Biological Cover Mitigates Disruption of the Dermal Structure in Mechanically Expanded Skin in a Porcine Model

Tissue expansion mitigates radiation-induced skin fibrosis in a porcine model

Tissue expansion (TE) is the primary method for breast reconstruction after mastectomy. In many cases, mastectomy patients undergo radiation treatment (XR). Radiation is known to induce skin fibrosis and is one of the main causes for complications during post-mastectomy breast reconstruction. TE, on the other hand, induces a pro-regenerative response that culminates in growth of new skin. However, the combined effect of XR and TE on skin mechanics is unknown. Here we used the porcine model of TE to study the effect of radiation on skin fibrosis through biaxial testing, histological analysis, and kinematic analysis of skin deformation over time. We found that XR leads to stiffening of skin compared to control based on a shift in the transition stretch (transition between a low stiffness and an exponential stress-strain region characteristic of collagenous tissue). The change in transition stretch can be explained by thicker, more aligned collagen fiber bundles measured in histology images. Skin subjected to both XR+TE showed similar micostructure to controls as well as similar biaxial response, suggesting that physiological remodeling of collagen induced by TE partially counteracts pro-fibrotic XR effects. Skin growth was indirectly assessed with a kinematic approach that quantified increase in permanent area changes without reduction in thickness, suggesting production of new tissue driven by TE even in the presence of radiation treatment. Future work will focus on the detailed biological mechanisms by which TE counteracts radiation induced fibrosis. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: Breast cancer is the most prevalent in women and its treatment often results in total breast removal (mastectomy), followed by reconstruction using tissue expanders. Radiation, which is used in about a third of breast reconstruction cases, can lead to significant complications. The timing of radiation treatment remains controversial. Radiation is known to cause immediate skin damage and long-term fibrosis. Tissue expansion leads to a pro-regenerative response involving collagen remodeling. Here we show that tissue expansion immediately prior to radiation can reduce the level of radiation-induced fibrosis. Thus, we anticipate that this new evidence will open up new avenues of investigation into how the collagen remodeling and pro-regenerative effects of tissue expansion can be leverage to prevent radiation-induced fibrosis.

The role of interface geometry and appendages on the mesoscale mechanics of the skin

The skin is the largest organ in the human body and serves various functions, including mechanical protection and mechanosensation. Yet, even though skin's biomechanics are attributed to two main layers-epidermis and dermis-computational models have often treated this tissue as a thin homogeneous material or, when considering multiple layers, have ignored the most prominent heterogeneities of skin seen at the mesoscale. Here, we create finite element models of representative volume elements (RVEs) of skin, including the three-dimensional variation of the interface between the epidermis and dermis as well as considering the presence of hair follicles. The sinusoidal interface, which approximates the anatomical features known as Rete ridges, does not affect the homogenized mechanical response of the RVE but contributes to stress concentration, particularly at the valleys of the Rete ridges. The stress profile is three-dimensional due to the skin's anisotropy, leading to high-stress bands connecting the valleys of the Rete ridges through one type of saddle point. The peaks of the Rete ridges and the other class of saddle points of the sinusoidal surface form a second set of low-stress bands under equi-biaxial loading. Another prominent feature of the heterogeneous stress pattern is a switch in the stress jump across the interface, which becomes lower with respect to the flat interface at increasing deformations. These features are seen in both tension and shear loading. The RVE with the hair follicle showed strains concentrating at the epidermis adjacent to the hair follicle, the epithelial tissue surrounding the hair right below the epidermis, and the bulb or base region of the hair follicle. The regions of strain concentration near the hair follicle in equi-biaxial and shear loading align with the presence of distinct mechanoreceptors in the skin, except for the bulb or base region. This study highlights the importance of skin heterogeneities, particularly its potential mechanophysiological role in the sense of touch and the prevention of skin delamination.

Acellular Dermal Matrix Cover Improves Skin Growth during Tissue Expansion by Affecting Distribution of Mechanical Forces

BACKGROUND

Biological cover over tissue expander prostheses has been introduced to provide soft-tissue support for tissue expanders during breast reconstruction. However, its impact on mechanically induced skin growth remains unknown. This study investigates the hypothesis that covering the tissue expander with acellular dermal matrix (ADM) affects mechanotransduction without compromising the efficacy of tissue expansion.

METHODS

Tissue expansion, with and without use of ADM, was performed on a porcine model. The tissue expanders were inflated twice with 45 mL of saline, and the full-thickness skin biopsy specimens were harvested from expanded and control unexpanded skin 1 week and 8 weeks after the final inflation. Histologic evaluation, immunohistochemistry staining, and gene expression analysis were performed. Skin growth and total deformation were evaluated using isogeometric analysis.

RESULTS

The authors' results demonstrate that use of ADM as a biological cover during tissue expansion does not impede mechanotransduction that leads to skin growth and blood vessel formation. Isogeometric analysis revealed similar total deformation and growth of expanded skin with and without a biological cover, confirming that its use does not inhibit mechanically induced skin growth. In addition, the authors found that use of an ADM cover results in more uniform distribution of mechanical forces applied by the tissue expander.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that ADM improves mechanically induced skin growth during tissue expansion by facilitating a more uniform distribution of mechanical forces applied by the tissue expander. Therefore, the use of a biological cover has potential to improve outcomes in tissue expansion-based reconstruction.