. We employed a multi-step approach to identify prognosis-related RNA editing sites (PR-RNA-ESs). We assessed how patients in the high-risk and low-risk groups, as defined by the model, fared in terms of survival. A nomogram was developed to predict the precise survival prognosis of HCC patients and assessed the prognostic model's utility through a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Our analysis identified 33 prognosis-related RNA editing sites (PR-RNA-ESs) associated with HCC patient prognosis. Using a combination of LASSO regression and cross-validation, we constructed a prognostic model based on 13 PR-RNA-ESs. Survival analysis demonstrated significant differences in the survival outcomes of patients in the high-risk and low-risk groups defined by this model. Additionally, the differential expression of the 13 PR-RNA-ESs played a role in shaping patient survival. Risk-prognostic investigations further distinguished patients based on their risk levels. The nomogram enabled precise survival prognosis prediction. Our study has successfully developed a highly personalized and accurate prognostic model for individuals with HCC, leveraging RNA editing data. This model has the potential to revolutionize clinical evaluation and medical management by providing individualized prognostic information. The identification of specific RNA editing sites associated with HCC prognosis and their incorporation into a predictive model holds promise for improving the precision of treatment strategies and ultimately enhancing patient outcomes in HCC.

Elevated ADAR expression is significantly linked to shorter overall survival and immune infiltration in patients with lung adenocarcinoma

To date, few studies have investigated whether the RNA-editing enzymes adenosine deaminases acting on RNA (ADARs) influence RNA functioning in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). To investigate the role of ADAR in lung cancer, we leveraged the advantages of The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database, from which we obtained transcriptome data and clinical information from 539 patients with LUAD. First, we compared ARAR expression levels in LUAD tissues with those in normal lung tissues using paired and unpaired analyses. Next, we evaluated the influence of ADARs on multiple prognostic indicators, including overall survival at 1, 3 and 5 years, as well as disease-specific survival and progression-free interval, in patients with LUAD. We also used Kaplan-Meier survival curves to estimate overall survival and Cox regression analysis to assess covariates associated with prognosis. A nomogram was constructed to validate the impact of the ADARs and clinicopathological factors on patient survival probabilities. The volcano plot and heat map revealed the differentially expressed genes associated with ADARs in LUAD. Finally, we examined ADAR expression versus immune cell infiltration in LUAD using Spearman's analysis. Using the Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA2) database, we identified the top 100 genes most significantly correlated with ADAR expression, constructed a protein-protein interaction network and performed a Gene Ontology/Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes analysis on these genes. Our results demonstrate that ADARs are overexpressed in LUAD and correlated with poor patient prognosis. ADARs markedly increase the infiltration of T central memory, T helper 2 and T helper cells, while reducing the infiltration of immature dendritic, dendritic and mast cells. Most immune response markers, including T cells, tumor-associated macrophages, T cell exhaustion, mast cells, macrophages, monocytes and dendritic cells, are closely correlated with ADAR expression in LUAD.

A-to-I RNA editing shows dramatic up-regulation in osteosarcoma and broadly regulates tumor-related genes by altering microRNA target regions

A-to-I RNA editing is a prevalent type of RNA modification in animals. The dysregulation of RNA editing has led to multiple human cancers. However, the role of RNA editing has never been studied in osteosarcoma, a complex bone cancer with unknown molecular basis. We retrieved the RNA-sequencing data from 24 primary osteosarcoma patients and 3 healthy controls. We systematically profiled the RNA editomes in these samples and quantitatively identified reliable differential editing sites (DES) between osteosarcoma and normal samples. RNA editing efficiency is dramatically increased in osteosarcoma, presumably due to the significant up-regulation of editing enzymes ADAR1 and ADAR2. Up-regulated DES in osteosarcoma are enriched in 3'UTRs. Strikingly, such 3'UTR sites are further enriched in microRNA binding regions of gene EMP2 and other oncogenes, abolishing the microRNA suppression on target genes. Accordingly, the expression of these tumor-promoting genes is elevated in osteosarcoma. There might be an RNA editing-dependent pathway leading to osteosarcoma. We expanded our knowledge on the potential roles of RNA editing in oncogenesis. Based on these molecular features, our work is valuable for future prognosis and diagnosis of osteosarcoma.

METTL3-mediated m6A methylation of PYGB facilitates pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma progression through the activation of NF-κB signaling

Brain Type Glycogen Phosphorylase (PYGB) has been revealed to participate in the progression of multiple human cancers. Nevertheless, the clinical significance and biological function of PYGB in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PAAD) remains unclarified. This study first analyzed the expression pattern, diagnostic value, and prognostic significance of PYGB in PAAD using the TCGA database. Subsequently, western blot assessed the protein expression of genes in PAAD cells. The viability, apoptosis, migration, and invasion of PAAD cells were assessed by CCK-8, TUNEL, and Transwell assays. Finally, in vivo experiment evaluated the effect of PYGB on PAAD tumor growth and metastasis. Through our investigation, it was revealed that PYGB had extremely high expression in PAAD and predicted a worse prognosis in patients with PAAD. Besides, the aggressiveness of PAAD cells could be suppressed or enhanced by depleting or supplementing PYGB. In addition, we demonstrated that METTL3 enhanced the translation of PYGB mRNA in an m6A-YTHDF1-dependent manner. Moreover, PYGB was revealed to regulate the malignant behaviors of PAAD cells by the mediation of the NF-κB signaling. Finally, PYGB depletion suppressed the growth and distant metastasis of PAAD in vivo. To conclude, our results indicated that METTL3-mediated m6A modification of PYGB exerted the tumor-promotive effect on PAAD through NF-κB signaling, suggesting PYGB is a potential therapeutic target in PAAD.

