Predicting Outcomes of Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab Treatment in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Consistent efficacy of hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy irrespective of PD‑L1 positivity in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma

Atezolizumab/bevacizumab is the first line of treatment for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), combining immune checkpoint inhibitor and anti-VEGF monoclonal antibodies. Hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) is administered when the above-described combination fails to confer sufficient clinical benefit. The present study aimed to explore the association between tumor programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positivity and HAIC response. A total of 40 patients with HCC who had undergone HAIC with available biopsy samples obtained between January 2020 and May 2023 were retrospectively enrolled. Tumor response, progression-free survival (PFS), disease control rate (DCR) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. PD-L1 expression in tumor samples was assessed using a combined positivity score. The response rates of HAIC-treated patients with advanced HCC after failure of atezolizumab/bevacizumab combination therapy were recorded. OS (P=0.9717) and PFS (P=0.4194) did not differ between patients with and without PD-L1 positivity. The objective response rate (P=0.7830) and DCR (P=0.7020) also did not differ based on PD-L1 status. In conclusion, the current findings highlight the consistent efficacy of HAIC, regardless of PD-L1 positivity.

Clinical usefulness of newly developed prognostic predictive score for atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for hepatocellular carcinoma

AIMS

The aim of the present study was to elucidate detailed parameters for prediction of prognosis for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) treatment.

METHODS

A total of 719 patients (males 577, median age 74 years) treated with Atez/Bev between September 2020 and January 2023 were enrolled. Factors related to overall survival (OS) were extracted and a prognostic scoring system based on hazard ratio (HR) was created. OS and progression-free survival (PFS) were retrospectively examined, and the prognostic ability of the newly developed system was compared to CRAFITY score using concordance index (c-index) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) results.

RESULTS

Cox-hazards multivariate analysis showed BCLC classification C/D (HR 1.4; 1 point), AFP ≥100 ng/mL (HR 1.4; 1 point), mALBI 2a (HR 1.7; 1 point), mALBI 2b/3 (HR 2.8; 2 points), and DCP ≥100 mAU/mL (HR 1.6; 1 point) as significant factors. The assigned points were added and used to develop the IMmunotherapy with AFP, BCLC staging, mALBI, and DCP evaluation (IMABALI-De) scoring system. For IMABALI-De scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5, OS was not applicable (NA), NA, 26.11, 18.79, 14.07, and 8.32 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 2788.67, c-index 0.699), while for CRAFITY scores of 0, 1, and 2, OS was 26.11, 20.29, and 11.32 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 2864.54, c-index 0.606). PFS periods for those IMABALI-De scores were 21.75, 12.89, 9.18, 8.0, 5.0, and 3.75 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 5203.32, c-index 0.623) and for the CRAFITY scores were 10.32, 7.68, and 3.57 months, respectively (p < .001; AIC 5246.61, c-index 0.574). As compared with CRAFITY score, IMABALI-De score had better AIC and c-index results for both OS and PFS.

CONCLUSION

The present results indicated that the proposed IMABALI-De score may be favorable for predicting prognosis of uHCC patients receiving Atez/Bev therapy.

Predictors of Survival in Patients With Hepatocellular Cancer Receiving Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab

OBJECTIVES

In randomized clinical trials in patients with hepatocellular cancer (HCC), combination therapy with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (Atezo-Bev) prolonged survival, and these treatments have become the standard first-line therapy for advanced HCC. However, clinical trials may not reflect real-life clinical practice due to treatment selection criteria. Thus, our aim was to understand predictors of HCC outcomes with these treatments in a real-world, multicenter setting.

METHODS

A retrospective review of all patients 18 years of age or older treated for advanced primary liver cancer between February 2020 and August 2022 was conducted to assess the relationship between overall survival and clinical and biochemical variables before or during treatment. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression survival analyses were performed to identify predictors of survival following treatment.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven eligible patients with unresectable HCC received Atezo-Bev over a consecutive 30-month period. Cox regression identified several significant ( P <0.05) predictors of survival, including pretreatment albumin (hazard ratios [HR]: 0.2; CI: 0.1-0.4), total bilirubin (HR: 1.3; CI: 1.2-1.5), and international normalized ratio (HR: 5.6; CI: 2.5-12.5). In multivariate analyses, these were significantly associated as predictors of mortality, and patients with pretreatment albumin <3.5 mg/dL had significantly lower survival than those ≥3.5 (153 vs. 522 d, P <0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment hypoalbuminemia, high bilirubin, and biochemical tests indicative of hepatic or renal dysfunction can independently predict short-term mortality in advanced HCC patients receiving Atezo-Bev.