Genomic Landscape of Mixed-Phenotype Acute Leukemia

Atypical BCR-ABL1 transcript in mixed phenotype acute leukemia with bone marrow necrosis

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a type of acute leukemia in which encompasses mixed features of myeloid, T-lymphoid, and/or B-lymphoid differentiation. Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) MPAL is a rare subgroup with a poor prognosis and accounts for ＜1% of adult acute leukemia. Until now, there is still no consensus on how to best treat Ph+ MPAL. Here, we report a 62-year-old male with Ph+ (atypical e13a2 BCR-ABL1 fusion protein) MPAL. This patient presented with recurrent and intense bone pain due to bone marrow necrosis (BMN). Besides, he did not achieve a complete remission for the first two chemotherapies, until he received flumatinib combined with hyper-CVAD (B) (a dose-intensive regimen include methotrexate and cytarabine). To our knowledge, this is the first report to describe the coexistence of BMN and atypical e13a2 BCR-ABL1 transcripts in patients with MPAL. This finding will bring new understandings in the diagnosis and treatment of Ph+ MPAL.

Effective treatment of relapsed/refractory CD19-positive B/T-type mixed-phenotype acute leukemia with blinatumomab: A case report

A 26-year-old man was diagnosed with B/T-type mixed-phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL-B/T) based on blasts being positive for CD19, cytoplasmic CD3, and cyCD79a, but negative for myeloperoxidase. Acute lymphoblastic leukemia-based chemotherapy was started, but the leukemia was refractory. He underwent cord blood transplantation with the conditioning regimen of total body irradiation plus cyclophosphamide and cytarabine with granulocyte-colony stimulating factor priming. Prophylaxis for graft versus host disease was performed with short-term methotrexate and cyclosporin. The leukemia relapsed in bone marrow 20 months later. At that time, he was treated with inotuzumab ozogamicin because the blasts expressed CD22 (75.4%), but this was ineffective. He was next administered blinatumomab with dexamethasone pretreatment, resulting in a complete remission (CR). He subsequently underwent human leukocyte antigen-haploidentical peripheral blood stem cell transplantation. He has still maintained a CR for 12 months. Blinatumomab might be a promising treatment and a bridge to stem cell transplantation even in relapsed/refractory CD19-expressing MPAL-B/T.

Identification of a novel monocyte/macrophage-related gene signature for predicting survival and immune response in acute myeloid leukemia

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a heterogeneous hematological tumor with poor immunotherapy effect. This study was to develop a monocyte/macrophage-related prognostic risk score (MMrisk) and identify new therapeutic biomarkers for AML. We utilized differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in combination with single-cell RNA sequencing to identify monocyte/macrophage-related genes (MMGs). Eight genes were selected for the construction of a MMrisk model using univariate Cox regression analysis and LASSO regression analysis. We then validated the MMrisk on two GEO datasets. Lastly, we investigated the immunologic characteristics and advantages of immunotherapy and potential targeted drugs for MMrisk groups. Our study identified that the MMrisk is composed of eight MMGs, including HOPX, CSTB, MAP3K1, LGALS1, CFD, MXD1, CASP1 and BCL2A1. The low MMrisk group survived longer than high MMrisk group (P < 0.001). The high MMrisk group was positively correlated with B cells, plasma cells, CD4 memory cells, Mast cells, CAFs, monocytes, M2 macrophages, Endothelial, tumor mutation, and most immune checkpoints (PD1, Tim-3, CTLA4, LAG3). Furthermore, drug sensitivity analysis showed that AZD.2281, Axitinib, AUY922, ABT.888, and ATRA were effective in high-risk MM patients. Our research shows that MMrisk is a potential biomarker which is helpful to identify the molecular characteristics of AML immunology.

Genetic Characterization of Pediatric Mixed Phenotype Acute Leukemia (MPAL)

BACKGROUND/AIM

Mixed phenotype acute leukemia (MPAL) is a rare hematologic malignancy in which the leukemic cells cannot be assigned to any specific lineage. The lack of well-defined, pathogenetically relevant diagnostic criteria makes the clinical handling of MPAL patients challenging. We herein report the genetic findings in bone marrow cells from two pediatric MPAL patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Bone marrow cells were examined using G-banding, array comparative genomic hybridization, RNA sequencing, reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction, Sanger sequencing, and fluorescence in situ hybridization.

RESULTS

In the first patient, the genetic analyses revealed structural aberrations of chromosomal bands 8p11, 10p11, 11q21, and 17p11, the chimeras MLLT10::PICALM and PICALM::MLLT10, and imbalances (gains/losses) on chromosomes 2, 4, 8, 13, and 21. A submicroscopic deletion in 21q was also found including the RUNX1 locus. In the second patient, there were structural aberrations of chromosome bands 1p32, 8p11, 12p13, 20p13, and 20q11, the chimeras ETV6::LEXM and NCOA6::ETV6, and imbalances on chromosomes 2, 8, 11, 12, 16, 19, X, and Y.

CONCLUSION

The leukemic cells from both MPAL patients carried chromosome aberrations resulting in fusion genes as well as genomic imbalances resulting in gain and losses of many gene loci. The detected fusion genes probably represent the main leukemogenic events, although the gains and losses are also likely to play a role in leukemogenesis.

[Update on acute leukemia of ambiguous lineage in 2023 - Recommendations of the French Society for Childhood and Adolescent Cancer and Leukemia (SFCE)]

Acute leukemias of ambiguous lineage (ALAL) represent between 3 and 5% of childhood AL. This term encompasses many subtypes of AL that have been defined according to the immunophenotypic profile based on the expression of various lineage markers. This classification has been modified and enriched during the last decade thanks to the improvement of molecular biology techniques, which have led to reconsider the ontogenic proximity existing between certain forms of ALAL. This increasing diagnostic complexity justifies the establishment of a close communication between clinicians and biologists in the management of these rare forms of AL. Indeed, the initial classification remains the cornerstone of their management since it conditions the future choice of therapeutic protocol. Thus, with the notable exception of undifferentiated forms of AL or AUL (for acute undetermined leukemia), it is now accepted that ALAL benefit from a lymphoid-based therapy approach. As with the management of "classic" acute lymphoblastic leukemias (ALL), the evaluation of response to treatment will determine the modalities of therapeutic intensification. The objective of improving the prognosis of ALAL justifies, in the long term, their future inclusion in the international ALLTogether protocol while continuing in-depth molecular exploration of these patients to identify targeted therapies.