CREBZF mRNA nanoparticles suppress breast cancer progression through a positive feedback loop boosted by circPAPD4

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer (BC) negatively impacts the health of women worldwide. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are a group of endogenous RNAs considered essential regulatory factor in BC tumorigenesis and progression. However, the underlying molecular mechanisms of circRNAs remain unclear.

METHODS

Expression levels of circPAPD4, miR-1269a, CREBZF, and ADAR1 in BC cell lines and tissues were measured using bioinformatics analysis, RT-qPCR, ISH, and IHC. Cell proliferation and apoptosis were measured using CCK8, EdU staining, flow cytometry, and TUNEL assays. Pearson correlation analysis, RNA pull-down, dual-luciferase reporter, and co-immunoprecipitation assays were used to explore the correlation among circPAPD4, miR-1269a, CREBZF, STAT3, and ADAR1. Effects of circPAPD4 overexpression on tumor progression were investigated using in vivo assays. Moreover, CREBZF mRNA delivered by polymeric nanoparticles (CREBZF-mRNA-NPs) was used to examine application value of our findings.

RESULTS

CircPAPD4 expression was low in BC tissues and cells. Functionally, circPAPD4 inhibited proliferation and promoted apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, circPAPD4 biogenesis was regulated by ADAR1. And circPAPD4 promoted CREBZF expression by competitively binding to miR-1269a. More importantly, CREBZF promoted circPAPD4 expression by suppressing STAT3 dimerization and ADAR1 expression, revealing a novel positive feedback loop that curbed BC progression. Systematic delivery of CREBZF-mRNA-NPs effectively induced CREBZF expression and activated the positive feedback loop of circPAPD4/miR-1269a/CREBZF/STAT3/ADAR1, which might suppress BC progression in vitro and in vivo.

CONCLUSION

Our findings firstly illustrated that circPAPD4/miR-1269a/CREBZF/STAT3/ADAR1 positive feedback loop mediated BC progression, and delivering CREBZF mRNA nanoparticles suppressed BC progression in vitro and in vivo, which might provide novel insights into therapeutic strategies for breast cancer.

ARHGAP6 inhibits bladder cancer cell viability, migration, and invasion via β-catenin signaling and enhances mitomycin C sensitivity

The Rho/ROCK pathway regulates diverse cellular processes and contributes to the development and advancement of several types of human cancers. This study investigated the role of specific Rho GTPase-activating proteins (RhoGAP), ARHGAP6, in bladder cancer (BC). In this study, ARHGAP6 expression in BC and its clinical significance were investigated. In vitro and in vivo assays were used to explore the tumor-related function and the underlying molecular mechanism ARHGAP6 of in BC. The mRNA and protein levels of ARHGAP6 significantly reduced in human BC tissues and cell lines compared with corresponding adjacent non-cancerous tissues and normal urothelial cells. In vitro, ARHGAP6 overexpression markedly decreased the viability, migration, and invasion of BC cells. Interestingly, low ARHGAP6 expression in BC strongly correlated with poor patient survival and was highly associated with metastasis and β-catenin signaling. Furthermore, ARHGAP6 expression strongly influenced the sensitivity of BC cells to mitomycin C treatment. Together, our results demonstrate that ARHGAP6 plays critical roles in regulating the proliferation, migration, invasion, and metastasis of BC cells possibly via the modulation of β-catenin and strongly influences the chemosensitivity of BC cells.

Roles of RNA Methylations in Cancer Progression, Autophagy, and Anticancer Drug Resistance

RNA methylations play critical roles in RNA processes, including RNA splicing, nuclear export, nonsense-mediated RNA decay, and translation. Regulators of RNA methylations have been shown to be differentially expressed between tumor tissues/cancer cells and adjacent tissues/normal cells. N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is the most prevalent internal modification of RNAs in eukaryotes. m6A regulators include m6A writers, m6A demethylases, and m6A binding proteins. Since m6A regulators play important roles in regulating the expression of oncogenes and tumor suppressor genes, targeting m6A regulators can be a strategy for developing anticancer drugs. Anticancer drugs targeting m6A regulators are in clinical trials. m6A regulator-targeting drugs could enhance the anticancer effects of current chemotherapy drugs. This review summarizes the roles of m6A regulators in cancer initiation and progression, autophagy, and anticancer drug resistance. The review also discusses the relationship between autophagy and anticancer drug resistance, the effect of high levels of m6A on autophagy and the potential values of m6A regulators as diagnostic markers and anticancer therapeutic targets.